:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論兩岸旅遊糾紛之刑事訴訟障礙
書刊名:法令月刊
作者:張明偉 引用關係
出版日期:2009
卷期:60:6
頁次:頁106-135
主題關鍵詞:傳聞法則旅遊糾紛刑事訴訟法
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:32
  • 點閱點閱:14
期刊論文
1.三井誠、陳運財(19990100)。起訴狀一本主義與傳聞法則。律師雜誌,232,73-83。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳巡龍(20050600)。對質詰問權合憲限制與違憲限制的分際--評最高法院九四年臺上字第八一二號判決。臺灣本土法學雜誌,71,253-261。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳巡龍(20041200)。對質詰問權的保障與限制--釋字第五八二號解釋評析。月旦法學,115,97-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林永謀(20031203)。傳聞證據。司法周刊,1162,2。  延伸查詢new window
5.朱石炎(19921000)。兩岸人民關係條例刑事章釋義。法令月刊,43(10),16-18。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Amar, Akhil Reed、Marcus, Jonathan L.(1995)。Double Jeopardy Law After Rodney King。Columbia Law Review,95(1),2-3。  new window
7.王兆鵬(19990800)。當事人進行主義爭辯之評議。刑事法雜誌,43(4),32-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Jonakait, Randolph N.(1995)。The Origins of the Confrontation Clause: An Alternative History。Rutgers Law Journal,27(1),77-109。  new window
9.Amar, Akhil Reed(1992)。The Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment。The Yale Law Journal,101,1193+1206。  new window
10.Amar, Akhil Reed(1994)。Fourth Amendment Principles。Harvard Law Review,107,757+773。  new window
11.(1968)。Note, Confrontation, Cross-Examination, and the Right to Prepare a Defense。Georgetown Law Journal,56,939-940。  new window
12.Wesson, Charles R.(1995)。Constitutional Hearsay: Requiring Fundamental Testing and Corroboration Under the Confrontation Clause。Virginia Law Review,82,149+151-152。  new window
13.Graham, Kenneth J.(1972)。The Right to Confrontation and the Hearsay Rule: Sir Walter Raleigh Loses Another One。Criminal Law Bulletin,8,99-100。  new window
14.Lilly, Graham C.(1984)。Notes on the Confrontation Clause and Ohio v. Roberts。University of Florida Law Review,36,207-209。  new window
15.周成瑜(20050300)。兩岸海上犯罪問題與對策。軍法專刊,51(3),1-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.俞叔平(1956)。刑事訴訟法學。中國法學編譯社。  延伸查詢new window
2.張麗卿(2002)。刑事訴訟法理論與運用。五南圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃東熊、吳景芳(2002)。刑事訴訟法論。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳樸生(1994)。刑事訴訟法爭議問題研究。五南圖書出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Fenner, G. Michael(2003)。The Hearsay Rule。Carolina Academic Press。  new window
6.Klotter, John C.(1992)。Criminal Evidence。Ohio Anderson Publishing。  new window
7.Thayer, James Bradley(1898)。A Preliminary Treatise on Evidence at the Common Law。Boston, Massachusetts:Little Brown。  new window
8.Mueller, Christopher B.(2000)。Evidence Under the Rules。New York:Aspen Law & Business。  new window
9.Best, Auihur(2001)。Evidence。New York:Aspen Law & Business。  new window
其他
1.朱蓓蕾。兩岸共同打擊犯罪之議題與建議,http://www.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/IA/094/IA-R-094-002.htm。  延伸查詢new window
2.別再叫我買!看大陸遊客在臺灣的悲慘遭遇,http://www.haoo.cnyhtml/article/2006/08/10/2322161.html。  延伸查詢new window
3.司法院大法官釋字第二七一號解釋中,吳庚前大法宮所提之不同意見書,http://www.judicial.gov.fw/constitutionalcourt/P03_01_detail.aspexpno=271&showtype=%B7N%A8%A3%AE%Dl。  延伸查詢new window
4.林明德。談建議刑事基本人權入憲之必要性,http://www.president.gov.tw/l_structure/famous/column/7_lmd20040501.html。  延伸查詢new window
5.FindLaw。Confrontation,http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment06/08.html。  new window
圖書論文
1.王兆鵬(1999)。對質詰問權與強制取證權。刑事被告的憲法權利。翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE