:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從財產權觀點檢視政府的土地使用變更政策
書刊名:中國行政評論
作者:胡海豐
作者(外文):Hu, Hai-feng
出版日期:2003
卷期:13:1
頁次:頁57-96
主題關鍵詞:財產權隱藏性財富土地使用變更土地使用分區管制開發許可制Property rightImplicit wealthLand use conversionZoningPlanning permission
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:444
  • 點閱點閱:185
本文基於執政當局(決策者)亦有自利動機的假設,說明執政當局在使用其獨佔性權力時,對於財產權的創設與配置的決策行為。並以此分析在土地使用分區管制、發展權移轉制度、及加入「協商」機制的開發許可制等制度下,執政當局如何藉著對土地所有權的絕對性加以限制,使得這些制度在某種程度上皆成為執政當局一種「財富儲藏」的工具。當土地做使用上的變更時,裡面蘊藏的「隱藏性財富」則藉由回饋、繳納代金等不同的方式釋放出來。因此「土地使用變更」變成執政者的一項「財政工具」。文中並以財產權的創設與配置的概念說明在「土地使用變更」的政策上,Colwell ( 1997 )所提出的「Tender Offer System 」制度,不管在「效率」及「公平」的考量上,都優於上述相關的土地制度。最後並以台灣及美國關於土地使用變更紛爭的資料,來說明其紛爭的原因可能絕大部份即在於土地財產權的不當或錯誤配置。
Based on the assumption that the decision-makers of government authority are also self-interested. this paper investigates the behavior of decision-makers about the creation and allocation of land property right when they employ their monopoly power on the regulations of land use. Land use control will be an instrument of "wealth hoarding" for the government. when there is a land use change, the government will catch the "implicit wealth" by different ways. and then the "land use change" becomes a "financial instrument" of the government. In the policy of land use change, by using the property right approaching, this paper shows that the T ender Offer Systems is better than the Zoning and Planning Permission Systems in terms of equity and efficiency. Finally, this paper indicates that the land property right is misassigned by using the data of Taiwan and U.S..
期刊論文
1.Buchanan, James M.(1987)。The Constitution of Economic Policy。American Economic Review,77(3),243-250。  new window
2.Niskanen, William A.(1975)。Bureaucrats and Politicians。The Journal of Law and Economics,18(3),617-643。  new window
3.Crone, Theodore M.(1983)。Elements of an Economic Justification for Municipal Zoning。Journal of Urban Economics,14,168-183。  new window
4.Auld, D. A. L.(1982)。Land-use, non-Conformity and re-Zoning: Is there an alternative?。Urban Law and Policy,5,87-97。  new window
5.Coase, R. H.(1937)。The Problem of Social Cost。Journal of Law and Economics,3,1-44。  new window
6.Colwell, Peter F.(1997)。Tender Mercies: Efficient and Equitable Land Use Change。Real Estate Economics,25(4),525-537。  new window
7.Martinez, R. J.、Dacin, M. T.(1999)。Efficiency Motives and Normative Forces: Combining Transactions Costs and Institutional Logic。Journal of Management,25(1),75-96。  new window
8.邊泰明(19940500)。土地使用變更與財產權配置。土地經濟年刊,5,189-212。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Fischel, William A.(1978)。A Property Rights Approach to Municipal Zoning。Land Economics,54(1),64-81。  new window
10.Mills, D. E.(1989)。Is Zoning a Negative-Sum Game?。Land Economics,65,1-12。  new window
11.張慈佳(20000700)。地方經濟之政治景氣循環現象--以臺灣地區之縣市長選舉為例。國家科學委員會研究彙刊‧人文及社會科學,10(3),362-377。  延伸查詢new window
12.Calabresi, Guido、Melamed, A. Douglas(1972)。Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral。Harvard Law Review,85(6),1089-1128。  new window
13.陳新民(1986)。憲法財產權保障之體系與「公益徵收」之概念。政大法學評論,33,193-231。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.溫豐文(1982)。論土地財產權之限制。東海學報,23,59-68。  延伸查詢new window
15.Fischel, W. A.(1979)。Equity and Efficiency Aspects of Zoning Reform。Public Policy,27(3),301-331。  new window
16.Friedland, C.(1993)。On Stigler and Stiglerism。Journal of Political Economy,101(5),780-793。  new window
17.Goetz, Michael L.、Wofford, Larry E.(1979)。The Motivation for Zoning: Efficiency or Wealth Redistribution?。Land Economics,55(4),472-485。  new window
18.Migue, J. L.、Belanger, G.(1974)。Towards a general theory of marginal discretion。Public Choice,17(1),24-43。  new window
19.Siegan, B. H.(1990)。Land Use Regulations Should Preserve Only Vital and Pressing Governmental Interests。Cato Journal,10(1),127-158。  new window
20.Strange, W. C.(1995)。Information, Holdouts, and Land Assembly。Journal of Urban Economics,38(3),317-332。  new window
會議論文
1.Hsiao, Hsin-Huang Michael、Liu, Hwa-Jen(1997)。Collective Action Toward a Sustainable City: Citizens’ Movements and Environmental Politics in Taipei。The International Symposium of Sustainability, Livelihood and Degradation in the Third World Cities,(會議日期: 1997/12/05-12/07)。  new window
研究報告
1.楊松齡(1996)。土地使用變更利益回饋制度之研究。臺北:行政院經濟建設委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳美智(1994)。地方財政之國家與地方菁英影響力的運作機制--臺中市的個案研究(碩士論文)。東海大學,臺中。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊志恆(1986)。約翰.洛爾斯正義理論之初探(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.周佳音(1994)。臺灣地區土地使用變更利得及其分配模式之研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
4.呂宗麟(1997)。政治權利與政治正義之研究,0。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林森田(1993)。都會地區農地變更使用制度之研究。行政院農業委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Barzel, Yoram(1989)。Economic Analysis of Property Rights。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Buchanan, James M.、Tullock, Gordon(1962)。The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundation of Constitutional Democracy。University of Michigan Press。  new window
4.Siegan, Barton H.(1972)。Land Use without Zoning。Lexington, Massachusetts:Heath-Lexington。  new window
5.李鴻毅(1996)。土地政策論。臺北:中國地政研究所。  延伸查詢new window
6.North, Douglass C.、劉瑞華(1990)。制度、制度變遷與經濟成就。臺北:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
7.Blais, André、Dion, Stéphane(1991)。The Budget-Maximizing Bureaucrat: Appraisals and Evidence。Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania:University of Pittsburgh Press。  new window
8.North, Douglass C.、劉瑞華(1995)。經濟史的結構與變遷。臺北:時報文化出版企業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.Castells, Manuel(1983)。The City and the Grassroots: A Cross-Cultural Theory of Urban Social Movements。Berkeley, CA:University of California Press。  new window
10.約翰.羅爾斯、何懷宏、何包鋼、廖申白(1988)。正義論。北京:中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.Posner, R. A.(1986)。Economic Analysis of Law。Boston, MA:Little, Brown & Company。  new window
12.蕭全政(19940000)。政治與經濟的整合:政治經濟學的基礎理論。臺北:桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Nozick, Robert(1974)。Anarchy, State and Utopia。Blackwell。  new window
14.陳志龍(19900000)。法益與刑事立法。臺北:陳志龍。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.陳東升(19950000)。金權城市:地方派系、財團與臺北都會發展的社會學分析。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Coase, Ronald Harry(1988)。The Firm, The Market, and The Law。University of Chicago Press。  new window
17.Niskanen, William A. Jr.(1971)。Bureaucracy and Representative Government。Chicago, IL:Aldine-Atherton。  new window
18.Furuboton, E. G.、Pejovich, S.(1974)。The Economics of Property Rights。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Ballinger Publishing Company。  new window
19.Tietenberg, T.(1992)。Environmental and Natural Resource Economics。Environmental and Natural Resource Economics。沒有紀錄。  new window
20.蘇志超(1994)。土地政策之比較研究。臺北:文笙書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Fischel, W. A.(1987)。The Economic of Zoning Laws。The John Hopkins University Press。  new window
22.James, F.、Gale, D.(1977)。Zoning for Sale: Transferable Development Rights。Zoning for Sale: Transferable Development Rights。Washington, DC。  new window
23.Lindblom, C. E.(1968)。政策制定過程。政策制定過程。Englewood Cliffs, NJ。  延伸查詢new window
24.Mercuro, N.、Ryan, T. P.(1984)。Law, Economics, and Public Policy。Law, Economics, and Public Policy。Greenwich, CT。  new window
25.Mises, L. E.(1963)。人的行為。人的行為。Chicago, IL。  延伸查詢new window
26.Nelson, R. H.(1977)。Zoning and Property Rights。Zoning and Property Rights。Cambridge。  new window
27.Stigler, G. J.(1975)。人民與國家-管制經濟論文集。人民與國家-管制經濟論文集。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE