:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:創意生活產業遊客滿意屬性矩陣之研究--以飛牛牧場爲例
書刊名:運動休閒餐旅研究
作者:鍾政偉 引用關係
作者(外文):Chung, Cheng-wei
出版日期:2011
卷期:6:1
頁次:頁66-78
主題關鍵詞:滿意屬性矩陣創意生活產業IPA分析法Satisfaction attribute matrixCreative life industryIPA analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:21
本研究在探討創意生活產業的遊客滿意屬性矩陣並以飛牛牧場爲取樣地點,依據創意生活產業的定義中延伸出本研究的滿意屬性矩陣構面包含:核心知識、深度體驗及高質美感。本研究共回收有效問卷347份,透過MANOVA分析、t檢定及IPA分析得出本研究結果。1.遊客個人屬性的差異對滿意矩陣的重視程度及滿意程度具有顯著差異。2.透過IPA分析法可發現飛牛牧場所提供的服務或產品中,並無落於高重視低滿意的(加強改善區),顯示其服務品質具有一定水準以上。3.從個人屬性與滿意屬性的分析內容,可以發現婚姻狀況、教育程度及職業具有深入討論的價值。
Being based on Flyingcow Ranch, the aim of the research is to discuss the customer-satisfaction attribute matrix of creative life industries. According to the definition of creative life industries, the customer-satisfaction attribute matrix can be extended into: the core knowledge, in-depth experiences and high quality aesthetics. There were 347 valid questionnaires responded. Through the analyses of MANOVA, t-test and IPA analysis, it is found: (1). The personal attribute differences shows significant differences from the importance and satisfaction of customer-satisfaction attribute matrix. (2). According to IPA, the services and the products from Flyingcow Ranch do not fall to the area where it is needed to be improved. That is to say, the quality of its services reaches a certain level. (3). From personal and satisfaction attribute, it can be discovered that it is worthy to discuss the further variables, marital status, level of education and occupation.
期刊論文
1.Chu, Raymond K. S.、Choi, Tat(2000)。An Importance-performance Analysis of Hotel Selection Factors in the Hong Kong Hotel Industry: A Comparison of Business and Leisure Travellers。Tourism Management,21(4),363-377。  new window
2.Kozak, Metin、Nield, Kevin(1998)。Importance-performance Analysis and Cultural Perspectives in Romanian Black Sea Resorts。Anatolia: An International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research,9(2),99-116。  new window
3.Martilla, John A.、James, John C.(1997)。Importance-Performance Analysis。Journal of Marketing,41(1),77-79。  new window
4.Sethna, Beheruz N.(1982)。Extensions and Testing of Importance-performance Analysis。Business Economic,17(4),28-31。  new window
5.Cardozo, Richard N.(1965)。An Experimental Study of Customer Effort, Expectation, and Satisfaction。Journal of Marketing Research,2(3),244-249。  new window
6.Fornell, Claes(1992)。A national customer satisfaction barometer: The Swedish experience。Journal of Marketing,56(1),6-21。  new window
7.Chapman, Randall G.(1993)。Brand performance comparatives。The Journal of Product & Brand Management,2(1),42-50。  new window
研究報告
1.薛保瑕、孫華翔、財團法人國家文化藝術基金會(2002)。文化創意產業概況分析調查 (計畫編號:(91)055.606)。臺北:行政院經濟建設委員會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.周能傳、詹偉雄(2005)。創意生活產業魔法書。臺北市:典藏藝術家庭。  延伸查詢new window
2.施顏祥(2002)。文化創意產業發展計劃--挑戰2008國家重點發展計劃。臺北:行政院經濟建設委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃俊英(2000)。多變量分析。台北:中國經濟企業研究所。  延伸查詢new window
4.Kotler, Philip(1994)。Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
其他
1.文化創意產業推動組織(2003)。文化創意產業發展現況,http://www.cci.org.tw/portal/plan/what.asp。  延伸查詢new window
2.范子凡(2003)。從Artkey談藝術文化財的授權與交易,http://www.cca.gov.tw/case。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE