A Three-World Model of Political Communication: Public Opinion, Elite Opinion and Public Policy in Taiwan, 1996-2000_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	A Three-World Model of Political Communication: Public Opinion, Elite Opinion and Public Policy in Taiwan, 1996-2000
書刊名：	中國行政評論
作者：	余致力
作者(外文)：	Yu, Chilik
出版日期：	2005
卷期：	15:1
頁次：	頁29-54
主題關鍵詞：	Three-world model；Political communication；Public opinion；Elite opinion；Public policy；Taiwan studies；調適；發展行政；行政發展；省縣自治法；凍省；三元體系
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:44

台灣政府的政策抉擇與一般民意及菁英意見之一致程度究竟有多高，是本文所擬探討的研究問題。透過蒐集1996年至2000年在台灣針對113項政策議題所進行的549則政策民調資料，本研究比較一般民眾的意見與政府的政策抉擇之一致程度，其結果顯示，有48%的政策抉擇與多數民眾的偏好一致。本研究亦蒐集了同時期以菁英為對象，針對87項政策議題所進行的189則意見調查資料，經分析比較發現，有54%的政策抉擇與多數菁英之偏好一致。將這兩組資料相結合，本研究界定出41項政策議題，在1996-2000年間曾經同時針對一般民眾與菁英進行意見調查。針對這41項有明確民眾意見與菁英意見的政策議題，本研究分析發現：(一)政府政策與多數民眾及多數菁英的意見一致者，共有20項，佔49%；(二)政府政策與多數民眾意見一致但與多數菁英意見不一致者，共有6項，估的%；(三)政府政策與多數菁英意見一致但與多數民眾意見不一致者，共計5項，佔12%；(四)政府政策與多數民眾及多數菁英的意見均不一致者，共計10項，佔24%。依據上述研究結果，本研究建構出一個「三個世界模型」以描述與解釋台灣政策形成與政治傳播的現象。在台灣的政策形成與政治傳播應該是有三個世界一民眾(the public )、菁英(the elite )與掌權者(the leadership echelons) ，而三者間的互動關係，為台灣各項政策抉擇描繪出一幅複雜的圖像。

以文找文

To what extent have the policy choices of the Taiwan government been consistent with the opinions of the public and the elite? Using the results of 549 policy opinion surveys, public opinion was compared with actual policy decisions on 113 issues from 1996 through 2000. Public policy decisions were consistent with the preferences of the majority of the public on 48 percent of the cases. As for the comparison between elite opinion and public policy, this research collected data from 189 policy opinion surveys on 87 issues, again from 1996 through 2000. Public policy decisions were consistent with the preferences of the majority of the elite on 54 percent of the cases. By combining these data, this research identified 41 issues on which both public and elite opinion surveys have been conducted and found: (1) government decisions were consistent with the preferences of the majority of both the public and elite on 20 cases (about 49 percent); (2) government decisions on 6 cases (about 15 percent) were consistent with the preferences of the majority of the public but not consistent with those of the majority of the elite; (3) government decisions on 5 cases (about 12 percent) were consistent with the preferences of the majority of the elite but not consistent with the majority of public opinion; (4) government decisions on 10 cases (about 24 percent) were inconsistent with the preferences of the majority of both the elite and of the public. Since government decisions were made by the leadership echelons, this paper develops a three-world model to describe and explain policy formulation and political communication in Taiwan: the public, the elite, and the leadership echelons together paint a complicated picture of preference consistency on various policy issues.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Davis, O. A.、Hinich, M. J.、Ordeshook, P. C.(1970)。An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process。American Political Science Review，64，426-448。
2.	Jacobs, L. R.、Shapiro, R. Y.(1995)。Issues, Candidate Image and Priming: The Use of Private Polls in Kennedy's1960 Presidential Campaign。American Political Science Review，88，527-540。
3.	Page, B. I.、Shapiro, R. Y.(1983)。Effects of Public Opinion on Policy。American Journal of Political Science，77，175-190。
4.	Isaacs, M.(1998)。Two Different Worlds: The Relationship Between Elite and Mass Opinion on American Foreign Policy。Political Communication，15(3)，323-345。
5.	Monroe, Alan D.(1979)。Consistency between Policy Preferences and National Policy Decisions。American Politics Quarterly，7(1)，3-19。
6.	Monroe, A. D.(1998)。Public opinion and public policy, 1980-1993。Public Opinion Quarterly，62(1)，6-28。

會議論文
1.	Monroe, A. D.(2001)。Public Opinion and Public Policy, 1960-1999。2001 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association，San Francisco，(會議日期: 2001/08/30-09/02)。San Francisco。

圖書
1.	Bryce, J.(1895)。The American Commonwealth。New York：Macmillan。
2.	Davis, R.(1996)。The Press and American Politics。NJ：Prentice Hall。
3.	Duffy, M.、Goodgame, D.(1992)。Marching in Place: The Status Quo Presidency of George Bush。New York, NY：Simon and Schuster。
4.	Erikson, R. S.、Luttbeg, R. R.(1973)。American Public Opinion。New York：American Public Opinion, Wiley。
5.	Gallup, G.、Rae, S.(1940)。Pulse of Democracy。New York：Simon and Shuster。
6.	Key, V. O. Jr.(1961)。Public Opinion and Democracy。New York：Knopif。
7.	Key, V. O. Jr.(1967)。Public Opinion and Democracy。New York：Knopif。
8.	Lippmann, Walter(1925)。The Phantom Public。New York：Harcourt Brace。
9.	Marshall, T. R.(1989)。Public Opinion and the Supreme。Court Boston：Unwin Hyman。
10.	McConnell, G.(1966)。Private Power and American Democracy。New York：Knopf。
11.	Webissberg, R.(1976)。Public Opinion and Popular Government。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall。
12.	Reeves, Richard(1993)。President Kennedy: Profile of Power。New York, NY：Touchstone。
13.	Woodward, B.(1995)。The Agenda: Inside the White House。New York：Pocket Books。
14.	Hardin, Russell(1982)。Collective Action。Johns Hopkins University Press。
15.	Devine, D. J.(1970)。The Attentive Public: Polyarchical Democracy。Chicago：Rand McNally。
16.	Olson, Mancur(1965)。The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups。New York：Mcgraw-Hill College。
17.	Dye, Thomas R.(1998)。Understanding Public Policy。Prentice-Hall。
18.	Ranney, Austin(1996)。Governing: An Introduction to Political Science。Upper Saddle River, NJ：Prentice-Hall。
19.	Schumpeter, Joseph Alois(1942)。Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy。New York：Harper and Brothers。
20.	Barber, Benjamin R.(1984)。Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age。University of California Press。
21.	Schattschneider, Elmer E.(1960)。The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America。NYC：Holt, Rinehart and Winston。
22.	Dryzek, John S.(1990)。Discursive democracy: politics, policy, and political science。Cambridge University Press。
23.	Lippmann, Walter(1922)。Public Opinion。New York：Macmillan。

圖書論文
1.	Manza, J.、Cook, F. L.(2001)。Polls, Public Opinion, and American Democracy: The State of the Debate。Polls, Policy, and the Future of American Democracy。New York：Oxford University Press。
2.	Mueller, J.(1993)。American Public Opinion and the Gulf War。The Political Psychology of the Gulf War: Leaders, Publics, and the Process。
3.	Page, B. I.、Shapiro, R. Y.(1992)。The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans。Policy Preferences。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。
4.	Yu, C.(2002)。Min I Yu Kung Kung Cheng Ts'e: Li Lun Tan T'ao Yu Shih Cheng Yen Chiu。Public Opinion and Public Policy: A Theoretical Deliberation and An Empirical Research。Taipei：Wu-Nan。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	The Adjustment of Taiwan's Administrative Systems

無相關博士論文

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	從公共政策的永續觀談起
2.	公共政策中的專家政治與民主參與：以高雄「跨港纜車」公民共識會議為例
3.	飄浪人生：遊民、家與公共政策
4.	台灣民主轉型過程中民意與公共政策之研究︰1996~2012的實證分析
5.	全球治理對國家公共政策影響之指標建構：京都議定書對台灣公共政策影響之個案分析

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫