馬來西亞國家人權委員會之研究__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	馬來西亞國家人權委員會之研究
書刊名：	臺北大學法學論叢
作者：	廖福特
作者(外文)：	Liao, Fort Fu-te
出版日期：	2008
卷期：	66
頁次：	頁77-137
主題關鍵詞：	馬來西亞國家人權委員會；國家人權機構；巴黎原則；憲政體制；國際人權；SUHAKAM；Human rights commission of Malaysia；National human rights institution；Paris principles；Constitutional system；International human rights
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:2 共同引用:3 點閱:36

　　本文以聯合國針對國家人權機構所建構之理想及準則為基礎，分析馬來西亞國家人權委員會，並且著重於法律規範、組織及職權等三個面向。　　本文認為，馬來西亞設立國家人權委員會之源起，國際壓力占了相當大之因素。而因為大英國協及亞太區域發展趨勢，影響馬來西亞設立了獨立人權委員會模式之國家人權機構，並制定新法律以規範其組織及職權。　　從組機架構觀之，「馬來西亞人權委員會法」已建構了基本規範，但是其問題包括行政權掌握任命及解職委員之完全權力、委員任期太短、專任委員不足等。在經費部分，馬來西亞政府所提供之經費是否完全充分尚有疑問，或可將其預算編列直接由國會決定之。馬來西亞國家人權委員會已有相當不錯之辦公空間、地區辦公室及內部組織，也能聘任相當數量之職員，但是遺憾的是其並無權力訂定對職員之懲戒規則。　　有關職權部分，「馬來西亞人權委員會法」確認了國家人權委員會之職權方向，也包括了聯合國所期待的橋樑、促進者及保護者三大功能。國家人權委員會已扮演好橋樑及促進者之角色，其已建議政府應積極加入國際人權條約，並針對各種人權議題提出意見，因此民間團體己漸能肯定國家人權委員會之獨立性及專業性。但是國家人權委員會並沒有扮演好保護者之角色，其沒有提出對於個案之完備建議及追蹤政府改善，對於訪視各拘禁處所亦未提出完整內容及具體建議。　　本文認為馬來西亞國家人權委員會職權無法完全發揮的重要原因是政府未善意回應各種意見及建議，其根本法律理由是「馬來西亞人權委員會法」並沒有規定國家人權委員會各種意見及建議之效力。

以文找文

　　This paper examines Malaysian National Human Rights Commission by the ideas and principles established by the United Nations, and focuses on three issues: legal basis, structure and functions. 　　It considers that, because of international pressure, Malaysia established the Commission. Influenced by developments of British Commonwealth and Asia Pacific region an independent Commission was established and a new law was enacted to rule its structure and functions. 　　Regarding its structure, the Commission has established basic rules. However, its problems include administrative branch holding power to appoint all commissioners, commissioners having short term and fewer full-time members. There is a doubt whether the Malaysian government provided adequate budget, and it is suggested that the Commission's budget can be allocated directly by the Parliament. The Commission has three-floor office, regional branches and interior departments, which have many staffs. It is however regret that the Commission has no power to draw up discipline rules. 　　Concerning its functions, the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia Act endorses its direction, which includes three main roles: bridge, promoter and protector that the UN expects. The Commission has played a good role as bridge and promoter, as it has recommended that government should positively access to several international human rights treaties, and also has provided numerous opinions on human rights issues. The result of such efforts was that NGOs have affirmed the Commission's independence and specialty. However, the Commission may not be a good protector. It did not offer fully opinions and suggestions on individual petitions and places that it visited. 　　This paper argues that a main reason that the Commission can not be a protector was due to the govemment's negative response of which the legal reason is that the Act did not rule the effect of the Commission's opinions and recommendations.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Gilson, Ronald J.(2001)。Globalizing Corporate Governance: Convergence of Form or Function。The American Journal of Comparative Law，49(2)，329-357。
2.	Evans, Carolyn(2004)。Human Rights Commissions and Religious Conflict in the Asia-Pacific Region。International and Comparative Law Quarterly，53，713-729。
3.	Sale, Hillary A.(2004)。Delaware's Good Faith。Cornell Law Review，89(2)，456-495。
4.	蔡源林(20030500)。馬來西亞伊斯蘭律法的變遷--一個殖民現代化的例子。世界宗教學刊，1，43-77。延伸查詢
5.	Kumar, C. Raj(2003)。National Human Rights Institutions: Good Governance Perspectives on Institutionalization of Human Rights。American University International Law Review，19(2)，259-300。
6.	Cooter, Robert、Freedman, Bradley J.(1991)。The Fiduciary Relationship: Its Economic Character and Legal Consequences。New York University Law Review，66，1045-1075。
7.	Eisenberg, Melvin A.(2006)。The Duty of Good Faith in Corporate Law。Delaware Journal of Corporate Law，31，1。
8.	Macey, Jonathan(2006)。The Nature of Conflicts of Interests within the Firm。Journal of Corporation Law，31。
9.	Block, Dennis J.、Maimone, Michael J.、Ross, Steven B.(1993)。The Duty of Loyalty and the Evolution of the Scope of Judicial Review。Brooklyn Law Review，59。
10.	Ryan, Patrick J.(1991)。Strange Bedfellows: Corporate Fiduciaries and the General Law Compliance Obligation in Section 2.01(a) of the American Law Institute's Principles of Corporate Governance。Washington Law Review，66。
11.	Williams, Cynthia A.(1998)。Corporate Compliance with the Law in the Era of Efficiency。North Carolina Law Review，76。
12.	Easterbrook, Frank H.、Fischel, Daniel R.(1982)。Antitrust Suits by Targets of Tender Offers。Michigan Law Review，80。
13.	Greenfield, Kent(2001)。Ultra Vires Lives! A Stakeholder Analysis of Corporate Illegality (with Notes on How Corporate Law could Enforce International Law Norms)。Virginia Law Review，87。
14.	Bundy, Stephen McG.、Elhauge, Einer、Bundy, Stephen Mcg(1993)。Knowledge about Legal Sanctions。Michigan Law Review，92。
15.	Rock, Edward、Wachter, Michael(2002)。Dangerous Liaisons: Corporate Law, Trust Law and Interdoctrinal Legal Transplants。Northwestern University Law Review，96(2)。
16.	Rosenberg, David(2004)。Making Sense of Good Faith in Delaware Orporate Fiduciary Law: A Contractarian Approach。Delaware Journal of Corporate Law，29。
17.	Whiting, Amanda(2003)。Situating Suhakam: Human Rights Debates and Malaysia's National Human Rights Commission。Stanford Journal of International Law，39。

會議論文
1.	Choo, Dato' Siew Kioh(2005)。The Background, Structure, Functions and Perspective of the NHRC of Malaysia。0。
2.	Faruqi, Shad Saleem(2000)。A Constitutional Perspective。0。
3.	Fernandez, Irene(2000)。Gender and NGO Perspective。0。
4.	Tan Sri Anuar Zainal Abidin(2000)。HRC of Malaysia: Challenges Ahead for Human Rights in Malaysia。0。
5.	Wong, Elizabeth(2000)。The NGO Perspective。0。
6.	Nadason, Marimutbu(2000)。Welcome Address。0。
7.	Tikamdas, Ramdas(2002)。Evaluation of Suhakam。0。
8.	Howen, Nicholas(2002)。Legitimacy & Effectiveness: Putting the Paris Principles。0。
9.	Chiam, Keng Heng(2002)。The Role and Challenges of Suhakam in Promoting and Protecting Human Rights。0。
10.	Santiago, Charles(2003)。Economic, Social and Cultural Rights。0。
11.	Ramakrishnan, P.(2003)。Suhakam: What Assessment, Whose Future?。0。
12.	Tan Sri Harun Hashim(2003)。Suhakam's Achievements in Monitoring Democracy and the Rule of Law。0。
13.	Chiam, Keng Heng(2003)。Suhakam's Recommendations and the Government's Response。0。
14.	Tikamdas, Ramdas(2004)。Government's Response to Suhakam Reports and Recommendations to Protect and Promote Human Rights。0。
15.	Datuk Param Cumaraswamy(2004)。Opening Address: Need for Full-time Commissioners。0。
16.	Chiam, Keng Heng(2004)。Overview of Suhakam's Annual Report 2003。0。
17.	Abdullah, Maria Chin(2004)。Rights of Women and Children。0。
18.	Tan Sri Harun Hashim(2001)。Assessment of Human Rights in Malaysia and the Role of Suhakam in Promoting and Protecting Human Rights。0。
19.	Fernandez, Irene(2001)。Criticism and Evaluation of Suhakam。0。
20.	Hashim, Mohd Nasir(2001)。General Overview on Suhakam。0。
21.	(2001)。Memorandum from Civil Society to the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) and Government of Malaysia。0。
22.	Gan, Steve(2001)。Press Freedom: Three Things Suhakam Can Do。0。
23.	Nicholas, Colin(2001)。Suhakam and Indigenous People。0。
24.	Tikamdas, Ramdas(2001)。Suhakam: Analysis of Maiden Parliamentary Report。0。
25.	Suhakam(2004)。Malaysian Human Rights Day 2002。0。

圖書
1.	Shavell, Steven(2004)。Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law。Cambridge, MA：Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。
2.	Easterbrook, Frank H.、Fischel, Daniel R.(1992)。The Economic Structure of Corporate Law。The Economic Structure of Corporate Law。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。
3.	Robison, Mary(2006)。A Voice for Human Rights。Philadelphia：University of Pennsylvania Press。
4.	European Central Bank、Suhakam(2003)。Annual Report 2002。Frankfurt, Germany：ECB。
5.	(Leisure、Cultural Services Department)(2006)。Annual Report 2005。Hong Kong：Leisure & Cultural Services Department。
6.	大英國協秘書處(2001)。國家人權機構最佳作法。國家人權機構最佳作法。雪梨：大英國協秘書處。延伸查詢
7.	林若雩(2001)。馬哈迪主政下的馬來西亞：國家與社會關係（1981-2001）。台北：韋伯文化。延伸查詢
8.	De Bary, William Theodore、陳立勝(2003)。亞洲價值與人權：從儒學社群主義立論。正中書局。延伸查詢
9.	Harding, Andrew(1996)。Law, Government and the Constitution in Malaysia。Kuala Lumpur：Malayan Law Journal Sdn. Bhd. Publisher。
10.	Pohjolainen, Anna-Elina(2006)。The Evolution of National Human Rights Institutions The Role of the United Nations。Denmark：The Danish Institute for Human Rights。
11.	林子儀、葉俊榮、黃昭元、張文貞(2003)。憲法-權力分立。臺北：新學林。延伸查詢
12.	Clark, R. C.(1986)。Corporate Law。Boston, MA：Aspen Law & Business。
13.	European Central Bank、Suhakam(2005)。Annual Report 2004。Annual Report 2004。0。
14.	蔡源林(2000)。馬來西亞伊斯蘭國教化之歷史淵源。東南亞的變貌。臺北市。延伸查詢
15.	Suhakam(2004)。Adequate Housing: A Human Right. A Report of Suhakam's Seminar on Human Rights Pertaining to Basic Needs。Adequate Housing: A Human Right. A Report of Suhakam's Seminar on Human Rights Pertaining to Basic Needs。0。
16.	Vandamme, Thomas A. J. A.、Reestman, Jan-Herman(2001)。Ambiguity in the Rule of Law the Interface between National and International Legal System。Ambiguity in the Rule of Law the Interface between National and International Legal System。0。
17.	Suhakam(2002)。Annual Report 2001。Annual Report 2001。0。
18.	Suhakam(2004)。Annual Report 2003。Annual Report 2003。0。
19.	International Council on Human Rights Policy and Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights(2005)。Assessing the Effectiveness of National Human Rights Institutions。Assessing the Effectiveness of National Human Rights Institutions。0。
20.	Bari, Abdul Aziz(2002)。Cabinet Principles in Malaysia the Law and Practice。Cabinet Principles in Malaysia the Law and Practice。0。
21.	Tan, Kevin Yl、張黎衍(1999)。Constitutional Law in Malaysia & Singapore。Constitutional Law in Malaysia & Singapore。0。
22.	Wong, Elizabeth(2002)。Critical Voices on Sustainable Development。Critical Voices on Sustainable Development。0。
23.	Eldridge, Philip(2002)。Emerging Roles of National Human Rights Institutions in Southeast Asia。Emerging Roles of National Human Rights Institutions in Southeast Asia。0。
24.	Ahmad, Zakaria Haji(1987)。Government and Politics of Malaysia。Government and Politics of Malaysia。0。
25.	Ministry of Foreign Affairs(2004)。Human Rights 2003 Annual Report on Norway's Efforts to Promote Human Rights。Human Rights 2003 Annual Report on Norway's Efforts to Promote Human Rights。0。
26.	Jacobsen, Michael、Bruun, Ole(2000)。Human Rights and Asia Values: Contesting National Identities and Cultural Representations in Asia。Richmond, Surrey：Curzon。
27.	Suhakam(2004)。Human Rights and the Administration of Law: A Report of Suhakam's Conference Held in Conjunction with the Third Malaysian Human Rights Day。Human Rights and the Administration of Law: A Report of Suhakam's Conference Held in Conjunction with the Third Malaysian Human Rights Day。0。
28.	Jan, Jameah Mohd(2003)。Malaysia in Brief 2003。Malaysia in Brief 2003。0。
29.	Said, Muhammad Ikmal、Emby, Zahid(1996)。Malaysia: Critical Perspectives Essays in Honour of Syed Husin Ali。Malaysia: Critical Perspectives Essays in Honour of Syed Husin Ali。0。
30.	Suara Rakyat Malaysia(2003)。Malaysia: Human Rights Report 2003。Malaysia: Human Rights Report 2003。0。
31.	Suara Rakyat Malaysia(2005)。Malaysia: Human Rights Report 2004。Malaysia: Human Rights Report 2004。0。
32.	Bari, Abdul Aziz(2003)。Malaysian Constitution a Critical Introduction。Kuala Lumpur：The Other Press。
33.	Suara Rakyat Malaysia(2000)。Malaysian Human Rights Report Civil and Political Rights in 2000。Malaysian Human Rights Report Civil and Political Rights in 2000。0。
34.	Suara Rakyat Malaysia(2001)。Malaysian Human Rights Report Civil and Political Rights in 2001。Malaysian Human Rights Report Civil and Political Rights in 2001。0。
35.	Hickling, R. H.(1997)。Malaysian Public Law。Malaysian Public Law。0。
36.	South Asia Human Rights Information Centre(1998)。National Human Rights Institutions in the Asia Pacific Region. Report of the Alternate Ngo Consultation on the Second Asia-Pacific Regional Workshop on National Human Rights Institutions。National Human Rights Institutions in the Asia Pacific Region. Report of the Alternate Ngo Consultation on the Second Asia-Pacific Regional Workshop on National Human Rights Institutions。0。
37.	Era Consumer Malaysia(2003)。Proceeding of the National Consultation on "Suhakam after 3 Years" Recommendations for Protection of Human Rights and the Government's Response。Proceeding of the National Consultation on "Suhakam after 3 Years" Recommendations for Protection of Human Rights and the Government's Response。0。
38.	Era Consumer Malaysia(2000)。Proceedings of Forum on Understanding the Human Rights Commission Act 1999。Proceedings of Forum on Understanding the Human Rights Commission Act 1999。0。
39.	Era Consumer Malaysia(2002)。Proceedings of the National Consultation on "Suhakam after 2 Years" How Has the Commission Played a Role in Promoting and Protecting Human Rights in Malaysia?。Proceedings of the National Consultation on "Suhakam after 2 Years" How Has the Commission Played a Role in Promoting and Protecting Human Rights in Malaysia?。0。
40.	Era Consumer Malaysia(2001)。Proceedings of the National Consultation on "Suhakam after One Year"。Proceedings of the National Consultation on "Suhakam after One Year"。0。
41.	Era Consumer Malaysia(2004)。Proceedings of the National Consultation on Suhakam: After 4 Years "Changing the Human Rights Paradign in Malaysia"。Proceedings of the National Consultation on Suhakam: After 4 Years "Changing the Human Rights Paradign in Malaysia"。0。
42.	United Nations(1995)。Professional Training Series NO. 4 National Human Rights Institutions。Professional Training Series NO. 4 National Human Rights Institutions。Centre for Human Rights。
43.	Suhakam(2004)。Report Round Table Discussion: Rights and Obligations under Cedaw。Report Round Table Discussion: Rights and Obligations under Cedaw。0。
44.	Suhakam(2003)。Review of the Internal Security Act 1960。Review of the Internal Security Act 1960。0。
45.	Suhakam(2004)。Roundtable Discussion on Education for Children with Disabilities。Roundtable Discussion on Education for Children with Disabilities。0。
46.	Era Consumer Malaysia(2002)。Seminar on Understanding Human Rights & Islam: Motivation, Ideology and Relevance in a Contemporary Society。Seminar on Understanding Human Rights & Islam: Motivation, Ideology and Relevance in a Contemporary Society。0。
47.	Hanna, Willard A.(1964)。The Formation of Malaysia New Factor in World Politics。The Formation of Malaysia New Factor in World Politics。0。
48.	Clifford, Mary Louise(1968)。The Land and People of Malaysia。The Land and People of Malaysia。0。
49.	Soong, Kua Kia(2005)。The Malaysian Civil Rights Movement。Malaysia：Strategic Information Research Development (SIRD)。
50.	Wu, Min Aun(2004)。The Malaysian Legal System。The Malaysian Legal System。0。
51.	Kheng, Cheah Boon(1999)。Politics。The Shaping of Malaysia。0。
52.	(1999)。The Shaping of Malaysia。The Shaping of Malaysia。0。
53.	Suhakam(2004)。Trafficking in Women and Children Report of the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia。Trafficking in Women and Children Report of the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia。0。
54.	Nicole, Fritz、Flaherty, Martin(2003)。Unjust Order: Malaysia's Internal Security Act。Unjust Order: Malaysia's Internal Security Act。0。

其他
1.	United Nations(1994)。Fact Sheet No. 19，0。
2.	Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights(2002)。The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Booklet。

圖書論文
1.	廖福特(2004)。聯合國對國家人權委員會之推動與實踐。人權理論與歷史論文集。台北：國史館。延伸查詢
2.	廖福持(200703)。創設國家人權機構--理想、類型及憲。憲法解釋之理論與實務。台北：中央研究院法律學研究所籌備處。延伸查詢

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	聯合國「關於促進和保護人權的國家機構的地位的原則(巴黎原則)」之研究
2.	地方自治體人權保障組織之運作與困境--以臺北市人權保障諮詢委員會為對象
3.	2010年憲法發展回顧
4.	從馬來西亞的「阿拉事件」看宗教衝突與對話
5.	菲律賓人權委員會--人民力量之興起與失落
6.	愛爾蘭人權委員會--和平與人權之互動
7.	對話、共識與互助--推動「國家人權機構」之國協模式
8.	南韓國家人權委員會--國際人權在國內體制實踐
9.	泰國國家人權委員會之設立及發展--在軍事政變與民主立憲之間
10.	「憲政體制與國際人權：馬來西亞及南韓國家人權委員會之研究」分支計畫簡介
11.	從伊斯蘭法的公共論述看馬來西亞社群主義的建構
12.	馬來西亞伊斯蘭律法的變遷--一個殖民現代化的例子

1.	監察院國家人權委員會之研究─以「巴黎原則」為中心
2.	從後殖民觀點探討馬來西亞的「政治伊斯蘭」運動
3.	邊界與認同：泰國共同體的建構與挑戰

國家人權委員會

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫