:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:景觀複雜度對自然景觀偏好之影響
書刊名:都市與計劃
作者:謝孟倫林晏州
作者(外文):Hsieh, Meng-lunLin, Yann-jou
出版日期:2011
卷期:38:4
頁次:頁427-447
主題關鍵詞:景觀複雜度碎形維度景觀偏好Landscape complexityFractal dimensionLandscape preference
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:25
  • 點閱點閱:149
在景觀偏好相關研究中,景觀複雜度與景觀偏好之間的關係一直都是許多學者致力研究的方向。然而,在較早期的研究中,皆缺乏較客觀測量景觀複雜度之方式,研究之成果亦有所不同。碎形維度為近年來新興的概念,具有自我相似之特性及描述景觀中複雜特徵之能力,因此本研究嘗試利用碎形維度作為景觀複雜度的測量指標,探討景觀複雜度與景觀偏好之關係,並嘗試透過實證研究驗證複雜度與景觀偏好之關係曲線。本研究以自然景觀照片作為刺激物,測量受測者對一系列自然景觀照片之景觀偏好,同時利用軟體分析每張照片之碎形維度值。研究結果顯示自然景觀偏好與碎形維度值兩者之間呈一倒 U字形二次曲線關係,當碎形維度值約為 1,333時,景觀偏好值最高,表示人們偏好複雜度中間偏低之自然景觀。透過碎形維度作為測量指標,本研究確實驗證前人對景觀複雜度與景觀偏好倒 U曲線關係之假設,在景觀複雜度相關研究中極具貢獻。
The effect of landscape complexity on landscape preference has long been discussed. However, previous studies had difficulty objectively measuring landscape complexity, thus have obtained varied results. This study attempts to evaluate the effect of landscape complexity on individual preferences for natural landscapes, and to verify the relationship between them. Fractal dimension, a newly emerged concept, is applied as the index of landscape complexity in this study because of its self-similarity identity and ability to describe the complexity of landscape characteristics. This study uses a series of natural landscape pictures as stimuli, where the preferences of each picture are evaluated by the participants, and the fractal dimension (Db) is measured by software. The analytical results show the existence of an inverted U-shape curve between the fractal dimension and landscape preference, 1.333 is the most strongly preferred Db value. According to the result, people preferred lower-middle landscape complexi ty most, which confirms the hypothesis proposed by previous researchers. The application of fractal dimension and the results presented in this study are valuable in related fields and can contribute to the future research.
期刊論文
1.鄭佳昆、沈立、全珍衡(20100200)。熟悉度於不同情境下對視覺景觀偏好之影響探討。戶外遊憩研究,22(4),1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林晏州(20021200)。行道樹景觀美質評估方法之研究。造園學報,8(2),67-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Hagerhall, C. M.、Purcell, T.、Taylor, R.(2004)。Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette outlines as a predictor of landscape preference。Journal of Environmental Psychology,24(2),247-255。  new window
4.Berlyne, D. E.(1963)。Complexity and incongruity variables as determinants of exploratory choice and evaluative ratings。Canadian Journal of Psychology,17(3),274-290。  new window
5.徐思琦、林晏州(2001)。影響捷運系統高架路軌結構體色彩偏好因素之研究。中國園藝,47(4),419-430。  延伸查詢new window
6.Cubukcu, E.、Kahraman, I.(2008)。Hue, saturation, lightness, and building exterior preference: An empirical study in Turkey comparing architects' and nonarchitects' evaluative and cognitive judgments。Color Research and Application,33(5),395-405。  new window
7.Health, T.、Smith, S.、Lim, B.(2000)。Tall buildings and the urban skyline: The effect of visual complexity on preferences。Environment and Behavior,32(4),541-556。  new window
8.黃照婷、林晏州(20090200)。草花色彩配色之偏好與色知覺關係之研究。造園景觀學報,14(4),19-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.García, L.、Hernández, J.、Ayuga, F.(2003)。Analysis of the exterior colour of agroindustrial buildings: A computer aided approach to landscape integration。Journal of Environmental Management,69(1),93-104。  new window
10.王佩琪、林晏州(19981200)。景觀規劃中色彩計畫流程之探討。造園學報,5(2),1-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Sommer, R.、Summit, J.、Clements, A.(1993)。Slide ratings of street tree attributes: Some methodological issues and answers。Landscape Journal,12(1),17-22。  new window
12.Daniel, T. C.(2001)。Whether scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century。Landscape and Urban Planning,54(1/4),267-281。  new window
13.歐聖榮、曾怡錦(20011200)。不同草花色彩配置環境之偏好研究。造園學報,7(2),121-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Kaplan, S.、Kaplan, R.、Wendt, J. S.(1972)。Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban visual material。Perception and Psychophysics,12(4),354-356。  new window
15.蔡厚男、呂慧穎(20030600)。都市化對景觀碎裂影響的碎形分析。中國園藝,49(2),233-248。  延伸查詢new window
16.曹正、王澤種(19951200)。道路景觀視覺複雜性之研究。造園學報,2(1),83-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Nasar, J. L.(1983)。Adult viewers’ preferences in residential scenes: A study of the relationship of environmental attributes to preference。Environment and Behavior,15,589-614。  new window
18.Zube, Ervin H.、Sell, James L.、Taylor, Jonathan G.(1982)。Landscape perception: Research, application and theory。Landscape Planning,9(1),1-33。  new window
19.陳俊銘、林晏州(2001)。民眾對都市天際線景觀知覺與偏好之研究。都市與計劃,28(3),367-386。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Anderson, L. M.、Schroeder, H. W.(1983)。Application of wildland scenic assessment method to the urban landscape。Landscape and Urban Planning,10(3),219-237。  new window
21.Berube, D.、Jebrak, M.(1999)。High precision boundary fractal analysis for shape characterization。Computer and Geosciences,25(9),1059-1071。  new window
22.Wohlwill, J. F.(1968)。Amount of stimulus exploration and preference as differential functions of stimulus complexity。Perception and Psychophysics,4(5),307-312。  new window
23.Xu, T.、Moore I. D.、Gallant J. C.(1993)。Fractals, fractal dimensions and landscapes a review。Geomorphology,8(4),245-262。  new window
24.Camgoz, N.、Yener, C.、Guvenc, D.(2001)。Effects of hue, saturation, and brightness on preference。Color Research and Application,27(3),199-207。  new window
25.Hanyu, K.(2000)。Visual properties and affective appraisals in residential areas in daylight。Journal of Environmental Psychology,20(3),273-284。  new window
26.Herzog, T. R.、Shier, R. L.(2000)。Complexity, age, and building preference。Environment and Behavior,32(4),557-575。  new window
27.Kenkel, N. C.、Walker, D. J.(1996)。Fractals in the biological sciences。Coenoses,11(2),77-100。  new window
28.Longley, P. A.、Batty, M.(1989)。On the fractal measurement of geographical boundaries。Geographical Analysis,21(1),47-67。  new window
29.Spehar, B.、Clifford, C. W.、Newell, B. R.、Taylor, R. P.(2003)。Chaos and graphics: Universal aesthetic of fractals。Computers & Graphics,27(5),813-820。  new window
30.Cooper, J.(2003)。Fractal assessment of street level skylines: A possible means of assessing and comparing character。Urban Morphology,7(2),73-82。  new window
31.Stamps, A. E.(2002)。Fractals, skylines, nature and beauty。Landscape and Urban Planning,60(3),163-184。  new window
32.Taylor, R.(2001)。Architects' reaches for the clouds: How fractals may figure in our appreciation of a proposed new building。Nature,410。  new window
33.Thayer, R. L.、Atwood, B. G.(1978)。Plants, complexity and pleasure in urban and suburban environments。Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior,3(2),67-76。  new window
34.Cooper, J.(2005)。Assessing urban character: The use of fractal analysis of street edges。Urban Morphology,9(2),96-107。  new window
35.Cooper, J.、Oskrochi, R.(2008)。Fractal analysis of street vistas: A potential tool for assessing levels of visual variety in everyday street scenes。Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,35(2),349-363。  new window
會議論文
1.謝孟倫、林晏州(2010)。色彩及碎形維度對自然景觀偏好之影響18-34。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃瑞育(1993)。遊憩區開發程度與遊憩設施色彩選擇之研究--以涼亭為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳品雯(2006)。碎形維度與景觀偏好關係之研究。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kaplan, Rachel、Kaplan, Stephen(1989)。The experience of nature: A psychological perspective。Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.吳鼎武、瓦歷斯(2003)。飆碎形:電腦繪圖碎形設計與創作。台北:田園城市文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.Cheung, K. C.、Wells, N. M.(2004)。The natural environment & human well-being: Insights from fractal composition analysis?。Harmonic and Fractal Image Analysis。Purkynova。  new window
4.Litton, R. B.(1968)。Forest Landscape Description and Inventories: A Basis for Landplaning and Design。Fort Collins。  new window
5.Mandelbrot, B. B.(1977)。The Fractal Geometry of Hature。New York。  new window
6.Wohlwill. J. F.(1976)。Environmental aesthetics: The environment as an affect。Human Behavior and Environment。New York。  new window
7.Daniel, T. C.、Boster, R. S.(1976)。Measuring Landscape Aesthetics: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method。Fort Collins。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE