:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:東亞經貿分工及區域整合之研析
書刊名:經濟研究
作者:陳美菊
作者(外文):Chen, Meichu
出版日期:2007
卷期:7
頁次:頁235-262
主題關鍵詞:東亞經貿分工經貿整合區域經濟整合自由貿易協定FTA
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:34
中國加入東亞經貿分工體系後,區內經濟及貿易快速成長,對區內及區外經貿整合亦加速進行。本研究發現,東亞經濟整合主要是透過企 業對外投資,建立全球緊密的經貿分工體系為主。近年來在中國及日本爭取東亞經濟整合主導權下,興起制度性安排的區域整合。東亞此波政 治趨動的經濟整合,FTA涵蓋的內容雖包羅萬象,惟涉及實質自由化內容相當有限,貿易創造效果不大,但錯綜複雜的原產地規定恐徒增海關 作業成本,不利東亞地區貿易的發展;另,各國致力於推動雙邊FTA,亦有礙WTO多邊貿易自由化之進行。為使東亞經貿整合對我國的衝擊降 至最低,我國除了應克服外交的困境參與區域整合外,亦應深入研究分析東亞整合後,產業價值鏈變化及商機,以協助廠商進行全球佈局。
Since china joined the East Asian division-of-labor system, East Asian intra-regional trade and economic activities have developed rapidly, while intra-and extra-regional economic integration have also progressed at a faster pace. This study finds that East Asian economic integration is mainly driven by foreign direct investment (FDI), though which a close and comprehensive global production network has been built. In recent years, institutional arrangements for integration have been introduced as China and Japan have been actively vying for leadership in East Asian economic integration. Free trade agreements (FTAs) initiated under this recent movement of politically driven integration are comprehensive but deficient in trade creation due to very limited coverage for substantive liberalization. At the same time, complicated rules of origin are unfavorable to East customs and resultant costs. The promotion of bilateral FTAs may also hinder the WTO's progress in multilateral liberalization. The challenge for Taiwan in the face of East Asian economic integration is to take part in it against unfavorable diplomatic odds, while at the same time carefully analyzing value-chain changes and new business opportunities arising from integration, with a view to helping Taiwanese businesses in their pursuit of global positioning.
期刊論文
1.史惠慈(20060700)。日本電子業在中國、東南亞、印度的投資佈局與國際價值鏈分工模式。經濟前瞻,106,87-91。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳瑟致(20051200)。中國對區域主義的影響之初探。亞太經濟合作評論,13,107-120。  延伸查詢new window
3.Wolf, Martin(20060703)。WTO談判再拖就得再等三年。商業週刊,971。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.田島哲也(2006)。探討整合東亞區域的基本問題。台日景氣暨產業發展研討會,(會議日期: 2006年8月17日)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.洪財隆(2006)。東亞經濟整合與台灣因應策略。台日景氣暨產業發展研討會,(會議日期: 2006年8月17日)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
3.Cadot, O.、de Melo, J.、Portugal-Perez, A.。ROO for PTAs: Implications for AFTA of US and EU Regimes。WB-BFA Workshop,(會議日期: June 26-27)。Hainan。  new window
4.Urata, Shujiro(2006)。A Shit from Market-driven to Institution-driven Regionalization in East Asia。The Conference on Economic Policy Reform in Asia,(會議日期: May 31-June 3, 2006)。Stanford University。  new window
5.Cheong, Inkyo、Kwon, Kyong Deok(2005)。Assessing the Quality of FTAs and Implications for East Asian Economic Integration。The 16th General Meeting Seoul 2005。  new window
6.Kimura, Fukunari(2005)。The Globalization of Production Networks: A View from Asia。The OECD Workshop on The Globalization of Production: Impacts on Employment, Productivity, and Economic Growth,(會議日期: November 15-16, 2005)。  new window
7.Lawrence, Robert Z.(2006)。China and the Multilateral Trading System。A conference on China and Emerging Asia: Reorganizing the Global Economy?,The Korea Institute for Economic Policy and Center for International Commerce and Finance at Graduat (會議日期: May 11-12, 2006)。Seoul:Seoul National University。  new window
研究報告
1.Zhai, Fan(2006)。Preferential Trade Agreements in Asia: Alternative Scenarios of 'Hub and Spoke'。  new window
圖書
1.World Bank(2005)。Global Economic Prospects, 2005: Trade, Regionalism, and Development。Washington:World Bank。  new window
2.Japan External Trade Organization(2003)。Current status of AFTA and Corporate Responses。Tokyo:Japan External Trade Organization。  new window
3.Baldwin, Richard E.(2003)。The Spoke Trap : hub and spoke bilateralism in East Asia。Graduate Institute of International Studies。  new window
其他
1.(20050729)。The future of globalization。  new window
2.(20050729)。In the twilight of Doha。  new window
3.Pasadilla, Gloria O.(2006)。Preferential Trading Agreements and Agricultural Liberalization in East and Southeast Asia,Philippine Institute for Development Studies。  new window
4.Japan Ministry of Economy, Trade and Inudstry(2006)。White Paper on International Economy and Trade 2006 Toward Sustained Potential for Growth-enhanced Productivity Through Globalization and Japan as an Investment Powerhouse。  new window
5.Baldwin, Richard E.(2006)。Multilateralising Regionalism-Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade,http://www.cepr.org。  new window
6.Baldwin, Richard E.(2006)。Managing the noodle bowl : the fragility of east Asian regionalism,http://www.cepr.org。  new window
7.Cheong, Inkyo,Kwon, Kyong Deok(2006)。Assessing the Quality of FTAs and Implications for East Asia,http://www.fta.pe.kr。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE