臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：政治權力、政治權威與政治義務
書刊名：政治與社會哲學評論
作者：謝世民 引用關係
作者(外文)：Shei,Ser-min
出版日期：2002
卷期：1
頁次：頁1-41
主題關鍵詞：遵守法律的道德義務；政治義務；國家存在的正當性；政治權威的正當性；政治權力的正當性；雷茲；鐸肯；Moral obligation to obey the law；Political obligation；The legitimacy of the state；The legitimacy of political authority；The legitimacy of political power；Joseph Raz；Ronald Dworkin
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(5) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:129
在什麼條件下，我們每個人都有遵守法律的道德義務?這是所謂政治義務的問題。本文將政治義務的問題與三種正當性問題區分開來，並對政治義務的成立基礎，提出一種可能的答案。根據本文的分析，在政治論述中，正當性問題可能指: (1) 國家存在的正當性問題 (2) 政治權威的正當性問題，以及(3)政治權力的正當性問題。本文考察了這三層意思的正當性與政治義務的關餘，指出每一種正當性作為政治義務之基礎的限制。針對政治權威的正當性與政治義務之關像，本文考察了英國哲學家雷茲 (Joseph Raz) 的主要論點。本文 最後論誰:當國家克盡對其社會成員的道德義務時，社會成員便有政治義務，而且在社會成員沒有 ( 表示 ) 同意要服從國家的統治之情況下，僅當國家克盡對其社會成員的道億義務時，社會成員才有政治義務。本文同時也簡略地討論了美國哲學家鐸肯 (Ronald Dworkin ) 的「原則一貫性」理論。鐸肯將政治義務的證成視為比較根本的任務，認為政治權力的正當性必須訴諸政治義務來說明。本文接受鐸肯的觀點，並將鐸肯的「原則一貫性」理論與「國家克盡對其社會成員的道德義務」這項條件接軌，試圖為政治義務的成立基礎提出有別於同意論的分析架構。
Under what conditions, do citizens, if they do, have a moral obligation to obey the law? This is the problem of political obligation, which 1 argue should be distinguished from the problem of legitimacy. There are three contexts in which the problem of legitimacy may arise. It may concern with the legitimacy of the existence of the state, the legitimacy of political authorities, or the legitimacy of political powers. In this paper 1 examine the relation between these three types of legitimacy and political obligation. It is argued that all of them fall short of providing the grounds for political obligation. 1 reconstruct Joseph Raz’s view of authority and his analysis of the grounds of legitimate political authorities, to show that obligation to obey the law based on legitimate political authorities is limited and relative to individuals' capacities and circumstances. The main thesis is of this paper is that when the state fulfills its moral obligations toward citizens (to a certain extent), citizens acquire the moral obligation to obey its laws, and that only when the state fulfills its moral obligations toward citizens (to a certain extent), will those citizens who do not consent to obey the state have political obligation. This paper is meant to offer an alternative to the consent theory for understanding political obligation. My argument appeals to the ideal of integrity, as defended by Ronald Dworkin in his Law’s Empire.
期刊論文
1.Waldron, Jeremy(1987)。Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism。The Philosophical Quarterly，37，127-150。  new window
2.Dworkin, Ronald(1981)。What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources。Philosophy & Public Affairs，10(4)，283-345。  new window
3.Dworkin, Ronald(1981)。What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare。Philosophy & Public Affairs，10(3)，185-246。  new window
4.Simmons, A. J.(1996)。Associative Political Obligations。Ethics，106(2)，247-273。  new window
5.Simmons, A. John(1999)。Justification and Legitimacy。Ethics，109(4)，739-771。  new window
6.Dworkin, Ronald(1981)。What Is Equality? Part Ⅰ: Equality of Welfare。Philosophy and Public Affairs，10。  new window
7.Simmons, A. John(1996)。Associative Political Obligations。Ethics，106(2)。  new window
8.Simmons, A. John(1996)。Justification and Legitimacy。Ethics，109(4)。  new window
學位論文
1.Habermas, Jürgen、Lawrence, Frederick(1987)。The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures(-)，Cambridge, Mass。  new window
圖書
1.Scanlon, T.(1998)。What We Owe to Each Other。Cambridge, MA：The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
2.Zukin, Sharon、DiMaggio, Paul(1990)。Introduction。Structures of capital: the social organization of the economy。Cambridge England：New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Green, Leslie(1988)。The Authority of the State。Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Raz, Joseph(1990)。Practical Reason and Norms。Practical Reason and Norms。Princeton。  new window
5.Locke, J.(1988)。Two treaties of government。London：Routhedge。  new window
6.Rawls, John(2001)。Justice as Fairness: A Restatement。Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
7.Raz, Joseph(1988)。The Morality of Freedom。New York, NY：Clarendon Press。  new window
8.Dworkin, Ronald(1986)。Law's Empire。Cambridge, Mass.：Harvard University Press。  new window
9.Rawls, John(2001)。Justice as Fairness: A Restatement。Cambridge, Massachusetts：Harvard University Press。  new window
10.Larmore, Charles E.(1996)。The Morals of Modernity。Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.Rawls, John(1993)。Political Liberalism。Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.Rawls, John(1999)。A Theory of Justice。Harvard University Press。  new window
13.Dworkin, Ronald(1986)。Law's Empire。Cambridge, MA：Belknap Press。  new window
14.Christiano, T.(1998)。The Rule of the Many。The Rule of the Many。Boulder, CO。  new window
15.Morris, C.(1988)。An Essay on the Modern State。An Essay on the Modern State。Cambridge。  new window
16.Simmons, A. John(1979)。Moral Principles and Political Obligations。Princeton University Press。  new window
17.Simmons, A. J.(2001)。Justification and Legitimacy。Justification and Legitimacy。Cambridge。  new window
18.Wolff, R. P.(1970)。In Defense of Anarchy。In Defense of Anarchy。New York, NY。  new window
19.Raz, Joseph(1990)。Practical Reason and Norms。Practical Reason and Norms。Princeton, NJ。  new window
20.Christiano, Thomas(1998)。The rule of the Many。The rule of the Many。Boulder, Colo.。  new window
21.Green, Leslie(1988)。The Authority of the Satate。The Authority of the Satate。Oxford。  new window
22.Morris, Christopher(1988)。An Essay on the Modern State。An Essay on the Modern State。Cambridge。  new window
23.Raz, Joseph(1990)。Authority。Authority。Oxford。  new window
24.Simmons, A. John(1979)。Moral Principles and Political Obligations。Moral Principles and Political Obligations。Princeton。  new window
25.Simmons, A. John(2001)。Justification and Legitimacy。Justification and Legitimacy。Cambridge。  new window
26.Wolff, Robert Paul(1970)。In Defense of Anarchy。In Defense of Anarchy。New York。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：510（臺灣：509，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1498098 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67295400
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上