:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:文創商品的隱喻設計模式
書刊名:設計學報
作者:王鴻祥洪瑞璘
作者(外文):Wang, Hung-hsiangHung, Jui-lin
出版日期:2011
卷期:16:4
頁次:頁35-55
主題關鍵詞:工業設計隱喻設計方法文創商品Industrial designMetaphorDesign methodCultural and creative industry
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(15) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:15
  • 共同引用共同引用:42
  • 點閱點閱:124
文創商品設計是臺灣文化創意價值鏈中最重要的環節之一,其設計手法經常涉及隱喻。本研究嘗試結合對比模型、突顯不平衡模式、結構映射理論等隱喻理論,發展出一套以特徵作為思考單位、以關係作為連結基礎、並以相似性貫穿全場的思考架構;依序透過以相似性判斷、特徵擷取模式、特徵映射模式和特徵組合脈絡圖為工具,提出一套適用於文創商品的設計模式。本模式藉由射日神話、糖葫蘆、彈珠檯等臺灣文化元素作為來源物、LED燈具作為目標物進行操作測試;結果顯示,行為脈絡的關係相似,可賦予產品顯著的象徵意義,而情節脈絡的關係相似,則有助於產品功能的創新;利用關係相似為架構,可把人(使用者)、事(環境、文化)、物(產品)的脈絡,以特徵的角度予以拆解與重組,即可轉變作為具有隱喻性與創新性的解決方案。本隱喻設計模式可幫助設計者透過相似性比較,從抽象的文化概念與具象的文化器物中,以擷取、融合、轉化和類比等方式來界定隱喻目標(產品)與隱喻來源(文化),進而發展造形功能創新且可詮釋出特定文化涵義的文創商品。
In the value chain of cultural and creative industry, where metaphor is a common tool, design of culture-inspired products is one of the most important parts. This study proposes a new approach to metaphorical design method for the cultural and creative products. Integrating the notions of contrast model, salience imbalance model and structure-mapping theory, this method uses features as the primitive of metaphor, relations as the dynamic links between the features, and similarity judgment as the framework. It provides practical feature-mapping charts and feature-context charts for designers’ similarity judgment and feature retrieval. To verify the effectivity of the proposed model, three design projects with LED lighting as metaphor target, and sun-shooting myth, Tanglulu dessert and traditional pinball game as metaphor sources, are implemented. Results reveal that the behavior-level relational similarity between the source and target is positive to the symbolic meaning of the designs, whereas the action-level relational similarity is supportive to the functional innovation. The relational similarity is useful for de-composing and re-combining the elements about users, products and cultural context to transform into a creative and metaphorical solution. The method proposed is helpful for designers to restructure the abstract concepts and concrete objects from culture domain in order to design and develop products with creative form and function, as well as cultural significance.
期刊論文
1.Zachary, J. M.、Korfhage, R. R.(1999)。A Distance and Angle Similarity Measure Method。Journal of the American Society for Information Science,50(9),772-778。  new window
2.林銘煌、黃慶賢(2002)。比喩設計的邏輯關連與視覺認知。設計學報,7(2),1-22。  延伸查詢new window
3.Tversky, Amos(1977)。Features of similarity。Psychological Review,84(4),327-352。  new window
4.Markussen, T.(2009)。Bloody robots as emotional design: How emotional structures may change expectations of technology use in hospitals。International Journal of Design,3(2),27-39。  new window
5.Gentner, Dedre(1988)。Metaphor as structure-mapping: The relational shift。Child Development,59(1),47-59。  new window
6.Gentner, D.(1983)。Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy。Cognitive Science,7(2),155-170。  new window
7.何明泉、林其祥、劉怡君(19961200)。文化商品開發設計之構思。設計學報,1(1),1-15。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Lin, Rung-Tai(2007)。Transforming Taiwan Aboriginal Cultural Features into Modern Product Design: A Case Study of a Cross-cultural Product Design Model。International Journal of Design,1(2),45-53。  new window
9.林榮泰(20050700)。文化創意‧設計加值。藝術欣賞,1(7),26-32。  延伸查詢new window
10.Casakin, H. P.(2007)。Factors of metaphors in design problem-solving: Implications for design creativity。International Journal of Design,1(2),21-33。  new window
11.Ortony, A.、Reynolds, R. E.、Arter, J. A.(1978)。Metaphor: Theoretical and empirical research。Psychological Bulletin,85,919-943。  new window
12.Zachary, J. M.、Rasmussen, E. M.(2001)。Developing a new similarity measure from two different perspectives。Information Processing & Management,37(2),279-294。  new window
13.Zachary, J. M.、Korfhage, R. R.(1999)。DARE: Distance and angle retrieval environment: A tale of the two measures。Journal of the American Society for Information Science,50(9),779-787。  new window
圖書
1.Hawkes, T.、陳永寬(1988)。結構主義與符號學。臺北:南方叢書。  延伸查詢new window
2.Lakoff, George、Johnson, Mark、Chou, Shizhen(1980)。Metaphors We Live By。University of Chicago Press。  new window
3.黃台生、Warren, K.(2007)。設計典範。台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.Black, M.(1962)。Model and metaphor。Ithaca, New York。  new window
5.Ortony, A.(1991)。Metaphor and thought。New York。  new window
6.Gentner, D.(1986)。Analogy。A companion to cognitive science。Oxford。  new window
7.Melara, R. D.(1992)。The concept of perceptual similarity: From psychophysics to cognitive psychology。Psychophysical approaches to cognition。Amsterdam。  new window
8.Tversky, A.、Gati, I.(1978)。Studies of similarity。Cognition and categorization。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
其他
1.Taiwan International Cultural & Creative Industry Expo(2011)。文創精品獎願景,http://www.iccie.tw, 20110911。  new window
圖書論文
1.Black, Max(1979)。More about metaphor。Metaphor and thought。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE