臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：不同佈題模式對學生論證表現的影響
書刊名：科學教育學刊
作者：黃翎斐／張文華／林陳涌 引用關係
作者(外文)：Huang, Ling-fei／Chang, Wen-hua／Lin, Chen-yung
出版日期：2008
卷期：16:4
頁次：頁375-393
主題關鍵詞：論證；對話分析；Argumentation；Discourse analysis
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:47
期刊論文
1.Simon, S.、Osborne, J.、Erduran, S.(2004)。TAPping into Argumentation: Developments in the Application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse。Science Education，88(6)，915-933。  new window
2.Zohar, A.、Nemet, F.(2002)。Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，39(1)，35-62。  new window
3.Cohen, E. G.(1994)。Restructuring in the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups。Reviews of Educational Research，64(1)，1-35。  new window
4.Kelly, G. J.、Takao, A.(2002)。Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students' use of evidence in writing。Science Education，86(3)，314-342。  new window
5.Osborne, J.、Erduran, S.、Simon, S.(2004)。Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，41(10)，994-1020。  new window
6.Yore, L. D.、Bisanz, G. L.、Hand, B. M.(2003)。Examining the Literacy Component of Science Literacy: 25 Years of Language Arts and Science Research。International Journal of Science Education，25(6)，689-725。  new window
7.Kuhn, D.(1993)。Science as argument: Implication for teaching and learning scientific thinking。Science Education，77(3)，319-317。  new window
8.楊文金(19980400)。「同儕科學家意像」對訊息合理性判斷的影響分析。師大學報．科學教育類，43(1)，1-17。  延伸查詢new window
9.Driver, R.、Newton, P.、Osborne, J.(2000)。Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms。Science Education，84(3)，287-312。  new window
10.Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P.、Rodríguez, A. B.、Duschl, R. A.(2000)。"Doing the lesson" or "doing science": Argument in high school genetics。Science Education，84(6)，757-792。  new window
11.Newton, P.、Driver, R.、Osborne, J.(1999)。The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science。International Journal of Science Education，21(5)，553-576。  new window
12.Niaz, M.、Robinson, W. R.(1991)。Performance Based on Instruction by Lecture and by Interaction and Its Relationship to Cognitive Variables。International Journal of Science Education，13(2)，203-215。  new window
13.Gayford, C.(1993)。Discussion-based Group Work Related to Environmental Issue in Science Classes with 15-year-old Pupils in England。International Journal of Science Education，15(5)，521-529。  new window
14.van Eemeren, F. H.(1995)。A World of Difference: The Rich State of Argumentation Theory。Informal Logic，17(2)，144-158。  new window
15.Simonneaux, L.(2001)。Role-play or Dabate to Promote Students' Argumentation and Justification on an Issue in Animal Transgenesis。International Journal of Science Education，23(9)，903-927。  new window
16.Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P.、Pereiro-Munoz, C.(2002)。Knowledge Procedures or Knowledge Consumers? Argumentation and Decision Making about Environmental Management。International Journal of Science Education，24(11)，1171-1190。  new window
17.Osborne, J.、Duschl, R. A.(2002)。Supporting and Promting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education。Studies in Science Edcuation，38(1)，39-72。  new window
18.Dyke, A. J. V.、Voss, J. F.、Van Dyke, J. A.(2001)。Argumentation in Psychology: Background Comments。Discourse Processes，32(2/ 3)，89-111。  new window
會議論文
1.Lopez-Rodriguez, R.、Erduran, S.、Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P.(2005)。Argumentative Quality and Intellectual Ecology: A Case Study in Primary School。0。  new window
圖書
1.Latour, Bruno、Woolgar, Steve(1979)。Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts。Los Angeles。  new window
2.Hempel, Carl G.(1965)。Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essay in the Philosophy of Science。New York：Free Press。  new window
3.Kuhn, D.(1991)。The skill of argument。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Toulmin, Stephen E.(1958)。The Use of Argument。Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Wellington, J. J.、Osborne, J.(2001)。Language and literacy in science education。Open University Press。  new window
6.Vygotsky, Lev S.(1962)。Thought and language。Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press。  new window
7.Danielle, E.、Warnick, B.、Inch, E. S.(2002)。Critical Thinking and Communication: The Use of Reason in Argument。Critical Thinking and Communication: The Use of Reason in Argument。Boston, MA。  new window
8.Showers, B.、Weil, M.、Joyce, B.(1992)。Models of Teachings。Models of Teachings。Boston, MA。  new window
9.Pinch, T.、Collins, H.(1994)。The Golem: What Everyone Should Know about Science。The Golem: What Everyone Should Know about Science。New York, NY。  new window
10.Krummheuer, G.(1995)。The Ethnography of Argumentation。Emergence of Mathematical Meaning。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
11.Coburn, A.(1998)。Constructivism and Science Teaching。Constructivism and Science Teaching。Bloomington, IN。  new window
圖書論文
1.Flanders, N. A.(1964)。Some Relationships among Teacher Influence, Pupil Attitudes, and Achievement。Contemporary Research on Teacher Effectiveness。New York, NY：Holt, Rinehart and Winston。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1150（臺灣：1136，外國：14） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1725833 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67532781
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上