臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：論點立場與品質對高中生論點贊否反應影響的意識處理機制
書刊名：教育心理學報
作者：劉政宏 引用關係／陳學志 引用關係／張文哲／張仁和 引用關係
作者(外文)：Liu, Cheng-hong／Chen, Hsueh-chih／Chang, Wen-jer／Chang, Jen-ho
出版日期：2011
卷期：42:3
頁次：頁491-515
主題關鍵詞：立場對立情境之論點贊否模式；自動化處理；意識處理；論點立場；論點品質；CSAAM；Arguments agreement/disagreement model of a counterpositional situation；Argument position；Argument quality；Automatic processing；Conscious processing
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:39
在日常生活或教育情境中，人們常常會對接觸到的論點進行贊成或反對的判斷，以往有許多研究在針對與此議題相關的溝通現象進行探討。先前的研究顯示，論點立場與品質是影響個體對論點做出贊成或反對判斷的主要因素（若論點與個體自身立場一致或有道理，會引發贊成傾向），然而卻甚少有研究針對「論點立場與品質對論點贊否判斷的影響屬於意識或自動化處理？」的問題進行深入探討。因此，本研究試圖由「能否覺察？」、「能否控制？」及「所需認知資源多寡？」等三種區分意識與自動化處理的指標，針對論點立場與品質兩種論點性質影響路徑的意識或自動化處理本質進行檢驗。實驗一以64名高中生爲對象，發現參與者可以覺察到自己對論點的贊否判斷會受到論點立場的影響，而且在實驗者對其進行監控提醒後（提醒其要公正客觀地進行判斷），也能夠修正依據論點立場進行判斷的傾向；然而，參與者雖然可以覺察到自己的判斷會受到論點品質的影響，但在經過監控提醒後，並未能提升其依據論點品質進行判斷的傾向。實驗二在調整實驗一的方法後，在73名高中生的研究結果中發現論點立場與品質的影響分別會被監控提醒所修正或促進。實驗三以96名高中生爲對象，顯示參與者可覺察論點立場與品質的影響，且此影響也會被分心作業所干擾。整體而言，多數結果支持論點立場與品質的影響屬於意識處理，本研究據此進行討論，並提出結果應用及未來研究建議。
People often make "agree or disagree" judgments on arguments in daily life and education settings. Researches have been exploring the communication phenomena relating to this topic and several studies indicated that the position and quality of an argument would influence whether people agree with it (when an argument is compatible with prior beliefs or strong in quality, tendency to agree it is elicited), but very few has examined the conscious/automatic essences of the processing routes this study aimed to examine. Sixty-four high school students were involved in Experiment 1 and it was founded that the influence of argument position on judgments was conscious processing as the participants were aware of such influence, and it could also be corrected by instructions which reminded the participants to monitor the judgments objectively (monitor reminding). However, although the participants were also aware of the influence of argument quality on their judgments, the results did not show facilitating effect of monitor reminding. After revising the procedures of Experiment 1, the Experiment 2 with 73 high school students found that the influences of argument quality and position could be respectively corrected or facilitated by monitor reminding. The results of Experiment 3 with 96 high school participants indicate that both influences of argument position and argument quality were conscious processing inasmuch as the influences were interfered by distraction task and the participants were aware of the influences. Based on the research findings, possible implications for educators and suggestions for future research are provided.
期刊論文
1.Zuwerink, J. R.、Devine, P. G.(1996)。Attitude Importance and Resistance to Persuasion: It's not Just the thought that Counts。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，70(5)，931-944。  new window
2.Edwards, Kari、Smith, E. E.(1996)。A Disconfirmation Bias in the Evaluation of Arguments。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，71(1)，5-24。  new window
3.劉政宏、張文哲、陳學志、黃博聖(20080900)。你贊成或反對立場對立者的論點？--立場對立情境之論點贊否模式（CSAAM）。中華心理學刊，50(3)，327-346。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Shiffin, R. M.、Schneider, W.(1977)。Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: I. Detection, Search and Attention。Psychological Review，84(1)，1-199。  new window
5.Ditto, Peter H.、Lopez, David F.(1992)。Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，63(4)，568-584。  new window
6.Chaiken, Shelly、Maheswaran, Durairaj(1994)。Heuristic Processing Can Bias Systematic Processing: Effects of Source Credibility, Argument Ambiguity, and Task Importance on Attitude Judgment。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，66(3)，460-473。  new window
7.Lord, Charles G.、Ross, Lee、Lepper, Mark R.(1979)。Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，37(11)，2098-2109。  new window
8.Buller, D. B.(1986)。Distraction during persuasive communication: A meta-analytic review。Communication Monographs，53，91-114。  new window
9.Clark, J. K.、Wegener, D. T.、Fabrigar, L. R.(2008)。Attitudinal ambivalence and message-based persuasion。Motivated processing of proattitudinal information and avoidance of counterattitudinal information，34，565-577。  new window
10.Crano, W. D.、Prislin, R.(2006)。Attitude and persuasion。Annual Review of Psychology，57，345-374。  new window
11.Festinger, L.、Maccoby, N.(1964)。On resistance to persuasive communication。Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology，68，359-366。  new window
12.Haaland, G. A.、Venkatesan, M.(1968)。Resistance to persuasive communications: An examination of the distraction hypothesis。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，9，167-170。  new window
13.Stanovich, K. E.、West, R. F.(1997)。Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking。Journal of Educational Psychology，89，343-357。  new window
14.Stanovich, K. E.、West, R. F.(1998)。Individual differences in rational thought。Jounal of Experimental Psychology，127，161-188。  new window
15.Tobin, S. J.、Weary, G.(2003)。An on-line look at automatic contrast and correction of behavior categorization and dispositional inferences。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin，29，1328-1338。  new window
16.Van Overwalle, F.、Siebler, F.(2005)。A connectionist model of attitude formation and change。Personality and Social Psychology Review，9，231-274。  new window
17.Vohs, J. L.、Garrett, R. L.(1968)。Resistance to persuasion: An integrative framework。Public Opinion Quarterly，32，445-452。  new window
18.Wood, W.、Kallgren, C. A.、Preisler, R. M.(1985)。Access to attitude-relevant information in memory as a determinant of persuasion: The role of message attributes。Journal of Experimental Social Psychology，21，73-85。  new window
圖書
1.Reardon, K. K.(1991)。Persuasion in practice。Newbury Park, California：Sage。  new window
2.Bless, Herbert, Klaus Fiedler and Fritz Strack(2004)。Social Cognition: How Individuals Construct Social Reality。New York, NY：Psychology Press。  new window
3.Bohner, G.、Wanke, M.(2002)。Attitudes and attitude change。Hove, UK：Psychology Press。  new window
4.Kunda, Ziva(1999)。Social cognition: making sense of people。Cambridge, Massachusetts：MIT Press。  new window
5.Cohen, J.(1988)。Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
6.Stiff, J. B.、Mongeau, P. A.(2003)。Persuasive communication。New York：Guilford Press。  new window
7.Petty, Richard E.、Cacioppo, John T.(1981)。Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches。William C. Brown。  new window
8.Petty, Richard E.、Cacioppo, John T.(1986)。Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Route to Attitude Change。New York：Springer-Verlag。  new window
9.Ashcraft, M. H.(2002)。Cognition。Upper Saddle River, NJ。  new window
10.Kirk, R. E.(1982)。Experimental Design。Monterey, Calif。  new window
11.Carter, R. F.、Simpson, R.(1970)。Unpublished data cited。New models for mass communication research。Beverly Hills, CA。  new window
12.Petty, R. E.、Brock, T. C.(1981)。Thought disruption and persuasion: Assessing the validity of attitude change experiments。Cognitive responses in persuasion。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫修訂課程綱要，台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Chaiken, S.、Liberman, A.、Eagly, A. H.(1989)。Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context。Unintended thought。New York, NY：Guilford Press。  new window
2.Gilbert, D. T.(1989)。Thinking Lightly about Others: Automatic Components of the Social Inference Process。Unintended Thought。New York, NY：Guilford Press。  new window
3.Posner, M. I.、Snyder, C. R. R.(1975)。Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals。Attention and performance。Academic Press。  new window
4.Petty, R. E.、Wegener, D. T.(1999)。The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Current Status and Controversies。Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology。New York, NY：Guilford Press。  new window
5.Chen, S.、Chaiken, S.(1999)。The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context。Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology。New York：Guilford Press。  new window
6.Bohner, G.、Erb, H. P.、Siebler, F.(2008)。Information processing approaches to persuasion integrating assumptions from the dual- and single-processing perspectives。Attitudes and attitude change。New York, NY：Psychology Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1003（臺灣：1000，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1885225 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67681194
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上