:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣地區資訊組織文獻書目計量分析
書刊名:圖書資訊學刊
作者:林巧敏 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Chiao-min
出版日期:2009
卷期:7:1/2
頁次:頁101-123
主題關鍵詞:書目計量資訊組織分類編目文獻成長布拉德福定律BibliometricsInformation organizationClassification and catalogingLiterature growthBradford's law
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:19
  • 點閱點閱:50
本文旨在利用書目計量方法,蒐集臺灣地區民國71至97年資訊組織期刊文獻610篇與民國60至97年資訊組織學位論文113篇,分析文獻的數量成長、主題分布、第一作者特性、期刊分布與著作機構分布等特性,研究發現:除民國92年開始期刊文獻略微下滑外,資訊組織期刊與學位論文數量大致符合逐年成長;期刊文獻研究主題以分類理論或記述編目問題為主、學位論文以探討知識組織為多數;期刊文獻數量分布並不符合布拉德福定律;期刊文獻作者合著比例偏低,但有合著增加趨勢;刊載資訊組織研究相關文獻首要的期刊是《教育資料與圖書館學》;資訊組織學位論文授與學校以臺灣大學最多,且各校研究主題重點各有特長。
The purpose of this study is to explore the characteristics of the literature on information organization in Taiwan. A total of 610 articles from 1882 to 2008 and 113 theses and dissertations from 1971 to 2008 were identified and analyzed. The growth of literature, research subjects, author productivity, the distribution of journals and organizations are addressed. The results of this study reveal that the journal articles in Taiwan had been up-growing except after 2003, but the theses and dissertations had been growing stably. The major research subject of journal articles is classification theory and descriptive cataloging, but the theses and dissertations are knowledge organization. The zone analysis from Bradford’s law is not applicable to journal productivity. Productivity is mainly focused on single author and toward coauthor. The Journal of Educational Media and Library Sciences is the major journal that publishes information organization articles. The National Taiwan University is the most productive schools of theses and dissertations, but various schools have their characteristics of research subjects.
期刊論文
1.Atkins, Stephen E.(1988)。Subject Trends in Library and Information Science Research, 1975-1984。Library Trends,36,633-658。  new window
2.Narin, F.、Olivastro, D.、Stevens, K. A.(1994)。Bibliometrics theory, practice and problems。Evaluation Review,18(1),65-76。  new window
3.蔡明月(19971200)。文獻成長現象。中國圖書館學會會報,59,135-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡明月、洪世芳(20020300)。OPAC文獻之書目計量學研究。大學圖書館,6(1),15-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王梅玲(20070400)。臺灣資訊組織與Metadata教育之研究。圖書館學與資訊科學,33(1),103-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.歐陽崇榮、關中、童瓊慧、薛志峰(20060600)。從期刊及博碩士論文分析探討臺灣圖書資訊學之研究。教育資料與圖書館學,43(4),389-411。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.蔡明月、方碧玲(20061200)。資訊素養文獻之書目計量研究。教育資料與圖書館學,44(2),133-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.蔡明月、劉瓊芳(20070500)。1992-2005資訊計量學研究及其發展演變。圖書與資訊學刊,61,42-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Gragg, W. Lee II.、Havener, W. Michael、Kester, Diane D.、Feehan, Patricia E.(1987)。Library and Information Science Research: An Analysis of the 1984 Journal Literature。LISR,9(3),173-185。  new window
10.尤慧敏(2001)。索引與摘要文獻書目計量學研究。中華民國圖書館學會會報,67,121-138。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.陳亞寧、陳淑君(2005)。Metadata在圖書資訊學的研究發展。圖書與資訊學刊,55,51-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Davis, Mari、Wilson, C. S.、Horn, A.(2005)。Informing Decision-Making in Libraries: Informetric Research as Input to LIS Education and Practice。Australian Academic and Research Libraries,36(4),195-214。  new window
13.Olsgaard, John N.、Olsgaard, J. K.(1980)。Authorship in five library periodicals。College and Research Libraries,41,49-53。  new window
14.Schlachter, Gail A.、Thomison, D.(1974)。The Library Science Doctorate: A Quantitative Analysis of Dissertations and Recipients。Journal of Education for Librarianship,15,95-111。  new window
研究報告
1.吳明德(1997)。分類編目教材編纂計畫研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳和琴、張慧銖、江綉瑛、陳昭珍(2003)。資訊組織。臺北:國立空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE