:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:唐朝官方放貸機構試論
書刊名:臺灣師大歷史學報
作者:羅彤華 引用關係
作者(外文):Lo, Tung-hwa
出版日期:2007
卷期:38
頁次:頁1-28
主題關鍵詞:官本錢放貸機構比部判官管理TangOfficial capital moneyLoan organizationPi-PuDepartment of judicial controlExecutive officerManagement
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:18
中國自唐代起,官府大量用放貸法來籌措財源。有學者以為,比部是官本的最高行政管理機構,但這項論斷可能是個誤解。京司官本係由各司獨立經營,比部只從事財務檢查,非官本的直接負責人。各司官本的管理者,是該司處理財務的判官,即使利錢供其他單位使用,也採專司辦理,事權集中的原則,以節省人力,提高效率。至於本錢的實際經營者,則是判官之下的屬吏或屬司。地方官本的管理者,也不是州縣的勾官,而是如京司那樣,由判官負責,亦即主管官本放貸的人是倉曹參軍或縣尉。如出土文書所見,地方官本的經營相當複雜,一項業務可能同時關係到各單位,因此需靠長官或更高層級的官府,監督、協調本錢的運用與催徵。
Since the Tang Dynasty In China, the government used the loan system to collect revenue. Some scholars thought that Pi-Pu (Department of Judicial Control) was the highest administrative organization in charge of the official capital, but this speculation could be wrong. The official loan of the capital city was managed by different government organizations independently, Pi-Pu was only responsible for financial control, not responsible for direct management. The manager of the official loan was the executive officer in charge of the financial business of that organization, even if the interest money was designated to be used by other government organizations, however, the official loan was under central control system in order to reduce the personnel cost and to increase efficiency. The actual manager of the official capital money was the subordinate under the executive officer. The manager of the official loan of different districts was not the auditor, just like in the capital city, the executive officer was in charge of the official loan, but the actual manager was the senior administrator of prefectural granary section and county commandant. As shown by Dunhuang-Turfan manuscripts, the management of the official loan of various districts was very complicated, the loan business could involve many organizations, therefore the control and coordination on the operation and pay-back of the capital money by the senior officer of the higher level office was very important.
期刊論文
1.羅彤華(2005)。唐代病坊隸屬與經營問題小考--中國社會救濟事業的進展。魏晉南北朝隋唐史資料,22,75-84。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.羅彤華(2000)。唐代食利本錢初探。第五屆唐代文化學術研討會。高雄:麗文文化。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.池田温(1979)。中国古代籍帳研究。東京:東京大学東洋文化研究所。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Yamamoto, Tatsuro、Ikeda, On(1987)。Tun-huang and Turfan Documents concerning Social and Economic History(III)。Tun-huang and Turfan Documents concerning Social and Economic History(III)。Tokyo。  new window
2.陳國燦(199502)。斯坦因所獲吐魯番文書研究。武漢:武漢大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.李錦繡(1995)。唐代財政史稿。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.李昉(1965)。文苑英華。台北:華聯出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.王永興(1991)。唐勾檢制研究。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.王溥(1974)。唐會要。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.孫繼民(2000)。敦煌吐魯番所出唐代軍事文書初探。北京:中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.宋敏求(1972)。唐大詔令集。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.歐陽修、宋祁(1976)。新唐書。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.韓愈、馬其昶(1975)。韓昌黎集。河洛圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.張國剛(1987)。唐代官制。西安:三秦出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.董誥(1983)。全唐文。中華。  延伸查詢new window
13.李林甫、陳仲夫(1992)。唐六典。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.唐耕耦、陸宏基(1986)。敦煌社會經濟文獻真跡釋錄(第一輯)。敦煌社會經濟文獻真跡釋錄(第一輯)。  延伸查詢new window
15.程志、韓濱娜(1987)。唐代的州和道。唐代的州和道。西安。  延伸查詢new window
16.王永興(1993)。唐天寶敦煌差科簿研究─兼論唐代色役制度和其他問題。陳門問學叢稿。南昌。  延伸查詢new window
17.陳國燦(2002)。莫高窟北區47窟新出唐貸錢折糧帳的性質。敦煌學史事新證。甘肅。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(宋)王欽若(1972)。冊府元龜,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.嚴耕望(1969)。唐代方鎮使府僚佐考。唐史研究叢稿。新亞研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE