:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:運用平衡計分卡與資料包絡分析法於IC封測產業績效評估
書刊名:商業現代化學刊
作者:戴貞德梁傑盛
作者(外文):Day, Jen-derLiang, Jie-sheng
出版日期:2009
卷期:5:1
頁次:頁135-150
主題關鍵詞:平衡計分卡資料包絡分析法IC封測產業Balanced scorecardData envelopment analysisIC package and testing industry
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:62
本文之研究目的係運用平衡計分卡四個主要構面的概念來選取績效評估指標,並使用資料包絡分析法作爲效率衡量之工具。所選定之指標分別爲:普通股股數、行銷費用、營業成本、研發費用、員工費用、營業收入與稅前淨利。研究結果發現:在遞延時間分析上,領先指標(非財務構面)在所選取的兩個年度裡有明顯地反映到落後指標(財務構面)上。在效率衡量方面,有88%的受評單位均能達到相對良好的營運績效。在差額變數方面,分別有58%與70%的受評單位在行銷費用與稅前淨利上需要加以改善。在敏感度方面,以營業成本與營業收入的變動對各受評單位效率值的影響最爲顯著。
In this paper, we chose four major dimensions of balanced scorecard as indicators to do the performance evaluation. Then the data envelopment analysis method was used to measure the efficiency. The indicators included: Number of common stock, marketing expenses, operating costs, research and development expenses, employee expenses, operating revenue, and pre-tax income. The results indicated that: for the lag time analysis of selected two years data, the leading indicators (non-financial aspect) had obviously reflected to the behind indicators (financial aspect). For the efficient evaluation, 84% of units could reach relatively good operation efficiency. For the slack variable analysis, 58% and 70% of units needed to improve its marketing expenses and pre-tax income. For the sensitivity analysis, the change of operating costs and operating revenues were the most obvious indicators that affected the evaluated units.
期刊論文
1.Rickards, R. C.(2003)。Setting Benchmarks and Evaluating Balanced Scorecards with Data Envelopment Analysis。Benchmarking: An International Journal,10(3),226-245。  new window
2.Wang, J. C.(2006)。Corporate Performance Efficiency Investigated by Data Envelopment Analysis and Balanced Scorecard。Journal of American Academy of Business,9(2),312-318。  new window
3.Chow, C. W.、Haddad, K. M.、Williamson, J. E.(1997)。Applying the Balanced Scorecard to Small Companies。Management Accounting,79(2),21-27。  new window
4.Banker, Rajiv D.、Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William Wager(1984)。Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis。Management Science,30(9),1078-1092。  new window
5.Farrell, Michael James(1957)。The Measurement of Productive Efficiency。Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General),120(3),253-290。  new window
6.Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William W.、Rhodes, Edwardo(1978)。Measuring the efficiency of decision making units。European Journal of Operational Research,2(6),429-444。  new window
7.Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.(1992)。The Balanced Scorecard: Measures That Drive Performance。Harvard Business Review,70(1),71-79。  new window
8.Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.(1996)。Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system。Harvard Business Review,74(1),75-85。  new window
學位論文
1.譚雯華(2002)。以策略觀點探討新舊銀行之經營效率--結合平衡計分卡及資料包絡分析法(碩士論文)。國防管理學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝哲明(2006)。半導體封測廠經營效率之研究(碩士論文)。義守大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃國晉(2006)。資料包絡與麥氏分析法之應用--以國內半導體產業為例(碩士論文)。長庚大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.林政賢(2003)。臺灣半導體產業經營績效影響之研究(碩士論文)。立德管理學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃筱潔(2004)。台灣半導體產業生產效率之實證研究--以資料包絡模式分析(碩士論文)。世新大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hilton, R. W.、Maher, M.、Selto, F. H.(2000)。Cost Management: Strategies for Business Decisions。McGraw-Hill Companies。  new window
2.Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.、陳正平(2004)。策略地圖:串連組織策略從形成到徹底實施的動態管理工具。臺北:臉譜。  延伸查詢new window
3.孫遜(2004)。資料包絡分析法:理論與應用。揚智文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Lovell, C. A. K.(1993)。Production Frontiers and Productive Efficiency。The Measurement of Productive Efficiency--techniques and applications。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE