:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:晚清實學所表現的學術轉型之過渡
書刊名:中央研究院近代史研究所集刊
作者:王爾敏
作者(外文):Wang, Erh-min
出版日期:2006
卷期:52
頁次:頁19-51
主題關鍵詞:實學實業丕但發牌衙門實學報王仁俊Solid learningBusiness managementCommerce and agriculturePatentPatent officeJournal for the Study of ScienceWang Renjun
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:45
思想演變速,學術轉型緩,兩者各具內涵特質。惟近代學術亦承受西方學術嚴重衝擊,思想多起激盪,學術亦備受西方學術之浸澈感染。鴉片戰後五十年,特別在中日甲午戰後,立即驅使學術上創生出一種「實學」,卻不同於清初儒生之所謂「實學」。   自光緒2年至5年(1876-1879),廣州大吏、兩廣總督籌建「實學館」以教中國童子學習天文、算學、重學、電學、化學、光學。顯見這時「實學」內涵即相當於西方的science。    到甲午戰後(1895),國人深具反省,遂至而有翰林王仁俊創刊《實學報》,湖南學政江標創刊《湘學新報》,鼓吹提倡「實學」。王仁俊所倡之實學內涵,包括:天學、地學、人學、物學,江標所倡設說的實學內涵,包括:算學、商學、掌故之學、輿地之學、交涉之學。二人之共同點,則是絕不再重視經學,使此沿貫三千年的學術主體,從此被放棄不用。而轉向於完全轉換內涵的實學,正是表現這個時代走上學術轉型之第一步。
Intellectual developments may occur quickly while changes in scholarship are slower; the content of each has its own character. Because modern Chinese scholarship bore the assault of Western scholarship, traditional Chinese thought underwent numerous disturbances and Chinese scholarship also came to be thoroughly imbued with Western scholarship. The fifty years following the Opium War, and especially after the Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895, quickly led to the emergence of a kind of “solid learning” in scholarship, but one that differed from the so-called “solid learning” of early Qing scholars.   Between 1876 and 1879, high officials in Guangzhou and the Liangguang governor-general planned the establishment of an “office of solid learning” in order to teach Chinese children astronomy, mathematics, physics, electricity, chemistry, and optics. It is thus clear that at this time the scope of “solid learning” was virtually equivalent to that of Western “science.”   By the time of the Sino-Japanese War (1895), Chinese had deeply reflected on the situation. The Hanlin scholar Wang Renjun thus founded the Journal for the Study of Science, and the Hunan school director Jiang Biao founded the New Journal of Hunan Learning to promote “solid learning” or science. The “solid learning” promoted by Wang Renjun included astronomy, geography/geology, humanities, and biology/physics. The “solid learning” promoted by Jiang Biao included mathematics, business, historical stories, geography, and communication. What the two men shared was a complete disdain for classical learning, and so the previous three-thousand-years-old scholarly mainstream was henceforth abandoned. The turn toward a “solid learning” whose content was completely transformed marked the first step of a transition in scholarship at this time.
期刊論文
1.王爾敏(19850000)。張謇之實業經濟思想。香港中文大學中國文化研究所學報,16,5-30。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊聯陞(1970)。與王爾敏論學書。中華文化復興月刊,3(3),55。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.鄭觀應(1968)。盛世危言後編。盛世危言後編。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭觀應、吳相湘(1965)。盛世危言增訂新編。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.易惠莉(1998)。鄭觀應評傳。南京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.(1987)。時務報。臺北:文海出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.鄭觀應、夏東元(1982)。鄭觀應集。上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.王爾敏(1963)。清季兵工業的興起。臺北:中央研究院近代史研究所。  延伸查詢new window
7.王爾敏(1977)。中國近代思想史論。華世出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.(1967)。湘學新報。湘學新報。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.王爾敏(1981)。中華民國開國初期之實業建國思想。中華民國建國史討論集(第2冊)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.朱有瓛(1988)。中國近代學制史料(第1輯,上冊:第2輯,上、下冊)。中國近代學制史料(第1輯,上冊:第2輯,上、下冊)。上海。  延伸查詢new window
11.張謇(1991)。張季子九錄。張季子九錄。上海。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(1996)。知新報(第14冊),上海。  延伸查詢new window
2.(1996)。實學報(第1冊),臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top