臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：你贊成或反對立場對立者的論點？--立場對立情境之論點贊否模式(CSAAM)
書刊名：中華心理學刊
作者：劉政宏 引用關係／張文哲／陳學志 引用關係／黃博聖 引用關係
作者(外文)：Liu, Cheng-hong／Chang, Wen-jer／Chen, Hsueh-chih／Huang, Po-sheng
出版日期：2008
卷期：50:3
頁次：頁327-346
主題關鍵詞：立場對立情境之論點贊否模式；自動化處理；意識處理；論點立場；論點品質；Arguments agreement/disagreement model of a counterpositional situation；CSAAM；Argument position；Argument quality；Automatic processing；Consious processing
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:84
本研究提出「立場對立情境之論點贊否模式」(CSAAM)，來探討「人們會贊成或反對立場對立者所提出論點」的相關問題。CSAAM認為有兩條路徑會同時影響個體贊成或反對所接收的論點：第一條路徑中，若對立者提出的論點「與個體自身立場一致」或「有道理」，較會引發贊成傾向，反之較會引發反對傾向，而此條路徑屬於較意識層面的處理。第二條路徑中，立場對立訊息會經由反感情緒，引發個體對對立者的反對傾向，而此條路徑屬於較自動化的處理。本研究設計三個實驗來對CSAAM進行檢驗。實驗一以48名高中生為參與者，結果發現立場對立訊息會透過反感情緒引發個體的反對傾向，影響個體對對立者相片的贊否反應。實驗二以48名高中生為參與者，結果發現立場對立訊息的影響會減弱意識處理的影響，支持此種影響屬於較自動化的處理。實驗三以32名高中生為參與者，結果發現論點立場與品質等兩類論點性質均會影響論點贊否反應，且此種影響會與立場對立訊息的自動化影響並存。三個實驗結果大致支持了CSAAM。
This study proposed an Arguments Agreement/Disagreement Model of a Counterpositional Situation (CSAAM) to clarify whether people would agree with the arguments of counterpositional communicators? The CSAAM argues that when people make agreement/disagreement judgments about a counterpositional communicator's arguments, the responses would be influenced through two routes simultaneously. The first route is a more conscious process. In this route, when the counterpositional communicator's arguments are propositional or strong, an agreement tendency would be elicited. On the contrary, a disagreement tendency would be elicited. The second route is a more automatic process. In this route, the counterpositional message could directly elicit disagreement tendency through emotional reactance. The CSAAM was tested by 3 experiments. Experiment 1 taking 48 high school students as subjects demonstrated that counterpositional message could elicit reactance and a disagreement tendency, and thus influenced agreement/disagreement responses on the communicator's photo. Experiment 2 taking 48 high school students as subjects further supported the influence of counterpositional message is a more automatic one by showing the understanding of counterposition per se could attenuate the influence from conscious processing. Experiment 3 taking 32 high school students as subjects showed argument position and quality could influence argument agreement/disagreement responses, and the influences would co-occur with the automatic influence of counterpositional message. In conclusion, the concepts of CSAAM were generally supported.
期刊論文
1.Zuwerink, J. R.、Devine, P. G.(1996)。Attitude Importance and Resistance to Persuasion: It's not Just the thought that Counts。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，70(5)，931-944。  new window
2.Meyers-Levy, J.、Maheswaran, D.(2004)。Exploring message framing outcomes when systematic, heuristic or both types of processing occur。Journal of Consumer Psychology，14(1/2)，159-167。  new window
3.Fein, S.、Spencer, S. J.(1997)。Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，73，31-44。  new window
4.Petty, R. E.、Cacioppo, J. T.(1979)。Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，37(10)，1915-1926。  new window
5.Baron, R. M.、Kenny, D. A.(198612)。The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，51(6)，1173-1182。  new window
6.Jones, S. C.(1973)。Self- and interpersonal evaluations: Esteem theories versus consistency theories。Psychological Bulletin，79(3)，185-199。  new window
7.Zajonc, R. Bob(1980)。Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Inferences。American Psychologist，35(2)，151-175。  new window
8.陳友琦、孫蒨如(19990300)。心情、訊息架構與論點品質對說服效果的影響。應用心理學報，7，41-55。  延伸查詢new window
9.Simon, Herbert A.(1955)。A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice。The Quarterly Journal of Economics，69(1)，99-118。  new window
10.Chaiken, Shelly(1980)。Heuristic versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source versus Message Cues in Persuasion。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，39(5)，752-766。  new window
11.Chaiken, Shelly、Maheswaran, Durairaj(1994)。Heuristic Processing Can Bias Systematic Processing: Effects of Source Credibility, Argument Ambiguity, and Task Importance on Attitude Judgment。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，66(3)，460-473。  new window
12.Covington, Martin V.(1984)。The self-worth theory of achievement motivation: Findings and implications。The Elementary School Journal，85(1)，4-20。  new window
13.Wood, W.、Kallgren, C. A.、Preisler, R. M.(1985)。Access to Attitude-relevant Information in Memory as a Determinant of Persuasion: The Role of Message Attributes。Journal of Experimental Social Psychology，21，73-85。  new window
14.Reeder, G. D.、Pryor, J. B.、Wohl, M. J. A.、Griswell, M. L.(2005)。On Attributing Negative Motives to Others Who Disagree with Our Opinions。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin，31，1498-1510。  new window
15.Dunning, D.、Leuenberger, A.、Sherman, D. A.(1995)。A New Look at Motivated Inference: Are Self-serving Theories of Success a Product of Motivational Forces?。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，69，58-68。  new window
16.Kruglanski, A. W.(1975)。The Endogenous-exogenous Partition in Attribution Theory。Psychological Review，82，387-406。  new window
17.Albarracín, D.、Kumkale, G. T.(2003)。Affect as Information in Persuasion: A Model of Affect Identification and Discounting。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，84，453-469。  new window
18.Petty, R. E.、Cacioppo, J. T.(1990)。Involvement and Persuasion: Tradition versus Intergration。Psychological Bulletin，107，367-374。  new window
圖書
1.Perloff, R. M.(2003)。The dynamics of persuaion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st century。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
2.Kunda, Ziva(1999)。Social cognition: making sense of people。Cambridge, Massachusetts：MIT Press。  new window
3.Brehm, Jack W.(1966)。A Theory of Psychological Reactance。Academic Press。  new window
4.Petty, R. E.、Cacioppo, J. T.(1996)。Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches。Westview Press。  new window
5.LeDoux, J. E.(1996)。The emotional; brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life。New York：Phoenix：Simon & Schuster。  new window
6.Peplau, L. A.、Taylor, S. E.、Sears, D. O.(1997)。Social psychology。Prentice-Hall。  new window
7.Heider, Fritz(1958)。The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
8.Stiff, J. B.、Mongeau, P. A.(2003)。Persuasive communication。New York：Guilford Press。  new window
9.Brehm, Sharon S.、Brehm, Jack W.(1981)。Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control。Academic Press。  new window
10.Aronson, E.、Wilson, T. D.、Akert, R. M.(1994)。Social Psychology: The Heart and the Mind。HarperCollins。  new window
11.Petty, Richard E.、Cacioppo, John T.(1986)。Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Route to Attitude Change。New York：Springer-Verlag。  new window
12.O'Keefe, D. J.(2003)。Persuasion: Theory and Research。Persuasion: Theory and Research。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
13.Gass, R. H.、Seiter, J. S.(1999)。Persuasion, Social Influence, and Compliance Gaining。Persuasion, Social Influence, and Compliance Gaining。Needham Heights, MA。  new window
14.Covington, M. V.(1983)。Motivated Cognition。Learning and Motivation in the Classroom。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
15.Jack, J. Z.、O'Brien, M. E.(2003)。Decreasing Resistance by Affirming the Self。Resistance and Persuasion。Mahwah, NJ。  new window
16.Quinn, J. M.、Wood, W.(2003)。Forewarnings of Influence Appeals: Inducing Resistance and Acceptance。Resistance and Persuasion。Mahwah, NJ。  new window
17.Knowles, E. S.、Linn, J. A.(2003)。The Important of Resistance to Persuasion。Resistance and Persuasion。Mahwah, NJ。  new window
18.Ross, L.、Ward, A.(1996)。Naïve Realism in Everyday Life: Implications for Social Conflict and Misunderstanding。Values and Knowledge。Mahwah, NJ。  new window
19.Pennington, D. C.(2000)。Social Cognition。Social Cognition。London, UK。  new window
20.Carter, R. F.、Ruggels, W. L.、Jackson, K. M.、Heffner, M. B.(1970)。Application of Signaled Stopping Technique to Communication Research。New Models for Mass Communication Research。Beverly Hills, CA。  new window
21.Simons, H. W.、Morreale, J.、Gronbeck, B.(2001)。Persuasion in Society。Thousand Oaks, California：Sage。  new window
圖書論文
1.Wegener, Duane T.、Petty, Richard E.、Smoak, Natalie D.、Fabrigar, Leandre R.(2004)。Multiple routes to resisting attitude change。Resistance and persuasion。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.Burgoon, M.、Alvaro, E.、Grandpre, J.、Voulodakis, M.(2002)。Revisiting the Theory of Psychological Reactance: Communicating Threats to Attitudinal Freedom。The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice。Thousand Oaks, California：Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：993（臺灣：974，外國：19） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1780212 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67591935
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上