資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.225.32.206)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
美國百年科學教育的發展
書刊名:
教育資料與研究
作者:
邱美虹
/
周金城
作者(外文):
Chiu, Mei-hung
/
Chou, Chin-cheng
出版日期:
2005
卷期:
64
頁次:
頁19-40
主題關鍵詞:
科學教育
;
科學課程
;
科學素養
;
Science education
;
Science curriculum
;
Scientific literacy
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
4
) 博士論文(
4
) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
4
共同引用:0
點閱:155
本論文主要是回顧美國自二十世紀初開始發展的科學教育的任務與理想,其中歷經兩次世界大戰與美蘇冷戰時期後,影響科學教育目標的轉變,而八○年代開始重視全民科學素養的目標,也影響現今21世紀襖期的科學教育發展。由於時間上跨過百年,要詳細討論不容易,故本文主要引用美國教育年鑑中對科學教育內容進行討論,再佐以相關文獻,並將科學教育的發展分成三個階段:第一階段是科學教育形成期:探討影響50年代中期以前的科學教育形成的沿革。第二階段是專業科學的教育發展期:探討由50年代中期以後至80年代之前科學教育的發展,此階段的目標是培育科學家,因此也發展出相當多的科學教育課程方案(如SAPA、ESS、SCIS、PSSC、BSCS、CHEMS等)。第三階段是全民科學素養拓展期:由80年代開始直到現今21世紀初期,則以影響較大的幾個科學教育方案(如STS,2061計畫,美國國家科學教育標準)來貫穿全文。在回顧相關文獻後,我們發現美國的科學教育發展目標主要在回應社會不同的需求,以及科技發展所需的人才培育,最終美國期望藉由科學教育之發展,讓自身能夠保持在世界領先的主導地位。
以文找文
The main purpose of this article is to review literature in science education in the United States for the past one hundred years. In particular, we are interested in understanding what goals and visions were since the beginning of 20the century. It was quite difficult to cover all the topics happened or discussed for such a long time. Therefore, we made use of the yearbooks (3rd, 31st, 46th, and 59th) of National society for the Study of Education to organize the first part structure of the article and then we categorized the entire period into three phases for discussions. The first phase was the formation of science education. It discussed the origin and impact of forming science education field. This period was ranged form 1903 to the mid of 1950s. The second phase was the development of specific disciplines in science domains. It aimed to educate students to be scientists. Therefore, many science curricula were developed to meet the needs (e.g., SAPA, ESS, SCIS, PSSC, BSCS, CHEMS). This period covered form 1950s to 1980s. The third phase was the extension of science education to all Americans. We introduced several influential projects, such as STS, Project 2061, and NSES, to shed some light of our understanding of science education in the transition between he 20th and the 21st centuries. After reviewing the literature, we found the reform of science education was to respond to the various needs of the changing society and manpower for the technological decades. At last, the findings revealed that the US wishes to keep their leading position in the world via improving their science education outcomes in many ways.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Berger, C. F.(1979)。What are the implications of paradigme research for science education research?。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,16(6),517-521。
2.
DeBoer, G. E.(2000)。Scientific Literacy: Another Look at Its Historical and Contemporary Meanings and Its Relationship to Science Education Reform。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37,582-601。
3.
Gil-Perez, D.(1996)。New Trends in science education。International Journal of Science Education,18(8),889-901。
4.
Gil-Perez, D.(1983)。Tres paradigmas basicos de la ensenanza de las ciencias。Ensenanza de las Ciencias,1(1),26-33。
5.
Hodson, D.(1985)。Philosophy of science, science and science education。Studies in Science Education,12,25-57。
6.
Hofstein, A.、Yager, R. E.(1982)。Societal issues as organizers for science education in the 80s。Science and Mathematic,82(7),539-547。
7.
Klopfer, L. E.(1983)。Research and the crisis in science education。Science Education,67(3),283-284。
8.
Kromhout, R.、Good, R.(1983)。Beware of societal issues as organizers for science education。School Science and Mathematics,83,647-650。
9.
Millar, R.、Driver, R.(1987)。Beyond processes。Studies in Science Education,14,33-62。
10.
Posner, G. J.、Strike, K. A.、Hewson, P. W.、Gertzog, W. A.(1982)。Accomodation of a scientific conception:Toward a theory of conceptual change。Science Education,66,211-227。
11.
Ratcliff, M.(2001)。Science,Technology and Society in school science education。School Science Review,82(300),83-92。
12.
Ravitch, D.(1993)。Launching a revolution in standards and assessments。Phi Delta Kappan,74(10),767-772。
13.
Rosen, S.(1956)。The rise of high-school chemistry in America。Journal of chemical Education,33(12),627-633。
14.
Solomon, J.(1981)。STS for science children。New Scientist,89,77-78。
15.
Abimbola, I. O.(1988)。The Problem of Terminology in the Study of Student Conceptions in Science。Science Education,72(2),175-184。
16.
National Science Teachers Association(1971)。NSTA position statement on school science education for the 70's。The Science Teacher,38,46-51。
17.
Shulman, Lee S.(1987)。Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform。Harvard Educational Review,57(1),1-23。
會議論文
1.
Hollenbeck, J. E.(2003)。Using a constructivist strategy and STS methodology to teach science with the humanities。The International Conference on Science,Mathematics,and Technology Education,East London,South Africa,(會議日期: 2003/01/15-01/18)。
圖書
1.
American Association for the Advancement of Science(2000)。Designs for Science Literacy。New York:Oxford University Press。
2.
Cremin, L.(1964)。The transformation of the school。New York:Vintage。
3.
DeBoer, G. E.(1991)。A history of ideas in science education。New York:Teachers College。
4.
Hogben, L. T.(1942)。Science for the citizen:A self-educator based on the social background of scientific discovery。London:George Allen。
5.
Husen, T.、Postlethwaite, T. N.(1994)。The international encyclopedia of education。Elsevier Science Ltd.。
6.
Jackman, W.(1904)。Nature Study,The Third Yearbook of the National Society for the Scientific Study of Education。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。
7.
King, K. P.(2001)。Technology,science teaching,and literacy:A century of growth。New York:Kluwer Academic Publishers。
8.
National Education Association(1920)。Reorganization of science in Secondary Schools:A report of the commission on the reorganization of secondary education。Washington,DC:U.S.Government Printing Office。
9.
National Society for the Study of Education(1932)。A program for teaching science。Thirty-first yearbook of the NSSE。Bloomington,IL:Public School Publishing Company。
10.
National Society for the Study of Education(1947)。Science education in American schools: Forty-sixth yearbook of the NSSE。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。
11.
National Society for the Study of Education(1960)。Rethinking science education: Fifty-ninth yearbook of the NSSE。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。
12.
Novak, J.、Gowin, D. B.(1989)。Learning how to learn in Thai。Bangkok:National Research Council。
13.
Omstein, A. C.、Hunkins, F. P.(1998)。Curriculum-foundations, principle, and issues。Boston:Allyn and Bacon。
14.
Rutherford, F. J.、Ahlgren, A.(1990)。Science for all Americans。New York:Oxford University Press。
15.
The National Commission on Excellence in Education(1983)。A Nation at Risk:The Imperative for Educational Reform。Washington,DC:Author。
16.
U. S. Department of Education(1994)。Goals 2000:Educate America Act。Washington:Department of Education。
17.
U. S. Department of Education(2001)。No Child Left Behind Act of 2001。Washington, DC:Department of Education。
18.
教育部(2003)。科學教育白皮書。教育部。
延伸查詢
19.
Bruner, J. S.(1960)。The process of education。New York, NY:Vintage Books。
20.
教育部(2002)。創造力教育白皮書。臺北:教育部。
延伸查詢
21.
National Research Council(1996)。National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。
22.
American Association for the Advancement of Science(1993)。Benchmarks for science literacy。Oxford University Press。
其他
1.
U. S. Department of Education(2005)。Spellings,discusses"New Path for No Child Left Behind"policy with elementary school principals,http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2005/04/04182005.html, 2005/04/04。
圖書論文
1.
Bybee, R. W.、DeBoer, G. E.(1994)。Research on goals for the science curriculum。Handbook of research on science teaching and learning。New York:Macmillan Publishing Company。
2.
Ellis, J. D.(2001)。The influence of the NSES on the Science Education。Investigating the Influence of Standards: A Framework for Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education。Washington, D.C:National Academies Press。
3.
Rosenthal, D. B.(1985)。Biology education in a social and moral context。Science Technology Society:1985 Yearbook of the National Science Teachers Association。Washington,DC。
4.
Strike, K. A.、Posner, G. J.(1985)。A conceptual change view of learning and understanding。Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change。Orlando, FL:Academic Press。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
How Science Museum Can Support Science Teacher Professional Development for the New Science Curriculum
2.
科學素養教育在澳門--中學自然科學基本學力要求研制過程追述
3.
臺灣所需優先解決的科學教育問題--科學與科學教育學者的觀點
4.
從國小自然科學課程發展脈絡看科學素養的教學
5.
兒童的課程理解--以自然與生活科技學習領域為例
6.
兒童眼中的自然與生活科技學習領域:與兒童對話後的理解
7.
臺灣公私立大學通識教育課程規劃現況分析
8.
從高中課程綱要探討大學入學考試的生物科試題設計
9.
科學教育應如何提升學生的科學素養--臺灣學術精英的看法
10.
臺灣小學的科學教育發展與探討
11.
教師如何引領幼兒學習科學
1.
社會性科學議題桌遊的設計與實踐
2.
建構國小科學本質學習要項與教學研究
3.
台灣國小數理教師「以學習者為中心」數理教學專業能力自我知覺之探討
4.
專題講座對於高中學生科學學習之研究
1.
科學素養與科學本質
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code