臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：廣電新聞訪問者之不同閱聽人想像：論述心理學之觀點
書刊名：新聞學研究
作者：江靜之 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chiang, Chin-chih
出版日期：2010
卷期：102
頁次：頁35-72
主題關鍵詞：論述心理學；廣電新聞訪問；閱聽人；論述；語藝策略；Discursive psychology；Broadcast news interview；Audience；Discourse；Rhetorical strategy
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:46
本文採論述心理學觀點探究廣電新聞訪問者如何在談話中使用語言建立不同「閱聽人」版本，以及如何將「閱聽人」當成論述資源以進行自我定位，進而正當化自己所為並歸屬責任。本文分析十位廣電新聞訪問者之訪談資料，發現廣電新聞訪問者透過模糊、條列和對比等論述技巧將閱聽人形塑成事實，以此解釋自己的訪問設計及表現。而同樣將閱聽人描繪成各元意見，訪問者既可藉此樹立中立形象，也能突顯自己是獨立且可自我決策的新聞工作者。此外，在某些閱聽人論述上，訪問者也會運用「事先打預防針」及「坦白立場」等語藝策略避免可能來自研究者的批評及挑戰。
Adopting the perspective from the discursive psychology, this study examines how broadcast news interviewers construct various versions of audiences, and how they use the audience as a discursive resource to deal with the dilemmas of stake in research interviews. Based on the researcher’s in-depth interviews with ten senior anchors, this study explored how the anchors described the audience as factual notions with discursive techniques, such as systematic vagueness, lists and contrasts. In addition, this study found that different notions of the audience were used by the anchors to justify their news interview designs and performances. As a discursive resource, the audience was used to establish the anchor’s neutral position as well as to emphasize the independence of a journalist. The anchors also used stake inoculation and stake confession to mitigate or to avoid the potential criticism and blame from the researcher.
期刊論文
1.Roth, A. L.(1998)。Who makes the news? Descriptions of television news interviewees' public personae。Media, Culture & Society，20，79-107。  new window
2.Beattie, G.、Doherty, K.(1995)。"I saw what reality happened" : The discursive construction of victims and perpetrators in firsthand accounts of paramilitary violence in Northern Ireland。Journal of Language and Social Psychology，14(4)，408-433。  new window
3.Clayman, S. E.(2002)。Tribune of the people: Maintaining the legitimacy of aggressive journalism。Media, Culture & Society，24，197-216。  new window
4.Costera Meijer, I.(2003)。What is quality television news? A plea for extending the professional repertoire of newsmakers。Journalism Studies，4(1)，15-29。  new window
5.Griffin, C.(2007)。Different visions: A rejoinder to Henwood, Potter and Hepburn。Discourse Studies，9(2)，283-287。  new window
6.Heikkilä, H.,、Kunelius, R.(2006)。Journalists imagining the European public sphere: professional discourses about the EU news practices in ten countries。Javnost，13(4)，63-80。  new window
7.Henwood, K.(2007)。Beyond hypercriticality: Taking forward methodological inquiry and debate in discursive and qualitative social psychology。Discourse Studies，9(2)，270-275。  new window
8.Hepburn, A.、Wiggins, S.(2005)。Developments in discursive psychology。Discourse & Society，16(5)，595-601。  new window
9.Heritage, J.,、Roth, A.(1995)。Grammar and institution: Questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview。Research on Language and Social Interaction，28 (1)，1-60。  new window
10.Potter, J.(2005)。Making psychology relevant。Discourse & Society，16(5)，739-747。  new window
11.Potter, J.(2000)。Post-cognitive psychology。Theory and Psychology，10(1)，31-37。  new window
12.Potter, J.(1996)。Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction。American Behavioral Scientist，36(3)，383-401。  new window
13.Speer, S. A.(2002)。What can conversation analysis contribute to feminist methodology? Putting reflexivity into practice。Discourse & Society，13(6)，783-803。  new window
14.Speer, S. A.,、Potter, J.(2000)。The management of heterosexist talk: Conversational resources and prejudiced claims。Discourse & Society，11(4)，543-572。  new window
15.Stubbe, M., Lane, C., Hilder, J., Vine, E., Vine, B., Marra, M., et al.(2003)。Multiple discourse analyses of a workplace interaction。Discourse Studies，5(3)，351-388。  new window
圖書
1.Hutchby, I.、Wooffitt, R.(1999)。Conversation Analysis: Principles, practices, and applications。Malden, MA：Polity Press。  new window
2.Wooffitt, R.(2005)。Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: A comparative and critical introduction。London：Sage。  new window
3.湯廷池(1992)。英語認知語法：結構、意義與功用。台北：台灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.Fairclough, N.(1995)。Media discourse。London：Edward Arnold。  new window
5.Phillips, Louise J.、Jørgensen, Marianne W.(2002)。Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method。Sage。  new window
6.Wood, Linda A.、Kroger, Rolf O.(2000)。Doing Discourse Analysis: Methods for Studying Action in Talk and Text。Sage Publications。  new window
7.Potter, J.、Wetherell, M.(1987)。Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour。London：Sage。  new window
8.Edwards, D.、Potter, J.(1992)。Discursive Psychology。London：Sage。  new window
9.馮小龍(1996)。《廣播新聞原理與製作》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
10.Schlesinger, P.(1978)。Putting “reality” together。London。  new window
圖書論文
1.Edwards, D.、Potter, J.(2005)。Discursive psychology, mental states and descriptions。Conversation and Cognition。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Edwards, D.、Potter, J.(2001)。Discursive psychology。How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods。Continuum。  new window
3.Heritage, J.(1985)。Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience。Handbook of Discourse。London：Academic Press。  new window
4.Heritage, J.、Watson, R.(1979)。Formulations as conversational objects。Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology。New York：Irvington。  new window
5.Horton-Salway, M.(2001)。The construction of M.E.: The discursive action model。Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis。London：Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：624（臺灣：608，外國：16） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1498098 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67308695
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上