:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:圖書館服務與電子化業務之績效評估
作者:吳牧臻
作者(外文):Mu-Chen Wu
校院名稱:中華大學
系所名稱:科技管理博士學位學程
指導教授:謝玲芬
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2011
主題關鍵詞:圖書館服務電子化業務績效評估資料包絡分析法保證區域Library servicee-Library affairsperformance evaluationData envelopment analysisAssurance region
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:29
技職校院(含科技大學46所、技術學院31所及專科學校15所)已高達92所,其學校數目遠遠超過高教體系之71所。學校數目之增加不斷提高政府之財政負擔,也逐漸降低分配至各層級學校之補助經費。特別是台灣少子女化現象日益嚴重,許多技職校院學校都面臨無法招收足額學生數之窘境,造成學費收入下降,以致於學校在經營管理上更顯捉襟見肘。尤其,圖書館在技職校院中並不是一個能夠為校方謀利的單位,但卻是校內蒐藏教學與研究等相關資料之重鎮,亦是學生閱讀與檢索各類型資源之場所,更是教育部評鑑技職校院時必然審核與評比之單位。因此對於校方分配給圖書館的經費就相當地彌足珍貴,圖書館必須在有限經費下,購置符合全校師生需求之各式館藏與設備。
本論文首先建立圖書館服務績效之評估模式,特別以目前整體圖書館實務經營之環境現況下,考量並評估各圖書館在現有已知數量之各類型館藏基礎下,所投注的成本與人力是否處於最適切且最適量的配置上,其次依據既有的館藏使用量,反思各種不同資料類型館藏之購置數量是否切合時宜且更深入檢視所投入經費之理想調整幅度,務使有限成本發揮最大的效率與效能。其次,對於服務產出構面之四項細目指標,結合保證區域之權重限制概念,希望藉由設限這四種資料類型之權重後,再次評估各圖書館成本效率與服務效能之相對績效。另外,由於現今各種電子資源購置費用相當昂貴,將針對各圖書館電子化業務建構績效之評估模式,當各圖書館在購置成本不易調降下,分析其提供之電子化業務相關之館藏與服務是否配置得宜,且這些是否皆為讀者所需之內容及服務,以檢視各圖書館在電子化業務之績效表現。
雖然各圖書館身處於資源有限的大環境,依然能透過本文之績效評估結果來建立自我特色,並作為館方管理階層調整決策與改善經營方向之參考,以持續強化競爭之優勢!
Vocational schools in Taiwan have reached the total of 100 which is far more than the 63 of higher education system. The increased number of schools continues to enhance the government financial burden and also gradually reduce the grant funds allocated to all level of schools. Particularly the phenomenon of fewer babies born in Taiwan, many vocational schools are facing the dilemma that can not recruit the number of students, resulting in reduction in tuition income and leading to the more difficult operation and management. Especially, libraries are not profit units in vocational schools but the significant site for collecting relevant information toward teaching and researches as well as the place for students to read and search all types of resources and the inevitable unit for technological and vocational school evaluation review by Ministry of Education.
This study first established the evaluation model of library service performance and indicators of service outputs item with the modified model of assurance region. In addition, the evaluation model of e-library affairs cost efficiency and service effectiveness is established and viewed its performance of e-library affairs.
Therefore, although the university libraries are under the resource-limited environment, the characteristics of its can be established by the performance assessment in this study to ensure the library competitive advantage and allow the sustainable operation of the school!
于泳泓(2002)。平衡計分卡最佳實務。台北市:商周文化。

王怡心(2004)。大學圖書館應用BSC之案例--國立臺北大學:平衡計分卡擴大運用非營利事業組織也可行。會計研究月刊,224,150-155。

王珮玲(2001)。公共圖書館績效評估之研究—以台北市立圖書館為例。國家圖書館館刊運用,2,35-65。new window

王麗焦(2006)。大學圖書館評鑑之探討。國家圖書館館刊,95(1),35-38。

吳明憲(2006)。平衡計分卡在大學圖書館之應用—以屏教大圖書館為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所,屏東市。

林心怡(2005)。使用DEA衡量圖書館服務品質與經營效率—以高雄市立圖書館為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立高雄應用科技大學人力資源發展研究所,高雄市。

林岳民(2009)。大學圖書館之營運績效分析與標竿學習之探討。未出版之碩士論文,私立中華大學科技管理研究所,新竹市。

林雅智(2002)。大學圖書館評比模式之建構與實證研究。未出版之博士論文,國立成功大學工業管理研究所,台南市。

洪世昌(2001)。標竿分析與ISO 11620於圖書館績效評估之應用。國立台灣師範大學圖書館通訊,48,2-6。

教育部統計資料(2011)。教育部統計處。檢索日期100年6月28日,取自http://140.111.34.54/statistics/index.aspx

高強(1997)。大學圖書館績效評估模式之建構與應用。台北市:行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃。

高強(1998)。由非營利單位之效率評估—談圖書館績效評量。國立成功大學圖書館館刊,1,2-9。new window

高強,黃旭男,Toshiyuki sueyoshi(2003)。管理績效評估:資料包絡分析法。台北市:華泰書局。

孫遜(2004)。資料包絡分析法—理論與應用。台北市:揚智文化。

許士軍(2009)。策略核心組織:以平衡計分卡有效執行企業策略。台北:臉譜。

張保隆、陳澤義(1995)。臺灣各縣市文化中心相對績效之評估。中國行政,57,31-45。

盧秀菊(2003)。圖書館之績效評估。中國圖書館學會會報,71,1-19。new window

應立志、黃長永(2006)。公共圖書館績效評估之探討:以雲林縣鄉鎮圖書館為例。臺灣圖書館管理季刊,2(4),77-98。

謝玲芬、陳佩雯(2004)。運用效率與效能評估圖書館服務績效。2004產業管理創新研討會論文集,台中:修平技術學院。

謝寶煖(1998)。從顧客觀點來談圖書館的績效評估。國立成功大學圖書館館刊,1,10。new window

簡明忠(2005)。延長國民發展教育趨勢之探討。技術及職業教育,27,20-25。

羅思嘉、梁伶君(1998)。大學圖書館績效評估模式之研究。國立成功大學圖書館館刊,1,23-35。new window

蘇偉鴻(2010)。應用二階段資料包絡分析法在辦學績效之評估-以台灣南部五縣市技職校院為例。未出版之碩士論文,私立南台科技大學企業管理研究所,台南市。

顧志遠(1987)。有關非營利機關效率評估及預算再分配之整體規劃模式研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立清華大學工業工程研究所,新竹市。

Abbott, C. (1994). Performance Measurement in Library and Information Services. London: Aslib.

Baker, S. L. & Lancaster, F. W. (1991). The Measurement and Evaluation of Library Services. VA: Information Resources Press.

Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Efficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 33, 1078-1092.



Brophy, P., Clarke, Z., Brinkley, M. & Mundt, S. (2002). EQUINOX: Library Performance Measurement and Quality Management System, Performance Indicators for Electronic Library Services.

Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, & E. Rhodes (1978). Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 2429-444.

Chen, T. Y. (1997). A Measurement of the Resource Utilization Efficiency of University Libraries. International Journal of Production Economics, 63, 71-80.

Chatzigeorgiou, A., Stiakakis, E. (2010). Benchmarking Library and Application Software with Data Envelopment Analysis. Software Quality Journal, published online: 19 September.

Crowford, J. (1996). Evaluation of Library and Information Services. London: Aslib.

Dougherty, R. M. (1991). Research Libraries Must Abandon the Idea that ‘Bigger is Better’. Chronicle of Higher Education, June, A32.

Easun, M. S. (1992). Identifying Efficiencies in Resource Management: an Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Selected School Libraries in California. PH.D. Thesis, CA: University of California, Berkerly.

Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal Research Statistics Society. 120(3): 253-281.

Gerhard, R. & Margit, S. R. (2006). University Library Benchmarking: an International comparison using DEA. International Journal of Production Economics, 100, 131-147.

Golany, B. (1988). A Note On Including Ordinal Relation A Mong Multipliers in DEA. Management Science, 34(8), 1029-1033.

Golany, B. & Roll, Y. (1989). An Application Procedure for DEA. OMEGA, 17(3), 237-250.

Hammond, C. J. (2002). Efficiency in the Provision of Public Service: A Data Envelopment Analysis of UK Public Library Systems. Applied Economic, 34(5), 649-657.

Hernon, P. & Altman, E. (1996). Service Quality in Academic Libraries. NJ: Ablex.

Hsieh, L. F., Chin, J. B. & Wu, M. C. (2004). The Performance Indicators of University E-library in Taiwan. The Electronic Library, 22(4), 325-330.

Hsieh, L. F., Chin, J. B. & Wu, M. C. (2006). Performance Evaluation for University Electronic library in Taiwan. The Electronic Library, 24(2), 212-224.

ISO 11620 (1998). Information and Documentation-Library Performance Indicators. International Organization for Standardization.

ISO 2789 (1998). Information and Documentation-International Library Statistic. International Organization for Standardization.

Kaplan, R. & Norton, D. (1992). Harvard Business Review: Measuring Corporate Performance. Taipei: Journal of Common Wealth.

Lancaster, F. W. (1977). The Measurement and Evaluation of Library Services. Washington, D.C.: Information Resources Press.

Liu, H. Y. & Shu, J. H. (2008). A Study of Demands Analysis and Marketing Strategy of Electronic Resources in University Library. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 45(3), 331-356.

Liu, S. T. & Chuang, M. (2009). Fuzzy Efficiency Measures in Fuzzy DEA/AR with Application to University Libraries. Expert Systems with Application, 36, 1105-1113.

Nevena, S. & Vyara, A. (2004). Measuring the Efficiency of University Libraries Using Data Envelopment Analysis. University of Economics-Varna, Bulgaria.

Poll, R. (2001). Performance, Processes and Costs: Managing Service Quality with the Balanced Scorecard. Library Trends, 49(4), 709-717.

Shaughnessy, T. W. (1990). Assessing Library Effectiveness. Journal of Library Administration. 12(1), 1-8.

Shim, W. (2003). Applying DEA Technique to Library Evaluation in Academic Research Libraries. Library Trends, 51(3), 312-332.

Tseng, F. C. & Li, T. H. (2008). A Study of Assessment of Library E-resource Metasearch System. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 6(1/2), 111-142.

Xie, H. (2006). Evaluation of Digital Libraries: Criteria and Problems from User’s Perspectives. Library and Information Science Research, 28(3), 433-452.

Yu, S. C. (2007). RFID implementation and benefits in libraries. Electronic Library, 25(1), 54-64.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE