臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：論羅爾斯的公共理性觀
書刊名：國立臺灣大學哲學論評
作者：吳澤玫 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wu, Tse-mei
出版日期：2008
卷期：36
頁次：頁193-235
主題關鍵詞：羅爾斯；公共理性；群眾理性；政治共識；民主公民；Rawls；Public reason；Plebiscitory reason；Political consensus；Democratic citizens
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:44
本文的目的在於闡明羅爾斯的公共理性觀念，並對之提出分析與批判。對羅爾斯而言，公共理性是民主公民身份的一種理想，它要求人們只能根據所有公民都能合理接受的理由來進行基本政治問題的討論。於是，公共理性可以在當代自由社會具合理多元的既定事實下，促成政治共識的產生。 在這篇文章裡，筆者首先檢視羅爾斯提出的公共理性觀念。其次，筆者將討論四種對公共理性的批評。第三，筆者將分析羅爾斯晚期對公共理性觀念的修正是否、以及如何能夠對這些批評做出回應。在結論中筆者將指出，若缺乏具良好素養的公民，則羅爾斯依然無法解決群眾理性的問題。
The aim of this essay is to elucidate John Rawls's idea o public reason and its limits. According to Rawls, public reason is an ideal of democratic citizenship, which requires that the public discussion of fundamental political questions should be conducted solely in terms of reasons all citizens can reasonably be expected to endorse. Public reason can therefore produce a political consensus given the fact of reasonable pluralism of a liberal society. In this essay, I will begin by examining the idea of public reason proposed by Rawls. Next, I will consider four objections to this idea. Third, I will critically analyze whether and how the modified view of Rawls's latest thoughts on public reason can replay to these objections. In conclusion, I point out that, without well-educated citizens, Rawls cannot resolve the problem of plebiscitory reason.
期刊論文
1.Rawls, John(1995)。Reply to Habermas。The Journal of Philosophy，92(3)，132-180。  new window
2.Cohen, Joshua(1994)。A More Democratic Liberalism。Michigan Law Review，92(6)，1503-1546。  new window
3.Solum, Lawrence B.(1994)。Inclusive Public Reason。Pacific Philosophical Quarterly，75(3/4)，217-231。  new window
4.Bohman, James(1995)。Public Reason and Cultural Pluralism: Political Liberalism and the Problem of Moral Conflict。Political Theory，23(2)，253-279。  new window
5.Galston, William A.(1989)。Pluralism and Social Unity。Ethics，99(4)，711-726。  new window
6.Reidy, David A.(2000)。Rawls's Wide View of Public Reason: Not Wide Enough。Res Publica，6(1)，49-72。  new window
7.Chambers, Simone(2004)。Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation。The Journal of Political Philosophy，12(4)，389-410。  new window
8.Leedes, Gary C.(1993)。Rawls's Excessively Secular Political Conception。University of Richmond Law Review，27，1083-1126。  new window
9.Macedo, Stephen(1988)。Liberal Virtues, Constitutional Community。The Review of Politics，50(2)，215-240。  new window
10.Marrneffe, Peter de(1994)。Rawls's Idea of Public Reason。Pacific Philosophical Quarterly，75(3)/75(4)，232-250。  new window
11.Quinn, Philip L.(1995)。Political Liberalisms and Their Exclusions of the Religious。Proceedings and addresses of the American Philosophical Association，69(2)，35-56。  new window
12.Wall, Steven P.(1996)。Public Justification and the Transparency Argument。The Philosophical Quarterly，46(185)，501-507。  new window
圖書
1.Gutmann, Amy、Thompson, Danis(1996)。Democracy and Disagreement。Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
2.Rawls, John(1993)。Political Liberalism。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Rawls, John(1999)。A Theory of Justice。Harvard University Press。  new window
4.Rawls, John(1999)。Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory。John Rawls: Collect Papers。Cambridge, Mass.。  new window
5.Rawls, John(1999)。Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical。John Rawls: Collect Papers。Cambridge, Mass.。  new window
圖書論文
1.Larmore, Charles(2003)。Public Reason。The Cambridge Companion to Rawls。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Rawls, John(1999)。The Idea of Public Reason Revisited。John Rawls: Collected Papers。Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Sandel, Michael J.(1998)。A Response to Rawls' Political Liberalism。Liberalism and the limits of Justice。Cambridge, Mass.：Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：722（臺灣：703，外國：19） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1473665 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67288749
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上