目的：旨在評估2002年第十四屆釜山亞運會44個國家參賽績效，並探究傳統總獎牌數代表國家運動表現的思維。方法：採用資料包絡分析法，設定國家經濟力量（國內生產毛額）與人口力量（人口數）兩項投入指標，探究總合加總Zero sum gains DEA (ZSG-DEA) 模式整合產出指標的適用性。結果：一、中華臺北總得牌數排名第8，表現尚可；唯總合加總 (ZSG-DEA) 模式0.344（排名第17），顯示參賽效率相對不足。二、中華臺北標竿學習對象包括韓國、哈薩克與卡達。三、中華臺北為規模報酬遞減，應致力於減少投入或增加產出，方能創造較佳效益。四、中華臺北屬於技術無效率且生產力不佳之群組，參賽效率不佳、有待改進。結論：顯示亞運會為奧運會前哨戰，政府應致力於提升體育投入資源、亞運會參賽策略乃至於國家整體競技運動水準等環節，協助運動員追求卓越運動表現、為國爭光。

Purposes: To evaluate 44 participating nations' performance in the 14th Asian Games Busan in 2002, as well as to explore the issue numbers of medal they have won traditionally represent the nations' sport power. Methods: We used two indexes, economic power (gross domestic product) and demographic power (population) as inputs and analyzed by Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to realize the applicability of the integrated outputs Zero sum gains DEA (ZSG-DEA). Results: 1. The ranks of Chinese Taipei was the 8th counted by the number of medals won, but the score of ZSG-DEA model was 0.344 (rank 17th) respectively. The above results showed the relative deficiency of their performance. 2. The benchmarking of Chinese Taipei included Korea, Kazakhstan, and Qatar. 3. Chinese Taipei, which belonged to decreasing returns to scale (DRS), should abate participative scale or increase output of medals for establishing better efficiency. 4. Chinese Taipei was in the group of technical inefficiency and poor productivity, it represented the Chinese Taipei ought to get more progress. Conclusions: The Asian game is the anticipated battle of the Olympic game, we suggested the Chinese Taipei government should enhance and increase resource investment for sports, Asian game participated strategies, even the nation's entire sport competitive power in order to pursue athletes' extraordinary performance and honor of our nation.