:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:The Factors Affecting Life Satisfaction: Recreation Benefits and Quality of Life Perspectives
書刊名:大專體育學刊
作者:李介祿 引用關係王青怡
作者(外文):Li, Chieh-luWang, Ching-yi
出版日期:2012
卷期:14:4
頁次:頁407-418
主題關鍵詞:身體健康心理健康幸福感自然資源遊憩惠蓀國家森林遊樂區Physical healthPsychological healthWell-beingNatural resource recreationHuisun National Forest Recreation Area
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:29
遊憩研究從最初的三個層級即活動、場域和動機,去開始瞭解人們從事什麼活動,在哪裡參與活動和為什麼參與這些遊憩活動。遊憩研究的第四個層級遊憩效益,是近來相關學者及從業者越來越重視的議題。遊憩效益對生活品質有相當的貢獻,更可以增加人們之生活滿意度。生活品質為常用於評估個人以及社會的幸福感。本研究旨在森林遊樂的環境下探討上述變數之間的因果關係。本研究針對2010-2011年到惠蓀國家森林遊樂區的遊客進行問卷調查,獲得有效問卷767份,有效問卷回收率90%,經由因素分析、信度分析及階層多元迴歸分析等統計方法來整理資料。針對遊憩效益問項因素分析結果發現可歸納成3個構面,分別命名為「健康構面」、「內省構面」及「學習構面」。其中以健康構面較其他2個構面對遊憩效益之解釋力較大。接著測試3個構面之信度。分析結果Cronbach's alpha 值顯示良好及可靠的信度。最後在階層多元迴歸分析方面,發現健康、內省及學習構面中,健康構面相較其他2個遊憩效益構面對生活滿意度的貢獻較大。更進一步分析發現,生活品質對生活滿意度之影響力較休閒效益大。本研究結論認為遊客在森林遊樂環境下,突顯對健康遊憩效益認知的需求;此外遊憩效益與生活品質可以有效的預測生活滿意度。本研究藉由結果討論及研究意含以提供森林遊樂經營管理與未來相關研究之參考。
Recreation research has evolved from three primary levels, including activities, settings and motivations to understand what, where and why people participating in recreation. The fourth level benefits are attracting more interests from recreation scholars and practitioners. Recreation benefits may contribute to enhance quality of life (QOL) and further life satisfaction for people. QOL is frequently used to evaluate the general well-being of individuals and societies. However, what kind of benefits would derive when people participated in recreation activity, and what factors would mostly contribute to people’s life satisfaction remains unknown. This study explored to identify the relationships among aforementioned factors in a context of forest recreation. In this study, seven hundred and sixty-seven visitors of Huisun National Forest Recreation Area in central Taiwan were involved for the survey with a 90% net response. First we analyzed the data with 17 beneficial measures. The results clearly showed three factors as we named health, introspection and learning benefits. Then we tested the reliability of measurement, which indicated that the measures demonstrated good reliability of instruments as shown from their Cronbach's alpha values. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed that health benefits tended to be more important compared to introspection and learning benefits for people's life satisfaction. Furthermore, we found quality of life tended to contribute more on life satisfaction than those recreation benefits factors. We concluded that visitors' perceptions of health were salient regarding recreation benefits in forest recreation. Furthermore, recreation benefits and QOL predicted the life satisfaction effectively. The findings showed implications for recreation management, and also provided a platform for future studies.
期刊論文
1.Driver, B. L.(1997)。The defining moment of benefits。Parks and Recreation,32(12),38-41。  new window
2.Zhan, L.(1992)。Quality of life: Conceptual and measurement issues。Journal of Advanced Nursing,17(7),795-800。  new window
3.THE WHOQOL GROUP(1998)。The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties。Journal of Society Science Medicine,46(12),1569-1585。  new window
4.Diener, E.、Suh, E.(1997)。Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators。Social Indicators Research,40(1),189-216。  new window
5.Diener, Edward D.、Emmons, Robert A.、Larsen, Randy J.、Griffin, Sharon(1985)。The satisfaction with life scale。Journal of Personality Assessment,49(1),71-75。  new window
研究報告
1.Godbey, G.、Mowen, A.(2010)。The Benefits of Physical Activity Provided by Park and Recreation Services: The Scientific Evidence。Ashburn, VA:National Recreation and Park Association。  new window
圖書
1.Gelman, Andrew、Hill, Jennifer(2007)。Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models。Cambridge University Press。  new window
其他
1.Abbey, A., & Andrews, F. M.(1985)。Modeling the psychological determinants of life quality。  new window
2.Costanza , R.(2000)。Visions of alternative (unpredictable) futures and their use in policy analysis.。  new window
3.Diener, E., & Lucas, R(1999)。Personality and subjective well-being。  new window
4.Dustin, D. L., Bricker, K. S., & Schwab, K. A.(2010)。People and nature: Toward an ecological model of health promotion。  new window
5.Kaczynski, A. T., Potwarka, L. R., & Saelens, B. E.(2008)。Association of park size, distance, and features with physical activity in neighborhood parks。  new window
6.Kuo, F. E.(2010)。Park and other green environments: Essential components of a healthy human habitat。  new window
7.Li, C., Absher, J. D., Zinn, H. C., Graefe, A. R., & Chick, G. E.(2009)。A multi-ethnic comparison of perceptions of forest recreation service quality。  new window
8.Li, C., Lo, S., Wang, C., & Chick, G(2011)。Comparative research in parks and recreation management.。  new window
9.Li, C., & Wang, C(2011)。Recreation benefit, quality of life and life satisfaction。  new window
10.Manning, R. E(2011)。Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction。  new window
11.Payne, L., Ainsworth, B., & Godbey, G.(2010)。Leisure, health, and wellness: Making the connections。  new window
12.Penedo, F. J., & Dahn, J. R.(2005)。Exercise and wellbeing: A review of mental and physical health benefits associated with physical activity。  new window
13.Schmidt, S., Mühlan, H., & Power, M.(2006)。The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: Psychometric results of a cross-cultural field study。  new window
14.Shrestha, R. K., & Loomis, J. B.(2001)。Testing a meta-analysis model for benefit transfer in international outdoor recreation。  new window
15.Sugiyama, T., & Ward Thompson, C.(2007)。Outdoor environments, activity and the well-being of older people: Conceptualising environmental support。  new window
16.Sugiyama, T., Ward Thompson, C., & Alves, S.(2009)。Association between neighborhood open space attributes and quality of life for older people in Britain。  new window
17.United Nations Development Programme.(1998)。Human development report 1998,New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
18.USDA Forest Service(2010)。Mt. Hood National Forest。  new window
19.Wang, C., & Li, C(2011)。The relationships of health benefits perceptions and motivation among different trip behaviors。  new window
20.Wang, C., & Li, C(2012)。The effects of socio-demographics on ecosystem service and human well-being。  new window
21.Weisberg, H. E., Krosnick, J. A., & Bowen, B. D.(1996)。An introduction to survey research, polling, and data analysis。  new window
圖書論文
1.Ajzen, I.(1991)。Benefits of Leisure: Asocial psychological perspective。Benefits of Leisure。State College, PA:Venture Publishing。  new window
2.Driver, B. L.、Bruns, D. H.(1999)。Concepts and uses of the benefits approach to leisure。Leisure studies: prospects for the twenty-first century。State College, Pennsylvania:Venture Publishing。  new window
3.Driver, B. L.、Tinsley, Howard E. A.、Manfredo, Michael J.(1991)。The paragraphs about leisure and recreation experience preference scales: results from two inventories designed to assess the breadth of the perceived psychological benefits of leisure。Benefits of Leisure。Stage College, PA:Venture Publishing。  new window
4.Wankel, L. M.、Berger, B. G.(1991)。The personal and social benefits of sport and physical activity。Benefits of leisure。Venture。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top