資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.188.148.71)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
美國勞資集體協商制度之法律政策分析
書刊名:
歐美研究
作者:
吳育仁
作者(外文):
Wu, Yu-jen
出版日期:
2002
卷期:
32:2
頁次:
頁209-269
主題關鍵詞:
集體協商
;
工會承認
;
專屬協商代表權
;
公平代表義務
;
誠信協商義務
;
Collective bargaining
;
Union recognition
;
Exclusively bargaining representatives
;
The duty to represent fairly
;
The duty to bargain in good faith
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
8
) 博士論文(
2
) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
6
共同引用:0
點閱:90
從整體工業關系的角度,美國勞資集體協商制度具有法制性、民主性、對立性、以及公權介入等特色。但是,支撐美國集體協商制度的勞工法律政策有何具體特徵呢?它背後隱藏的啟示經驗和理論意涵究竟為何呢?作者從美國集體協商制度中的權利義務的建立出發,到權利義務關係的終止,討論和分析美國集體協商制度之法律政策,並以批判思考的角度,論述可供參考的經驗及引申的涵義。最後,本文歸納出四點重要的具體特徵:集體協商關係的高度法制化(特別是程序性規範)、以嚴格的政治民主程序來規制代表權的形成和行使、對立模式的制度造成勞資雙方彼此對抗和利益衝突、公權力嚴格地介入集體協商程序。這四大主因直接或間接影響美國集體協商制度的發展。
以文找文
In light of comparative industrial relations, the rights and duties in relationships of collective bargaining between employers and unions in the USA can be characterized as legalism, democracy, conflict and state intervention. However, what are the substantial features of the legal policies regulating collective bargaining in the USA? What are the empirical experiences and theoretical implications behind such legal policies? Based on a critical approach, the author explores the rise and decline of collective bargaining by addressing rights and duties in collective bargaining from the establishment to the termination of relationships between employers and unions. The article concludes by outlining four factors operative in the development of collective bargaining in the USA: highly legalistic relationships, regulation of exclusively representative rights by rigidly democratical processes, an adversarial model that leads to confrontation and conflicts of interest between employers and employees, and highly public interventions in collective bargaining procedures.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Wood, S.、Godard, J.(1999)。The Statutory Union Recognition Procedure in the Employment Relations Bill: A Comparative Analysis。British Journal of Industrial Relations,37(2),203-245。
2.
Traxler, Franz(1996)。Collective Bargaining and Industrial Change: A Case of Disorganization? A Comparative Analysis of Eighteen OECD Countries。European Sociological Review,12(3),271-287。
3.
Bartosic, F.、Hartley, R.(1972)。The employer's duty to supply information to the union。Cornell Law Review,58,23-43。
4.
Block, R.(1997)。Rethinking the national labor relations act and zero-sum labor law: An industrial Relations View。Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law,18(1),30-55。
5.
Corocan, L.、Wareing, A.(1994)。Trade union recognition data from the 1993 labour force survey。Employment Gazette,102(12),441-451。
6.
Cox, Archibald(1958)。The duty to bargain in good faith。Harvard Law Review,71(8),1401-1442。
7.
Flanders, Allan(1974)。The tradition of voluntarism。British Journal of Industrial Relations,12(3),352-370。
8.
Rose, J.、Chaison, G.(1996)。Linking union density and union effectiveness: The North American experience。Industrial Relations,35(1),78-106。
9.
Strauss, G.(1995)。Is the new deal system collapsing? With what might it be replaced?。Industrial Relations,34(3),329-350。
10.
Townley, F.(1987)。Union recognition: A comparative analysis of the pros and cons of a legal procedure。British Journal of Industrial Relations,25(2),177-200。
圖書
1.
Bartosic, Florian、Hartley, Roger C.(1986)。Labor relations law in the private sector。Pennsylvania:American Law Institute-American Bar Association, Committee on Continuing Professional Education。
2.
Gorman, Robert A.(1976)。Basic text on labor law: Unionization and collective bargaining。West Publishing。
3.
Smith, R. R.(1987)。The bargaining book。Huntsville, AL:Federal Personnel Management Institute, Inc.。
4.
Dorsey, James E.(1983)。Canada labour relations board: Federal law and practice。Toronto, Canada:The Carswell Company。
5.
Morris, Charles J.(1987)。American Labor Policy: A Critical Appraisal of the National Labor Relations Act.。Washington, DC:Bureau of National Affairs。
6.
Department of Trade and Industry(1998)。Fairness at Work。Fairness at Work。London, UK:Department of Trade and Industry。
7.
Gould, William B.(1993)。Agenda for Reform: The Future of Employment Relationships and the Law。Cambridge:MIT Press。
8.
Kochan, Thomas A.、Katz, Harry C.(1988)。Collective Bargaining and Industrial Relations。Homewood, IL:IRWIN。
9.
Bean, R.(1994)。Comparative Industrial Relations: An Introduction to Cross-national Perspectives。London:Routledge。
10.
Kochan, Thomas A.、Katz, Harry C.、McKersie, Robert B.(1986)。The Transformation of American Industrial Relations。New York:Basic Books。
11.
Sisson, Keith(1987)。The Management of Collective Bargaining: An International Comparison。Oxford:Basil Blackwell。
12.
Baer, W.(1989)。Collective bargaining: Custom and practice。Collective bargaining: Custom and practice。North Carolina。
13.
Begin, J.、Bear, E.(1989)。The practice of collective bargaining。The practice of collective bargaining。Boston, MA。
14.
Block, R.、Beck, J.、Krueger, D.(1996)。Labor law, industrial relations, and employee choice。Labor law, industrial relations, and employee choice。Kalamazoo, MI。
15.
Carrell, B.、Heavrin, C.(1988)。Collective bargaining and labor relations。Collective bargaining and labor relations。Ohio。
16.
(1968)。Royal commission on trade unions and employers association。Royal commission on trade unions and employers association。London, UK。
17.
(1988)。Employee and union member: Guide to the labor law。Employee and union member: Guide to the labor law。New York, NY。
18.
Gorman, R.(1976)。Labor law: Unionization and collective bargaining。Labor law: Unionization and collective bargaining。Minn.。
19.
Katz, H.、Darbishire, O.(2000)。Converging divergences: Worldwide changes in employment systems。Converging divergences: Worldwide changes in employment systems。Ithaca, NY。
20.
Larson, Simeon、Nissen, Bruce(1987)。Theories of the Labor Movement。Detroit, MI:Wayne State University Press。
21.
Murphy, W.(1987)。Establishment and disestablishment of union representation。American labor policy: A critical appraisal of the National Labor Relations Act。Washington, DC。
22.
Perlman, S.(1971)。A theory of the labor movement。A theory of the labor movement。N. Y.。
23.
Slimkin, W.、Fidandis, N.(1986)。Mediation and the dynamics of collective bargaining。Washington, DC:Bureau of National Affairs。
24.
Taras, F.(1997)。Collective bargaining in Canada and the United States: Divergent cultures, divergent outcomes。Government regulation of the employment relations。Madison, WI。
25.
Trades Union Congress(1995)。Representation at work: A TUC Consultative report。Representation at work: A TUC Consultative report。London, UK。
26.
Trades Union Congress(1995)。Your voice at work: TUC proposals for rights to representation at work。London, UK:Trades Union Congress。
27.
Twomey, D.(1989)。Labor & Employment Law: Text & Cases。Labor & Employment Law: Text & Cases。Illinois。
28.
Yates, M.(1994)。Power on the job: The legal rights of working people。Power on the job: The legal rights of working people。Boston, MA。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
團體協商必要資料提供之實務現況與發展
2.
複數工會團體協商代表制之法律問題探討--以美日韓法制為線索
3.
臺灣團體協商制度之變動與發展--以實務發展為中心
4.
美國工會承認之法律政策--陷入制度性困境?
5.
美國學區集體協商機制與議題之研究:公共部門勞資關係之觀點
6.
臺灣集體協商法律政策之分析
7.
論勞動三權理論基礎與我國工會法修正方向--以美國工會法制發展角度觀察
8.
中、美、英教育部門集體協商僵局解決制度之比較研究--以替代性爭議解決方案(ADR)為核心
1.
拒絕團體協商之不當勞動行為-日本與台灣之學理分析及實踐經驗比較
2.
公務員勞動三權之行使與限制﹘以我國公務人員協會為案例之分析
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code