本文分析了由法國歷史學者夏堤葉所提出的兩種歷史詮釋模式：「康德－哈伯瑪斯模式」以及「柯欽－弗雷模式」。此兩種不同的模式對於啟蒙運動與法國大革命的連結性作出了不同的詮釋，本文試圖分析此兩種模式之理論與概念，以及達頓與夏堤葉的學術爭論。

This Article is trying to analyze two different models of historical interpretations, one is “Kant-Habermas model”, and the other is “Cochin-Furet model”, according to Roger Chartier. These two models have different focus about the link between the Enlightenment and the French Revolution, and these for lead to different research results. I try to point out these two different models' theories and ideas, and the debates between Robert Darnton and Roger Chartier.