:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:利用項目功能差異檢視澳門電子閱讀素養表現的優勢和弱勢
書刊名:課程與教學
作者:薛寶嫦
作者(外文):Sit, Pou-seong
出版日期:2010
卷期:13:2
頁次:頁215-235
主題關鍵詞:閱讀素養電子閱讀評量項目功能差異PISAReading literacyElectronic assessmentDifferential item functioning
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:49
電子閱讀評量(Electronic Reading Assessment,簡稱ERA)是「PISA 2009閱讀素養測試計劃」中一種新型的電腦化評核方式。本文利用學生在電子閱讀先導測試的答案,透過項目功能差異的分析方法檢視澳門十五歲學生於電子閱讀素養表現的優勢和弱勢。文中重點分析二十五個被鑑別出在澳門具有項目功能差異特徵的ERA測試項目,以檢視學生在以下兩個方面的作答優勢和弱勢:(1)項目類型(多項選擇題、提供答案題);(2)閱讀層面(使用和提取、綜合和詮釋、反思和評估)。礙於試題和測試成績的保密原則,筆者不能洩露項目內容和各國在先導測試各個項目所取得的成績,只能利用PISA研究總部在ERA先導測試後所公佈的項目,檢視其中內容,以具體說明澳門十五歲學生電子閱讀素養表現成就及其不足之處。
Electronic reading assessment (ERA) is a new form of international assessment in the PISA 2009 Reading Literacy Study. Using students' online reading responses in the field trial, the present study examined Macao 15-year-old students' unexpected strengths and weaknesses through differential item functioning. Specifically, characteristics of ERA items identified as having country by item interactions were analyzed to throw light on the item format (multiple choice versus constructed response) and the reading aspects (i.e. access and retrieve, integrate and interpret, reflect and evaluate) that the students were good at and/or weak in. Through the use of released items after the field trial by the PISA Consortium, it is possible to examine item content so as to have a more concrete idea of Macao students' online Chinese reading capabilities and limitations.
期刊論文
1.Clauser, B. E.、Mazor, K. M.(1998)。Using statistical procedures to identify differentially functioning test items。Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice,17(1),31-44。  new window
2.張國祥、薛寶嫦(20081200)。Electronic Reading Assessment: The PISA Approach for the International Comparison of Reading Comprehension。教育研究與發展期刊,4(4),19-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Coiro, Julie、Dobler, Elizabeth(2007)。Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet。Reading Research Quarterly,42(2),214-257。  new window
4.Haladyna, T. M.、Downing, S. M.(2004)。Construct-irrelevant variance in high-stakes testing。Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice,23(1),17-27。  new window
5.Katz, I. R.(2007)。Testing information literacy in digital environments: ETS’s iSkills assessment。Information Technology and Libraries,26(3),3-12。  new window
6.Penfield, R. D.,、Lam, T. C. M.(2000)。Assessing differential item functioning in performance assessment。Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice,19(3),5-15。  new window
7.Yildirim, H. H.,、Berberoglu, G.(2009)。Judgmental and statistical DIF analyses of the PISA-2003 mathematics literacy items。International Journal of Testing,9(2),108-121。  new window
會議論文
1.OECD(2007)。PISA 2009 reading framework –23rd meeting of the PISA Governing Board, Oslo, 12-14 March, 2007。Paris。2007。  new window
2.Sit, P. S.,、Cheung, K. C.(2009)。An examination of the design and implementation logistics of electronic reading assessment in PISA 2009 study:The Macao experience。Kiel,Germany。  new window
研究報告
1.Shan, W. J., Ieong, S. L., Cheung, K. C., Zhang, C. L., Tian, Y., Wang. P. C., Vong,S.K., Tse, K. S., Leung, S. O.,、Sze, T. M.(2007)。An investigatory study of the non-high education curriculum and its direction for reform in Macao: Final report。Macao。  new window
學位論文
1.葉雅鏽(2008)。國中學生線上閱讀素養與策略調整特徵之探討,臺南。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Holland, P. W.、Wainer, H.(1993)。Differential item functioning。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlnaum。  new window
2.OECD(1999)。Measuring student knowledge and skills: A new framework for assessment。Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)。  new window
3.Camilli, G.、Shepard, L. A.(1994)。Methods for identifying biased test items。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
4.Bond, L., Moss, P.,、Carr, P.(1996)。Fairness in large-scale performance assessment。Technical issues in large-scale performance assessment。  new window
5.Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C.,、Leu, D.(2008)。The handbook of research on new literacies。UK。  new window
6.Rush, L. S., Eakle, A. J.,、Berger, A.(2007)。Secondary school literacy:What research reveals for classroom practice。Illinois, US。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top