:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:乾綱獨御、乾綱獨斷--康熙、雍正二帝君權思想的一個側面
書刊名:漢學研究
作者:何冠彪
作者(外文):Ho, Koon-piu
出版日期:2002
卷期:20:2=41
頁次:頁275-300
主題關鍵詞:清聖祖清世宗清高宗君權乾綱獨攬Emperor K'ang-hsiEmperor Yung-chengEmperor Ch'ien-lungSovereign powerCh'ien-kang tu-lan
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:49
清高宗喜以「乾綱獨攬」為名,推行其專制政策。論者遂以此詞,作為乾隆朝獨裁政治之標識。實則高宗之君權思想,承襲其祖聖祖及其父世宗而來。聖祖倡言「乾綱獨御」、「乾綱獨斷」,世宗亦言「乾綱獨斷」,以為其政治口號。 清代君主申明其帝王角色與權貴者,始於聖祖。聖祖之帝王意識甚強,且喜向中外臣民揭示其為萬姓之主。其君權思想約在康熙十年代至二十年代初形成,此後不容有人覬覦其乾綱,即親如皇太子,亦不例外。為確保乾綱不墮,聖祖晚年既廢皇太子,且堅持不再建儲。 世宗即位後,繼承聖祖之統治方針,又借其事例,為己之專制政策張本。世宗揚言可以一人之力治天下,聲稱可代理大學士所應為之事,八旗大臣之家事,甚或部、院、衛門諸臣不能辦理之事。
Emperor Ch’ien-lung had used the term “Ch’ien-kang tu-lan” 乾綱獨攬 (sovereign power should be grasped solely by the emperor) so often to justify his autocratic rule that the term has now become a common label to denote the autocracy of the Ch’ien-lung era by modem scholars. It is important to note that both the term itself and the Emperor’ s concepts of sovereign power were inherited from his grandfather Emperor K’ang-hsi and his father Emperor Yung-cheng, who had already used similar terms such as “ch’ien-kang tu- yü” 乾綱獨御 (sovereign power should only be exercised by the emperor), and “ch’ ien-kang tu-tuan” 乾綱獨斷 (state affairs should only be decided by the emperor) as their slogans. Emperor K’ang-hsi was the first Ch'ing emperor who gave a clear and thorough account of his role and responsibility as an emperor. He strongly identified himself as the ruler of China and loved to constantly remind his subjects the same. Emperor K’ang-his’s ideas of himself being the supreme sovereign were formulated during the second and third decades of his reign. Since then, he did not tolerate any slight challenge to his sovereignty from any subjects including his crown prince. In order to uphold his sovereignty, he even deposed his crown prince and refused to appoint a new one. Emperor Yung-cheng modeled his mode of rule after his father’s and justified his own autocratic rule by his father’ s as well. With a vision of demonstrating his almightiness as befitting a supreme sovereign, he boasted that he was at once able to perform the duties for his grand-secretaries, to manage the family affairs for his bannerman officials, and to handle those government businesses, that even the officials of the Six Ministries and the Censorate found hard or impossible to tackle.
圖書
1.聖祖仁皇帝實錄。  延伸查詢new window
2.雍正硃批諭旨。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉昫(1975)。舊唐書。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.牛鈕(1983)。日講易經解義。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.中國第一歷史檔案館(1991)。乾隆朝上諭檔。檔案出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.趙爾巽、啟功(1977)。清史稿。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.庫勒納、中國第一歷史檔案館(1984)。康熙起居注。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.世宗憲皇帝上諭內閣。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(1987)。國朝宮史,0。  延伸查詢new window
2.中國第一歷史檔案館。乾隆朝上諭檔(第十二冊)。  延伸查詢new window
3.(清)曹振鏞(1985)。清實錄(仁宗睿皇帝實錄),北京。  延伸查詢new window
4.玄燁。聖祖仁皇帝御製文集(第二集)。  延伸查詢new window
5.格爾古德(1983)。日講四書解義,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.庫勒納(1983)。日講書經解義,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.(清)葉方譪。御定孝經衍義。  延伸查詢new window
8.(清)毛奇齡。毛西河全集。  延伸查詢new window
9.聖祖仁皇帝起居注冊。  延伸查詢new window
10.玄燁。聖祖仁皇帝御製文集(第四集)。  延伸查詢new window
11.中國第一歷史檔案館。雍正朝起居注冊,北京。  延伸查詢new window
12.中國第一歷史檔案館。乾隆朝上諭檔(第一冊)。  延伸查詢new window
13.乾隆朝上諭檔(第二冊),北京。  延伸查詢new window
14.乾隆朝上諭檔(第三冊)。  延伸查詢new window
15.乾隆朝上諭檔(第九冊)。  延伸查詢new window
16.(清)王掞(1996)。萬壽盛典,北京。  延伸查詢new window
17.(清)愛新覺羅胤禛(1969)。大義覺迷錄,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top