臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：尋租行為與土地使用分區管制--財產權觀點之分析
書刊名：臺灣土地研究
作者：張剛維／林森田 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chang, Kang-wei／Lin, Sen-tyan
出版日期：2008
卷期：11:2
頁次：頁127-153
主題關鍵詞：土地使用分區管制；尋租行為；制度變遷；財產權；Land zoning control；Rent-seeking behavior；Institutional change；Property rights
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:62
尋租行為的不透明性以及差異的多樣性，使得分析尋租行為時，相對地較為困難，以致於探討尋租行為與土地使用分區管制的研究亦較為缺乏。本研究嘗試以財產權的觀點，透過新制度經濟學（NIE）的財產權分析方法，輔以集體行動的個案，分析現行土地使用分區管制制度下，尋租行為的型態與生產路徑，如何與土地使用分區管制產生因果循環的關聯，繼而造成制度變遷。研究的成果，將反饋到分區管制制度設計的議題上，並提出避免因為尋租行為而產生負面問題的具體建議。本研究的成果，包括對土地使用分區管制變更的動力來源、過程以及政府面對尋租行為的反應等分析見解，值得都市規劃領域研究的參考。
It is difficult to analyze rent-seeking behavior due to its opaqueness and variety. This leads to little studies on the relationship between rent-seeking behavior and zoning. Based on the property rights approach of New Institutional Economics, this paper investigates the rent-seeking behaviors and production paths under the current zoning institution. In addition, it explores the impact of rent-seeking behaviors and the production paths resulting in the change of zoning institution. Studies of collective action are employed to address the above issues. The research suggests solutions to issues related to the institutional design of zoning and methods to avoid negative effects of rent-seeking behavior. Moreover, the paper provides sources and processes of institutional change of zoning and ways government responds to the rent-seeking behaviors for further study.
期刊論文
1.Cole, D. H.、Grossman, P. Z.(2002)。The Meaning of Property Rights: Law versus Economics?。Land Economics，78(3)，317-330。  new window
2.Lai, L. W. C.(1994)。The Economics of Land Use Zoning: A Literature Review an Analysis of the Work of Coase。Town Planning Review，64，77-79。  new window
3.Demsetz, H.(1967)。Towards a Theory of Property Rights。American Economic Review，57(2)，347-359。  new window
4.Alchian, A.、Demsetz, H.(1973)。The Property Rights Paradigm。Journal of Economic History，33(1)，16-27。  new window
5.Coase, R. H.(1937)。The Problem of Social Cost。Journal of Law and Economics，3，1-44。  new window
6.Alchian, Armen A.(1965)。Some Economics of Property Rights。Il Politico，30(4)，816-829。  new window
7.Fischel, William A.(1978)。A Property Rights Approach to Municipal Zoning。Land Economics，54(1)，64-81。  new window
8.Tullock, Gordon(1967)。The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolists and Theft。Western Economic Journal，5(3)，224-232。  new window
9.Mills, D. E.(1989)。Is Zoning a Negative-Sum Game?。Land Economics，65，1-12。  new window
10.Alchian, Armen A.、Demsetz, Harold(1972)。Production Information Costs, and Economic Organization。American Economic Review，62(5)，777-795。  new window
11.Libecap, G. D.(1986)。Property Rights in Economic History: Implications for Research。Explorations in Economic History，23(3)，227-252。  new window
12.Krueger, Anne O.(1974)。The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society。American Economic Review，64(3)，291-303。  new window
13.Pogodzinski, J. M.、Sass, T. R.(1990)。The Economic Theory of Zoning: A Critical Review。Land Economics，66(3)，294-313。  new window
14.Adsadoorian, M. O.、Asadoorian, M. O.(1999)。Is Zoning a Positive-Sum Game?。Studies in Economics and Finance，19(2)，3-24。  new window
會議論文
1.Webster, C.(2005)。Property Rights, Planning and Markets: Managing Spontaneous Cities。0：長榮大學土地管理與開發學系暨研究所。6-24。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳建元(2006)。土地使用制度的選擇與產權結構關係之研究－制度經濟的觀點與應用。0。358-375。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.台北市政府建設局暨主計處(2005)。台北內湖科技園區暨南港軟體工業園區廠商調查分析報告。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.Evans, A. W.(1982)。Externalities, Rent-seeking and Town Planning。England。  new window
學位論文
1.Staley, S. R.(1997)。Urban Planning and Economic Development: A Transaction-cost Approach。  new window
圖書
1.Webster, Christopher J.、黎偉聰(2003)。Property Rights, Planning, and Markets: Managing Spontaneous Cities。Cheltenham：Edward Elgar Publishing Limited。  new window
2.Nelson, R. H.(1977)。Zoning and Property Rights : An Analysis of the American System of Land-Use Regulation。Cambridge：The MIT Press。  new window
3.徐仁輝、陳敦源、黃光雄、Tullock, G.(2005)。政府失靈：公共選擇的初探。臺北：智勝文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.Coase, Ronald H.、陳坤銘、李華夏(1995)。廠商、市場與法律。臺北：遠流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Lai, Lawrence Wai-chung(1998)。Zoning and Property Rights-A Hong Kong Case Study。Hong Kong University press。  new window
6.Barzel, Yoram(1997)。Economics Analysis of Property Rights。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Fischel, W. A.(1987)。The Economics of Zoning Laws: A Property Rights Approach to American Land Use Controls。Baltimore：The Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
8.Eggertsson, Thráinn(1990)。Economic Behavior and Institutions。Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Coase, Ronald Harry(1988)。The Firm, The Market, and The Law。University of Chicago Press。  new window
10.Yin, Robert K.(2003)。Case Study Research: Design and Methods。Sage Publications。  new window
11.Khan, M. H.、Sundaram, J. K.(2000)。Rent, Rent-Seeking and Economic Development - Theory and Evidence in Asia。Rent, Rent-Seeking and Economic Development - Theory and Evidence in Asia。Cambridge。  new window
12.Nelson, R. H.(1989)。Zoning Myth and Practice - From Euclid into the Future。Zoning and American Dream: Promise Still to Keep。Chicago, IL。  new window
13.邊泰明(2003)。地使用規劃與財產權。地使用規劃與財產權。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：338（臺灣：335，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1451226 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67265006
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上