:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Student Engagement and Learning Performance at a University in Transition: An Experience from Taiwan
書刊名:屏東教育大學學報. 教育類
作者:張淑芬 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Shu-fen
出版日期:2008
卷期:31
頁次:頁73-99
主題關鍵詞:單一性別男女合校學生參與度學習成效Single-sexCoeducationStudent engagementLearning outcomes
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:48
不同類型的大學,包括單一性別(純女校或純男校)及男女合校,對於男、女學生的學習可能有不同的影響,因而導致不同的學習經驗與成果。本研究旨於探討台南科技大學由純女校轉型為男女合校的過渡時期中,有關學生學習參與度及其學習成果的相關議題。 本研究根據亞斯丁博士的學生投入學習理論以及輸入-環境-產出模式,調查學生投入學習的參與度及其學習成果是否與學校環境為單一性別或是男女合校有關聯,研究資料係經由問卷調查和學生成績而來。問卷調查使用的是學生投入學習問卷中文版,共計發出560份,收回537份,回收率達96%。而學生成績則是由校方提供,共含三項成績,分別為大一英文 (N=1,198),電腦資訊與應用(N=1,023),以及學期平均成績 (N=1,719)。研究結果顯示學生投入學習及其學習成果,不論是在不同學習環境(純女生班及男女合班)或是在兩性之間皆有顯著差異,意即顯示學校環境的改變確實會造成學生學習上的影響。隨著學校的持續發展,學校環境如何影響學生投入學習及其學習成果,需要校方及師生加以特別地關注。
Different types of institutions, including single-sex and coeducation, may provide students with varied institutional practices which affect both male and female students in various ways, leading to different learning experience and outcomes. In this study, issues related to the transition from a single-sex to a coeducational university, student engagement, and learning outcomes at Tainan University of Technology (TUT) in Taiwan were examined. Based on Astin’s theory of student involvement and input-environment-outcome (I-E-O) model, this study investigated whether student engagement and learning outcomes were independent of single-sex or coeducational college environment. Data were collected through surveys and from students’ academic scores. A Chinese version of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) questionnaire has been distributed to a convenience sample of 560 students, where 537 of them were returned, and resulted in a response rate of 96%. From random samples, students’ academic scores in English (N=1,198) and Computer and Information Application (N=1,023), as well as semester average scores (N=1,719) were obtained from the authorities of TUT. Pearson correlation and Spearman’s rho were utilized to examine the correlations among variables. Independent-samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and one-way ANOVA with post hoc test were used to investigate the differences between variables. Regarding student engagement and learning outcomes, significant differences and correlations were found between the single-sex and coeducational classes, as well as between the males and females. With the study presented in this paper, it implied that the environmental change at TUT had repercussions in students’ learning; and this needs special attention by all.
期刊論文
1.Canada, K.、Pringle, R.(1995)。The role of gender in college classroom interactions: A social context approach。Sociology of Education,68(3),161-186。  new window
2.Finn, J. D.(1980)。Sex differences in educational outcomes。Sex Roles,6,9-26。  new window
3.Lee, V. E.、Lockheed, M. E.(1990)。The effects of single-sex schooling on achievement and attitudes in Nigeria。Comparative Education Review,34(2),209-231。  new window
4.Pascarella, E. T.(2001)。Using student self-reported gains to estimate college impact: A cautionary tale。Journal of College Student Development,42(5),488-492。  new window
5.Riordan, C.(1994)。The value of attending a women's college: Education, occupation, and income benefits。Journal of Higher Education,65(4),486-510。  new window
6.Kuh, G. D.(2001)。Assessing what really matters to student learning。Change,33(3),10-17。  new window
7.Marsh, Herbert W.、Smith, Ian D.、Marsh, Margaret、Owens, Lee(1988)。The transition from single-sex to coeducational high schools: Effects on multiple dimensions of self-concept and on academic achievement。American Educational Research Journal,25(2),237-269。  new window
8.Pascarella, E. T.(2001)。Identifying excellence in undergraduate education: Are we even close?。Change,33(1),19-23。  new window
圖書
1.Johnson, B.、Christensen, L.(2004)。Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches。Allyn & Bacon。  new window
2.Pallant, J.(2005)。SPSS survival manual。New York:Open University Press。  new window
3.Sandler, B. R.、Silverberg, L. A.、Hall, R. M.(1996)。The chilly classroom climate: A guide to improve the education of women。Washington, DC:National Association for Women in Education。  new window
4.Punch, K. F.(1998)。Introduction to social research: Quantitative & qualitative approaches。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
5.Pascarella, E. T.、Terenzini, P. T.(2005)。How college affects students。Jossey-Bass。  new window
6.Kuh, G. D.、Schuh, J. H.、Whitt, E. J.、Andreas, R. E.、Lyons, J. W.、Strange, C. C.、Krehbiel, L. E.、Mackay, K. A.(1991)。Involving colleges: Successful approaches to fostering student learning and development outside the classroom。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
7.Astin, Alexander W.(1985)。Achieving educational excellence: A critical assessment of priorities and practices in higher education。San Francisco, California:Jossey-Bass。  new window
8.Astin, Alexander W.(1977)。Four Critical Years: Effects of College on Beliefs, Attitudes, and Knowledge。Jossey-Bass。  new window
其他
1.Harwarth, I. B.(1999)。A closer look at women's colleges,Washington, DC:U. S. Department of Education。,http://www.edu.gov/pubs/WomensColleges/intro.html, 2007/02/20。  new window
2.Kuh, G. D.(2003)。The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties,http://nees.iub.edu/pdf/conceptual_framework_2003.pdf。  new window
3.Linville, B.(2005)。Women's colleges in co-ed pressure cooker,http://www.womensenews.org/article.cfm/dyn/aid/2299/context/archive, 2006/09/09。  new window
4.Raftery, I.(2004)。Another women's institution, Lesley College of Massachusetts, chooses to go coed,http://chronicle.com/daily/2004/06/20040610tn.htm-15k-, 2006/09/30。  new window
5.Umbach, P. D.,Kinzie, J. L.,Thomas, A. D.,Palmer, M. M.,Kuh, G. D.(2003)。Women students at coeducational and women's colleges: How do their experiences compare?,http://nsse.iub.edu/pdf/research.papers/ASHE_2003_womens_college.pdf, 2006/10/15。  new window
圖書論文
1.Ferren, A. S.、Aylesworth, M. S.(2001)。Using qualitative and quantitative information in academic decision making。Balancing qualitative and quantitative information for effective decision support。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
2.Kuh, G. D.、Umbach, P. D.(2004)。College and character: Insights from the National Survey of Student Engagement。Assessing character outcomes in college。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
3.Miller-Bernal, L.(2002)。Conservative intent, liberating outcomes: The history of coordinate college for women。Gender in policy and practice。New York:RoutledgeFalmer。  new window
4.Sadovnik, A.、Semel, S. F.(2002)。The transition to coeducation at Wheaton College: Conscious coeducation and gender equity in higher education。Gender in policy and practice。New York:RoutledgeFalmer。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE