方素珍（譯）（2003）。一隻聖誕雞（原著者：N. Daly）。台北：台灣東方。（原著出版年：2002）
王彥筑（譯）（2015）。小恐龍幫大忙（原著者：D. Bedford）。台北：三之三。（原著出版年：2012）
余治瑩（譯）（2001）。奧力佛是個娘娘腔（原著者：T. DePaola) 。台北：三之三。（原著出版年：1979）
吳明隆、涂金堂（2005）。SPSS 與統計應用分析。台北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
呂嘉能（譯）（2013）。好消息壞消息（原著者：J. Mack）。台北：三之三。（原著出版年：2012）
李松濤、林煥祥、洪振方（2010）。探究式教學對學童科學論證能力影響之探究。科學教育學刊，18（3），177-203。
谷瑞勉（譯）（2001）。教室中的維高斯基：仲介的讀寫教學與評量（原編者：L. Dixon-Krauss）。臺北市：心理出版社（原著出版年：1996）。
林樹聲、黃柏鴻（2009）。國小六年級學生在社會性科學議題教學中之論證能力研究─ 不同學業成就學生間之比較。科學教育學刊，17（2），111-133。林碧珍（2015）。國小三年級課室以數學臆測活動引發學生論證初探。科學教育學刊，23（1），83-110。柯倩華（譯）（2003）。蘇菲的傑作（原著者：E. Spinelli）。台北：維京。（原著出版年：2004）
柯華葳、詹益綾（2006）。國民小學 (二至六年級) 閱讀理解篩選測驗.。台北：教育部。洪振方、林裕仁、魏子婷（2010）。 專精教師與生手教師經營論證教學的分析與比較。科學教育學刊，18（3），205-227。孫晴峰（譯）（1995）。老鼠牙醫地嗖頭（原著者：W. Steig）。台北：上誼文化。
154
（原著出版年：1982）
張民杰（2012）。台灣教育學術領域應用案例教學法的回顧與展望。教育與多元文化研究，7，1-36。陳文正、古智雄、許瑛玿、楊文金（2011）。概念卡通論證教學促進學童論證能力之研究。科學教育學刊，19（1）， 69-99。陳英娥（2002）。教室中的數學論證之研究。教育研究資訊，10（6），111-132。陳鳳如、郭生玉（2000）。閱讀與寫作整合的寫作歷程模式之適配度研究。師大學報：教育類，45（1），1-18。黃柏鴻、林樹聲（2007）。論證教學相關實證性研究之回顧與省思。科學教育月刊，302，5-20。
游梓翔（2003）。 認識辯論。台北：雙葉書廊。
黃翎斐、胡瑞萍（2006）。論證與科學教育的理論和實務。科學教育月刊，292，15-28。
黃翎斐、張文華、林陳涌（2008）。不同佈題模式對學生論證表現的影響。科學教育學刊，16（4）， 375-393。楊茂秀（譯）（1997）。小豬離家計（原著者：A. Lobel）。台北：遠流。（原著出版年：1988）
楊茂秀（譯）（1997）。露西兒（原著者：A. Lobel）。台北：遠流。（原著出版年：1964）
楊茂秀（譯）（1999）。星月（原著者：J. Cannon）。台北：三之三。（原著出版年：1993）
楊桂瓊、林煥祥、洪瑞兒（2012）。以論證活動探討國小學童論證能力和科學本質之表現。科學教育學刊，20（2）， 145-170。葉明達、林冠群、陳彥廷（2007）。數學論證的判讀歷程及其教學設計。科學教育研究與發展季刊，48，89-106。
葉明達、柳賢（2004）：建立數學論證判讀認知機制之個案研究。花蓮師院學報（教育類），19，85-118 。
葉明達、柳賢（2005）。幾何論證判讀歷程之個案研究。臺東大學教育學報，16（2）， 43-92。
155
葉明達、柳賢（2007）。建立判讀理解層級:：高中生進行數學論證判讀活動困難之探討。教育心理與研究，30（3），79-109。蜜蠍兒（譯）（2009）。石狐（原作者：J. R. Gardiner）。台北：哈佛人。（原著出版年：1980）
蔡佩穎、張惠博、林雅慧、張文華（2010）。小組立場, 小組組成及文本特性對於學童論證生殖遺傳新聞之效應。科學教育學刊，18（3），253-276。蔡欣玶（譯）（2001）。紙袋公主（原著者： R. N. Munsch, M. Martchenko, & S. Dann）。台北：遠流。（原著出版年：1980）
鄭章華、陳姿靜（2016）。數位素養導向的任務設計與教學實踐──以發展學童的數學論證為例。教科書研究，9（1），109-134。蘇煦智（2014）。以論證活動進行周長與面積概念學習之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東大學，屏東縣。
Anderson, R. C., Chinn, C, Waggoner, M., & Nguyen, K.(1998). Intellectually stimulating story discussions. In J. Osborn & F. Lehr (Eds.), Literacy for all: Issues in teaching and learning (pp. 170–186). New York: Guilford.
Anderson, R. C., Chinn, C., Chan, J., Waggoner, M., & Yi, H. (1997). On the logical integrity of children's arguments. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 135-167.
Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., McNurlen, B., Archodidou, A., Kim, S.-Y., Reznitskaya, A., Tillmans, M.,& Gilbert, L.(2001). The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children. Cognition and Instruction, 19, 1-46.
Andriessen, J.(2006).Arguing to learn. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 443–459). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (Eds.). (2013). Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (Vol. 1). Springer Science & Business Media.
Angell, R. B.(1964). Reasoning and logic. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Au, K. H., & Mason, J. M. (1981). Social organizational factors in learning to read: The balance of rights hypothesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 115–152.
Baker, M. J. (2004). Recherches sur l'élaboration de connaissances dans le dialogue [Research on knowledge elaboration in dialogues]. Synthèse pour l'habilitation à diriger les recherches. Université Nancy 2.
Bellmore, A. D., & Nishina, A. (2007). The influence of classroom ethnic composition on same and other ethnicity peer nominations in middle school. Social Development, 16, 720–740.
Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Binkley, R.W. (1995). Argumentation, education, and reasoning. Informal Logic, 17, 127–143.
Bonney, C. R., & Sternberg, R. J. (2011). Learning to think critically. In R. E. Mayer and P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction(pp.166-196). New York, Routledge.
158
Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Heinemann: Portsmouth.
Cazden, C. B., & Beck, S. W. (2003). Classroom discourse. In Graesser, A. C., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Goldman, S. R. (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes(pp. 165-197). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Chinn, C. A. (2006). Learning to argue. In O'Donnell, A. M., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Erkens, G. (Eds.), Collaborative learning, reasoning, and technology(pp.355- 383). New York: Routledge.
Chinn, C. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1998). The Structure of Discussions that Promote Reasoning. Teachers College Record, 100(2), 315-68.
Chinn, C. A., Anderson, R. C., & Waggoner, M. A. (2001). Pattern of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 378–411.
Clark, A.-M., Anderson, R. C., Kuo, L.-J., Kim, I.-H., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2003). Collaborative Reasoning: Expanding ways for children to talk and think in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 181-198.
Cohen, J.(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
Dong, T., Anderson, R. C., Kim, I.-H., & Li, Y. (2007). Collaborative Reasoning in China and Korea. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(3), 400-424.
Dong, T., Anderson, R. C., Li, Y., & Kim, I. (2006). Language of home and school: Discourse mismatch reconsidered. Champaign: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
Dong, T., Anderson, R. C., Lin, T.-J., & Wu, X. (2009). Concurrent student-managed discussions in a large class. International Journal of Educational Research, 48, 352–367.
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science education, 84(3), 287-312.
Duschl, R., & Schweingruber, H. H., and A. Shouse.(Eds.)(2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K–8. National Academies Press.
Eggington, W. (1987). Written academic discourse in Korean: Implications for effective communication. In U. Connor & R. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 153–168). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge,
159
MA: MIT Press.
Henderson, J. B., Osborne, J., MacPherson, A., & Szu, E. (2014). A new learning progression for student argumentation in scientific contexts. In E-Book Proceedings of the ESERA 2013 Conference: Science Education Research for Evidence-Based Teaching and Coherence in Learning (Vol. 7, pp. 26-42).
Hogan, K. (1999). Thinking aloud together: A test of an intervention to foster students' collaborative scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1085-1109.Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (1999). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and instruction, 17(4), 379-432.
Howe, C. and Mercer, N. (2007).Children's Social Development, Peer Interaction and Classroom Learning (Primary Review Research Survey 2/1b), Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
Jaddallah, M., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Miller, B., Kim, I.-H., Kuo, L.-J., Wu, W., & Dong, T. (2011). Influence of a teacher's scaffolding moves during child-led small-group discussions. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 194-230.
Jadallah, M., Miller, B., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Zhang, J., Archodidou, A., & Grabow, K. (2009). Collaborative Reasoning about a science and public policy issue. In Margaret McKeown and Linda Kucan (Eds.), Bringing Reading Research to Life (pp.170-193). New York: Guilford Publications.
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of educational Psychology, 80(4), 437-447.
Kim, I., Anderson R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., & Archodidiou, A. (2007). Discourse patterns in children’s collaborative online discussions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 333-370.
Kim, I.-H., Anderson, R. C., Miller, B., Jeong, J., & Swim, T. (2011). Influence of cultural norms and collaborative discussions on children's reflective essays. Discourse Processes, 48(7), 501-528.
Kim, S. (2001). The effects of group monitoring on transfer of learning in small group discussions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
160
Kim, S., Anderson, R., McNurlen, B., Archodidou, A., Nguyen-Jahiel, K.,Reznitskaya, A. (2002). Do Fourth Graders Prefer Open or Teacher-Controlled Discussions? Center for the Study of Reading, Champaign, IL.
Kozulin, A. (2001). Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Harvard University Press.
Kuhn, D. (1992). Thinking as argument. Harvard Educational Review, 62(2), 155–177.
Kuhn, D. (2001). How do people know? Psychological Science, 12, 1–8.
Kuhn, D., & Franklin, S. (2006). The second decade: What develops (and how). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Kuo, L., Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R.C., Kim, I., Nguyen, K., Clark, A., et al. (2007). From group to individual argumentation: Investigating the connection. Paper presented at the symposium entitled ‘Text comprehension, argumentation skill, and self-regulation’, The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
Lawson, A. E. (2002). Sound and Faulty Arguments Generated by Preservice Biology Teachers When Testing Hypotheses Involving Unobservable Entities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(33), 237-252.
Li, Y., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Dong, T., Archodidou, A., Kim, I.-H., Kuo, L.-J., Clark, A., Wu, X., Jadallah, M., & Miller, B. (2007). Emergent leadership in children’s discussion groups. Cognition and Instruction, 25(1), 75-111.
Lin, T.-J., Anderson, R. C., Hummel, J. E., Jadallah, M., & Miller, B. (2012). Children’s use of analogy during collaborative reasoning. Child Development, 83, 1429-1443.
Lin, T. J., Anderson, R. C., Jadallah, M., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Kim, I. H., Kuo, L. J., ... & Li, Y. (2015). Social influences on children's development of relational thinking during small-group discussions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 83-97.
Lin, T.-J., Horng, R.-Y., & Anderson, R. C. (2014). Effects of argument scaffolding and source credibility on science text comprehension. The Journal of Experimental Education, 82(2), 264-282.
161
Ma, S., Zhang, J., Anderson, R. C., Morris, J., Nguyen-Jahiel, K. T., Miller, B., ... & Hsu, Y. L. (2016). Children's Productive Use of Academic Vocabulary. Discourse Processes, 1-22.
Mayer, R. E. (1985). Structural analysis of science prose: Can we increase problem solving performance? In B. K. Britton & J. B. Black (Eds.), Understanding of expository text (pp. 65–87). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
McNurlen, B. (1998). The Pinewood derby. Champaign, IL: Center for the Study of Reading.
Meiland, J. (1989). Argument as inquiry and argument as persuasion. Argumentation, 3, 189–196.
Miller, B., Anderson, R.C., Li, Y., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Jadallah, M., Dong, T., et al. (2008). Emerging participation of quiet students in collaborative discussions. Unpublished manuscript.
Moshman, D.,& Geil, M. (1998). Collaborative reasoning: Evidence for collective rationality. Thinking & Reasoning, 4(3), 231-248.
Murphy, P. K. (2007). The eye of the beholder: The interplay of social and cognitive components in change. Educational Psychologist, 42(1), 41-53.
Murphy, P. K., Wilkinson, I. A. G., & Soter, A. O. (2011). Instruction based on discussion. In R. E. Mayer and P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction(pp.382-407). NY: Routledge.
Murphy, P. K., Wilkinson, I. A., Soter, A. O., Hennessey, M. N., & Alexander, J. F. (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 740-764.
Nussbaum, E. M. (2012). Argumentation and student-centered learning environments. In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical Foundations of Student-Centered Learning Environments (pp. 114–141). New York: Routledge.
Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463-466.
Piaget, J. (1995). Sociological studies. London: Routledge.
Reznitskaya, A. (2012). Dialogic teaching: Rethinking language use during literature discussions. The Reading Teacher, 65(7), 446-456.
Reznitskaya, A., & Anderson, R. C. (2002). The argument schema and learning to
162
reason. In M. Pressley and C. Block (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices(pp.170-185). New York: Guilford Publishing.
Reznitskaya, A., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Analyzing argumentation in rich, natural contexts. Informal Logic, 26(2), 175-198.
Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R. C., Dong, T., Li, Y., Kim, I.-H., & Kim, S.-Y. (2008). Learning to think well: Applications of argument schema theory to literacy instruction. In C. C. Block & S. R. Parris (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (2nd ed., pp. 196–213). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Reznitskaya, A., & Glina, M. (2013). Comparing Student Experiences with Story Discussions in Dialogic Versus Traditional Settings. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(1), 49-63.
Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R. C., McNurlen, B., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Archodidou, A., & Kim, S. Y. (2001). Influence of oral discussion on written argument. Discourse processes, 32(2-3), 155-175.
Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R.C., & Kuo, L.-J. (2007). Teaching and learning argumentation. The Elementary School Journal, 107(5), 449–472.
Reznitskaya, A., Glina, M., Carolan, B., Michaud, O., Rogers, J., & Sequeira, L. (2012). Examining transfer effects from dialogic discussions to new tasks and contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(4), 288-306.
Reznitskaya, A., Kuo, L. J., Glina, M., & Anderson, R. C. (2009). Measuring argumentative reasoning: What's behind the numbers?. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 219-224.
Reznitskaya, A., Kuo, L.-J., Clark, A.-M., Miller, B., Jadallah, M., Anderson, R.C., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2009). Collaborative reasoning: a dialogic approach to group discussions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39 (1), 29-48.
Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind(pp. 139–164). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Rowe, M. B. (1974). Wait-time and Rewards as Instructional Variables: The Influence of learning, logic and fate control. Part 1. Wait Time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11(2), 81-94.
163
Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W. A. (2015). The Influence of Group Dynamics on Collaborative Scientific Argumentation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(2), 335-351.
Sampson, V., & Blanchard, M. R. (2012). Science teachers and scientific argumentation: Trends in views and practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1122-1148.
Shen, F-Y. (2005). Enabling higher-level thinking processes in ESL reading: An examination of three instructional approaches. In The Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp. 249-264).
Siegel, H. (1995). Why should educators care about argumentation. Informal Logic, 17(2), 159–176.
Snow, C. E., & Biancarosa, G. (2003). Adolescent literacy and the achievement gap: What do we know and where do we go from here?. New York: Carnegie Corporation.
Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Boxtel, C., Van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and instruction, 10(4), 311-330.
Vygotsky, L. S. & Rieber, R. W. (1988). The collected works of LS Vygotsky: Volume 1: Problems of general psychology, including the volume Thinking and Speech (Vol. 1). Springer Science & Business Media.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1968). Thought and language (newly revised, translated, and edited by Alex Kozulin). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1981). The genesis of higher order mental functions. In J. W. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–184). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
Waggoner, M., Chinn, C., Yi, H., & Anderson, R. C. (1995). Collaborative Reasoning about stories. Language Arts, 72, 582-589.
Walton, D. N. (1990). What is reasoning? What is an argument? The Journal of Philosophy, 87(8), 399– 419.
164
Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2005, April). Overview and a Conceptual Framework for Discussions. Engaging students in discussions to promote high-level comprehension of texts .Symposium conducted at the Reading Research conference of the International Reading Association, San Antonio, TX.
Wilkinson, I. A. G., Soter, A. O., & Murphy, P. K. (2007). Group discussions as a mechanism for promoting high-level comprehension of text: Final grant performance report (PR/Award No. R305G020075). Columbus, OH: Ohio.
Wu, X., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., & Miller, B. (2013). Enhancing motivation and engagement through collaborative discussion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3),622-632.
Young, R. (1992). Critical theory and classroom talk. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters, Ltd.
Zhang, J., Anderson, R. C., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2013). Language-rich discussions for English language learners. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 44-60.
Zhang, X., Anderson, R. C., Dong, T., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Li, Y., Lin, T. J., & Miller, B. (2013). Children’s moral reasoning: influence of culture and collaborative discussion. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 13(5), 503-522.
Zhang, X., Anderson, R. C., Morris, J., Miller, B., Nguyen-Jahiel, K. T., Lin, T. J., ... & Latawiec, B. (2015). Improving children’s competence as decision makers contrasting effects of collaborative interaction and direct instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 53(1), 194-223.