:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:研創以審美關懷為概念的大學通識藝術課程之行動研究
書刊名:花蓮教育大學學報
作者:羅美蘭 引用關係
作者(外文):Lo, Mei-lan
出版日期:2006
卷期:23
頁次:頁49-79
主題關鍵詞:行動研究審美關懷藝術教育Action researchAesthetic caringArt education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:35
研究者以師資培育機構教學者兼研究者的角色,運用「行動研究」法,將親身的教學與研究結合,自2002年9月至2004年6月於國立花蓮師範學院進行大一通識課程〈視覺藝術賞析〉和大二通識課程〈藝術的表現與觀念〉的教學行動研究。研究目的在於研發藝術領域的通識課程,研究焦點擺在探索藝術課程的規劃與實施,包括課程設計理念、教學內容和學習策略。研究者在教學實務中發展「審美關懷」藝教理念,並據此研發視覺文化教材、運用創意多元的學習策略,例如每週課程學習單、個人學習藝誌、小組研討藝術專題、和全班共同筆記(光碟版),來激發學生的藝感、思維與創意,促成學生的自主學習和合作學習。最後,研究者根據教學省思和研究發現,提出課程革新方案和建置教學網頁,並撰寫論文、分享教學行動經驗。
The teacher as the researcher conducted action research for two years at the first general education class of 〈Appreciation of Visual Art〉and sophomore general education class of 〈 Art Performance and Conception 〉 in National Hualien Teachers College from September 2002 to July 2004. The purpose of this study was to develop two art curriculum programmes in general education. This paper was focused on exploring ‘why to teach, what to teach and how to learn’ in visual arts, including concepts for curriculum design, content for teaching and methods for learning. The researcher developed the concept of ‘aesthetic caring’ from the classroom practice, and employed multiple creative strategies of art learning, such as theme-based study, worksheets for each week, personal art diary, group study in art topics, and whole class notes (CD version), in order to inspire students’ artistic sensibility, creativity and critical thinking, further to foster and to achieve students’ autonomous learning and cooperative learning skills. Finally, based on research findings and teaching reflection, the researcher established a website and recommended two curriculum programmes for teaching-learning visual arts in general education.
期刊論文
1.Duncum, P.(2002)。Clarifying visual culture Art education。Art Education,55(3),6-11。  new window
2.Siegesmund, R.(1998)。Why do we teach art today?。Studies in Art Education,39(3),197-214。  new window
3.Somekh. B.(1995)。The Contribution of action research to development in social behaviours: A position paper on action research methodology。British Educational Research Journal,21(3),339-356。  new window
學位論文
1.羅美蘭(2003)。Comparative Analysis of Art Teacher Education in Taiwan and England with Particular Reference to the Aesthetic Domain,London, England。  new window
圖書
1.Anderson, T.、Milbrabdt, M. K.(2005)。Art for Life: Authentic Instruction in Art。Boston, MA:McGraw-Hill。  new window
2.Freedman, K.(2003)。Teaching visual culture: Curriculum, aesthetics and the social life of art。New York, NY:Teachers College Press。  new window
3.Elliott, John(1992)。Action research for educational change。Milton Keynes:Open University Press。  new window
4.陳伯璋(1998)。教育研究方法的新取向:質的研究方法。南宏。  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡清田(2000)。教育行動研究。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.李秀華(2003)。通識教育藝術領域「書法藝術與創作」教學行動研究。藝術領域的行動與省思。花蓮。  延伸查詢new window
7.羅美蘭(2003)。通識教育藝術領域「視覺藝術賞析」教學行動研究。藝術領域的行動與省思。花蓮。  延伸查詢new window
8.羅美蘭(2004)。「藝術的表現與觀念」課程方案。藝術領域的課程設計與實踐。花蓮。  延伸查詢new window
9.Pollard, Andrew(2002)。Reflect teaching: Reflective and evidence-informed professional practice。Reflect teaching: Reflective and evidence-informed professional practice。London, New York。  new window
其他
1.蕭瓊瑞(2000)。時空探奇:走過臺灣美術的長廊,臺中。  延伸查詢new window
2.羅美蘭(2002)。國立花蓮師範學院藝術領域通識課程「視覺藝術賞析」教學大綱,花蓮。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE