:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:對質詰問權與傳聞法則--比較法之探索
書刊名:法令月刊
作者:林輝煌 引用關係
出版日期:2007
卷期:58:5
頁次:頁21-37
主題關鍵詞:反詰問共同被告分離審判582號解釋
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(12) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:12
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:22
期刊論文
1.Amar, A. R.(1998)。Confrontation Clause First Principles: A Reply to Professor Friedman。Georgetown Law Journal,86,1045-1050。  new window
2.Summers, S. J.(2004)。The Right to Confrontation after Crawford v. Washington: A 'Continental European' Perspective。International Commentary on Evidence,2(1)。  new window
3.Reiter, H.(1994)。Hearsay Evidence and Criminal Process in Germany and Australia。Monash University Law Review,10,51-71。  new window
4.Osborne, Craig(1993)。Hearsay and the European Court of Human Rights。Criminal Law Review,255-267。  new window
5.Choo, Andrew(2004)。Crawford v Washington: A View from Across the Atlantic。International Commentary on Evidence,2(1)。  new window
圖書
1.LaFave, Wayne R.、Israel, Jerold H.、King, Nancy J.(2004)。Criminal Procedure。Thompson West Publishing。  new window
圖書論文
1.(1997)。Law Commission (Law Com No 245)。Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Hearsay and Related Topics。  new window
2.Birch, D. J.(1987)。Hearsay-Logic and Hearsay-Fiddles: Blastland Revisited。Criminal Law: Essays in Honour of J.C. Smith。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top