臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：景觀設計中眺望藏匿理論模式之應用
書刊名：建築學報
作者：歐聖榮／柯嘉鈞 引用關係／許哲瑜
作者(外文)：Ou, Sheng-jung／Ko, Chia-chun／Hsu, Che-yu
出版日期：2012
卷期：80
頁次：頁111-129
主題關鍵詞：景觀偏好；開闊感；安全感；動態模擬；Landscape preference；Openness；Safety；Dynamic simulation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:98
以「能夠看而不被看見」這樣的概念為基礎，Appleton於1975年時提出了眺望－藏匿理論（眺匿理論）。對於眺匿理論，雖然有相關的應用性研究，但更深入應用於景觀設計上的研究則較為缺乏，本研究期望能將該理論具體應用，界定出眺望與藏匿之間的可能比值，讓景觀設計者能有所參酌。為了達成上述研究目標，本研究採用量化研究的方式，利用電腦模擬技術模擬不同眺望與藏匿程度的景觀場景，透過問卷調查的方式，找出受測者所偏好的眺望－藏匿的比例關係。研究結果顯示，不同的環境下，觀賞者偏好的眺望與藏匿的分佈比例各不相同；無論幾何式庭園或自然山林環境，視覺延伸性顯著與偏好相關；安全感與偏好顯著相關，並非單純的僅為藏匿環境的知覺感受。本研究成果可提供給景觀設計者應用，實際有效地創造出人們所偏好的環境。
Based upon the concept of "seeing without being seen", Appleton proposed the prospect-refuge theory (P-R theory) in 1975. Although there are some applied researches related to the P-R theory, there still needs further examination about the rationality of P-R theory in landscape design. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to propose the possible ratios between prospect and refuge for landscape designers.To achieve the study purpose, the study adopted a quantitative method. The study used the technique of computer simulation to generate landscape scenes that have different degrees of prospect and refuge. Followed by questionnaire survey, the study tried to find out the preference of each setting with different P-R ration. The results showed that three settings of the study have different P-R ration that observers prefer. No matter in which setting (geometrical garden or natural environment), the visual extension and sense of safety are significantly related to preference. The sense of safety does not only represent the perception of refuge. Based upon the results, a practical guidance in creating a preferred environment can be provided for landscape designers.
期刊論文
1.Daniel, T. C.(2001)。Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century。Landscape and Urban Planning，54(1-4)，267-281。  new window
2.Herzog, Thomas R.、Kropscott, Laura S.(2004)。Legibility, mystery, and visual access as predictors of preference and perceived danger in forest settings without pathways。Environment and Behavior，36(5)，659-677。  new window
3.Ruddell, E. J.、Hammitt, W. E.(1987)。Prospect refuge theory: A psychological orientation for edge effect in recreation environments。Journal of Leisure Research，19(4)，249-260。  new window
4.Hagerhall, C. M.(2000)。Clustering predictors of landscape preference in the traditional Swedish cultural landscape: Prospect-refuge, mystery, age and management。Journal of Environmental Psychology，20(1)，89-90。  new window
5.Herzog, T. R.、Bryce, A.(2007)。Mystery and preference in within-forest settings。Environment and Behavior，39(6)，779-796。  new window
6.Herzog, Thomas R.、Kutzli, Glenn E.(2002)。Preference and Perceived Danger in Field/Forest Settings。Environment And Behavior，34(6)，819-835。  new window
7.Stamps, A. E. III(2005)。Visual permeability, locomotive permeability, safety, and enclosure。Environment and Behavior，37(5)，587-619。  new window
8.Appleton, J.(1984)。Prospect and refuge re-visited。Landscape Journal，3(2)，91-103。  new window
9.Clamp, P.、Powell, M.(1982)。Prospect-refuge theory under test。Landscape Research，7(3)，7-8。  new window
10.Fischer, M. A.、Shrout, P. E.(2006)。Children’s liking of landscape paintings as a function of their perceptions of prospect, refuge, and hazard。Environment and Behavior，38(3)，373-393。  new window
11.Galindo, P.、Hidalgo, C.(2005)。Aesthetic preferences and the attribution of meaning: Environmental categorization processes in the evaluation of urban scenes。International Journal of Psychology，40(1)，19-26。  new window
12.Mealey, L.、Theis, P.(1995)。The relationship between mood and preference among natural landscape: An evolutionary perspective。Ethology and Sociobiology，16(3)，247-256。  new window
13.Herzog, T. R.、Kirk, K. M.(2005)。Pathway curvature and border visibility as predictors of preference and danger in forest settings。Environment and Behavior，37(5)，620-639。  new window
14.Heyligers, P. C.(1981)。Prospect/refuge symbolism of dune landscapes。Landscape Research，6(1)，7-11。  new window
15.Strumse, E.(1994)。Environmental attributes and the prediction of visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in Western Norway。Journal of Environmental Psychology，14(4)，293-303。  new window
16.Mumcu, S.、Düzenli, T.、Özbilen, A.(2010)。Prospect and refuge as the predictors of preference for seating areas。Scientific Research and Essays，5(11)，1223-1233。  new window
17.Natori, Y.、Chenoweth, R.(2008)。Differences in rural landscape perceptions and preferences between farmers and naturalists。Journal of Environmental Psychology，28(3)，250-267。  new window
18.Ribe, R. G.(1989)。The aesthetics of forestry: What has empirical preference research taught us?。Environmental Management，13(1)，55-74。  new window
19.Rogge, E.、Nevens, F.、Gulinck, H.(2007)。Perception of rural landscapes in Flanders: Looking beyond aesthetics。Landscape and Urban Planning，82(4)，159-174。  new window
20.Scott, S. C.(1993)。Complexity and mystery as predictors of interior preferences。Journal of Interior Design，19(1)，25-33。  new window
21.Stamps, A. E. III(2004)。Mystery, complexity, legibility and coherence: A meta-analysis。Journal of Environmental Psychology，24(1)，1-16。  new window
會議論文
1.Ko, C. C.、Ou, S. J.(2009)。Exploring the preference framework of Prospect-Refuge theory in natural environment。PA, USA。  new window
2.Ou, S. J.、Ko, C. C.(2010)。Examining prospect-refuge theory in an geometrical garden。PA, USA。  new window
學位論文
1.Woodcock, David Marcus(1982)。A Functionalist Approach to Environmental Preference，MI, USA。  new window
2.Luymes, D.(1992)。Analysis Human Use Patterns in Urban Parks: A Cognitive Approach。The University of Guelph，Ontario, Canada。  new window
圖書
1.Appleton, J.(1996)。The Experience of Landscape。London, UK：Wiley。  new window
2.Kaplan, Rachel、Kaplan, Stephen(1989)。The experience of nature: A psychological perspective。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Kaplan, S.、Kaplan, R.(1982)。Competition and Environment: Functioning in an Uncertain World。NY, USA。  new window
4.Nasar, J. L.、Julian, D.、Buchman, S.、Humphreys, D.、Mrohaly, M.(1992)。The emotional quality of scenes and observation points: A look at prospect and refuge。Environmental Aesthetics: Theory, Research, and Applications。NY, USA。  new window
5.Herzog, T. R.(1992)。A Cognitive Analysis of Preference for Field and Forest Environments。Environmental Aesthetics: Theory, Research, & Applications。NY, USA。  new window
6.Kaplan, S.(1975)。An Informal model for the prediction of preference。Landscape Assessment: Values, Perceptions And Resources。PA, USA。  new window
7.Kaplan, S.(1992)。Environmental preference in a knowledge-seeking, knowledge-using organism。The Adapted Mind: volutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture。Oxford, UK。  new window
圖書論文
1.Ulrich, Roger S.(1983)。Aesthetic and Affective Response to Natural Environment。Human behavior and environment, vol.6: Behavior and natural environment。New York, NY：Plenum Press。  new window
2.Ulrich, Roger S.(1993)。Biophilia, Biophobia, and Natural Landscapes。The Biophilia Hypothesis。Island Press/Shearwater。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：924（臺灣：909，外國：15） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1725833 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67533718
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上