臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：中學生解釋風格量表之編製及其效度研究
書刊名：彰化師大輔導學報
作者：高民凱／林清文 引用關係
作者(外文)：Gao, Min-kai／Lin, Chin-wen
出版日期：2002
卷期：23
頁次：頁131-162
主題關鍵詞：中學生；量表編製；解釋風格；憂鬱；Depression；Explanatory style；High school student；Inventory development
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:35
本研究參酌「習得無助的修訂模式」(Abramson, Seligman, & Teasdale, 1978)之架構，並實地訪談中學生，收集中學生在生活中常發生的事件及其可能的解釋，以為編擬題目時的依據，透過量表編製程序編製「中學生解釋風格量表」，並以多種途徑建立量表的信度、效度資料。所得資料經皮爾遜積差相關法、因素分析等統計方法處理。 研究結果摘要如下： 1.中學生解釋風格量表具有良好的穩定性，量尺的隔雙週重測信度介於.52~.67；然其內部一致性仍未臻理想，量尺的Cronbach α係數介於.16~.62。 2.中學生解釋風格量表和不同型式量表的同時關連效度，「正向事件個人性解釋風格量尺」、「負向事件個人性解釋風格量尺」、「正向事件通則性解釋風格量尺」、「負向事件通則性解釋風格量尺」等四個基本量尺介於0~.36'「正向事件解釋風格量尺」、「負向事件解釋風格量尺」、「解釋風格量尺」等三個組合量尺介於.08~.31。在因素考驗中，「正向事件解釋風格量尺」及「負向事件解釋風格量尺」各可得二因素，分別可解釋16.11 %、14.96%的量尺變異量，符合量尺所依據的理論結構。 3.中學生解釋風格量表和以CAVE技術進行的評量之間的相關係數介於-.12~.06。另外，四個基本量尺之間的相關介於-.07~.13。 4.中學生的解釋風格和同時及未來的憂鬱傾向之間有顯著相關，符合量尺所依據的理論結構。
The purpose of this study was to construct an instrument, the Explanatory Style Inventory-ESI. ESI was expected to use in evaluating high school student's explanatory style. The literature was reviewed to initial the schema of evaluation, and the standardized procedure of instrument developing was used to construct ESI. 3,852 subjects completed the ESI. All quantitative data was analysis by SPSS, the statistical analysis result supported the validity and reliability of ESI. The main findings of this study were as follows: 1.the ESI has good test-retest reliability and preservative internal consistency. 2.The concurrent validity between different types of the ESI was modest and its construct validity was good. 3.The concurrent validity between the CAVE ratings and the scores from the ESI was not good. The correlations between the four scales of the ESI range from -.07 to .13. 4.The correlations between high school student's explanatory style and their concurrent and future depression tendency were salient. Many suggestions was prompted according to the results and it's discussions.
期刊論文
1.Hilsman, Ruth、Garber, Judy(1995)。A test of the cognitive diathesis-stress model of depression in children: Academic stressors, attributional style, perceived competence, and control。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，69(2)，370-380。  new window
2.Peterson Christopher、Barrett, Lisa C.(1988)。Explanatory Style and Academic Performance among University Freshmen。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，53(3)，603-607。  new window
3.Metalsky, G. I.、Halberstadt, L. J.、Abramson, Lyn Y.(1987)。Vulnerability to depressive mood reactions: toward a more powerful test of the diathesis-stress and causal mediation components of the reformulated theory of depression。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，52(2)，386-393。  new window
4.Peterson, C.、Seligman, M. E. P.、Kaslow, N. J.、Tanenbaum, R. L.、Alloy, Lauren B.、Abramson, Lyn Y.(1984)。Explanatory style and depressive symptoms among school children。Journal of Abnormal Psychology，93(2)，235-238。  new window
5.Peterson, Christopher(1988)。Explanatory style as a risk factor for illness。Cognitive Therapy and Research，12(2)，119-132。  new window
6.Seligman, M. E.、Schulman, P.(1986)。Explanatory style as a predictor of productivity and quitting among life insurance sales agents。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，50，832-838。  new window
7.Nolen-Hoeksema, S.、Girgus, J. S.、Seligman, M. E. P.(1986)。Learned helplessness in children: A longitudinal study of depression, achievement, and explanatory style。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，51(2)，435-442。  new window
8.Nolen-Hoeksema, S.、Girgus, J. S.、Seligman, M. E. P.(1992)。Predictors and consequences of childhood depressive symptoms: A 5-year longitudinal study。Journal of Abnormal Psychology，101(3)，405-422。  new window
9.Abramson, L. Y.、Seligman, M. E. P.、Teasdale, J. D.(1978)。Learned Helplessness in Humans: Critique and Reformulation。Journal of Abnormal Psychology，87(1)，49-74。  new window
10.Sweeney, Paul D.、Anderson, Karen、Bailey, Scott(198605)。Attributional style in Depression: a meta-analytic review。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，50(5)，974-991。  new window
11.Abramson, L. Y.、Metalsky, G. I.、Alloy, L. B.(1989)。Hopelessness depression: A theory-based subtype of depression。Psychological Review，96(2)，358-372。  new window
12.魏麗敏(19941200)。憂鬱量表的編製及其在輔導上的應用。諮商與輔導，108，15-19。  延伸查詢new window
13.Peterson, Christopher、Seligman, Martin E. P.、Vaillant, George E.(1988)。Pessimistic explanatory style is a risk factor for physical illness: A thirty-five-year longitudinal study。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，55(1)，23-27。  new window
14.Aydin, G.(1988)。The remediation of children's helpless explanatory and related unpopularity。Cognitive Therapy and Research，12(2)，155-165。  new window
15.Seligman, M. E. P.、Burns, M. O.(1989)。Explanatory style across the life span: Evidence for stability over 52 years。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，56(3)，471-477。  new window
16.Carver, Charles S.(1989)。How should multifaceted personality constructs be tested? Issues illustrated by self-monitoring, attributional style, and hardiness。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，56(4)，577-585。  new window
17.Dykema, J.、Bergbower, K.、Doctora, J. D.、Peterson, C.(1996)。An attributional style questionnaire for general use。Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment，14，100-108。  new window
18.Joiner, T. E.、Metalsky, G. I.(1999)。Factorial construct validity of the extended attributional style questionnaire。Cognitive Therapy and Research，23(1)，105-113。  new window
19.Peterson, C.、Luborsky, L.、Seligman, M. E. P.(1983)。Attributions and depressive mood shifts: A case study using the symptom-context method。Journal of Abnormal Psychology，92(1)，96-103。  new window
20.Thompson, M.、Kaslow, N. J.、Weiss, B.、Nolen-Hoeksema, S.(1998)。Children's attributional style questionnaire-revised: psychometric examination。Psychological Assessment，10(2)，166-170。  new window
研究報告
1.張素凰(1992)。憂鬱性歸因理論前瞻性研究方式的驗證--以大學生為樣本的探討 (計畫編號：NSC81-0301-H-002-522)。沒有紀錄：行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃裕達(1992)。憂鬱症的歸因向度與歸因複雜度探討(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.盧美凡(1995)。大學生之憂鬱性歸因與知覺：憂鬱性歸因理論的驗證(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.徐佩君(2000)。父母管教方式、解釋風格、負向家庭生活經驗與兒童解釋風格之相關分析(碩士論文)。彰化師範大學，彰化。  延伸查詢new window
4.張玉玲(2000)。尋找挑戰難題、打死不退的學生：國中學生解釋風格、自尊、學業失敗忍受力與挑戰學業難題行為之研究(碩士論文)。彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃慧貞(1982)。生活壓力歸因型及社會支援與大學生的憂鬱症(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.李宗憲(1998)。國小高年級原住民與漢民族學生習得無助感及其相關因素之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立師範大學，臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.曾光佩(1993)。大學生的憂鬱與歸因：憂鬱性歸因理論之驗證，0。  延伸查詢new window
8.金珮玲(1991)。血液透析病患的歸因組型與憂鬱－憂鬱性歸因理論的驗證，0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.教育部(2000)。臺閩地區國民中小學校概況統計。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.Corey, G. F.(1996)。Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy。Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy。Pacific Grove, Calif.：International Thomson Publishing Company。  new window
3.Reivich, K.(1995)。The measurement of explanatory style。Explanatory style。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
單篇論文
1.林清文(2001)。不適應與偏差行為的經驗認知理論模式。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(2000)。臺閩地區高級中等學校概況統計（八十八學年度），臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Peterson, C.、Buchanan, G. M.、Seligman, M. E. P.(1995)。Explanatory style: History and evolution of the field。Explanatory style。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：892（臺灣：880，外國：12） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1806188 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67599286
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上