:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:開放中型100指數成分股平盤以下放空限制對股價行為之影響
書刊名:環球科技人文學刊
作者:吳如萍 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Juping
出版日期:2013
卷期:16
頁次:頁15-32
主題關鍵詞:融券異常報酬流動性波動性Short saleAbnormal returnMarket liquidityPrice volatility
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:18
  • 點閱點閱:104
本研究針對台灣中型100指數成分股從2007年11月12日,開放得低於前一營業日收盤價從事融券放空之政策,此事件對股價行為之影響,本文以事件研究法分析此事件對股價異常報酬、波動性、及流動性之影響,實證結果顯示,政策開放後,成分股之股價日報酬率在政策開放前預期心理導致產生異常負報酬,而在政策施行後則呈現顯著異常正報酬之反轉現象,顯示政策施行前具有過度反應之現象,在波動性中,則呈現風險增加,於衡量流動性變數中的深度及週轉率,則均呈現顯著降低之現象,因此,政府雖朝向市場自由化之目標,但考量市場風險性及流動性下,宜採漸近方式,逐步放寬融券賣出市值較大之股票以降低對市場的衝擊、波動性增加及流動性降低等不利影響。
The restriction of short-sale prices, which states that short-sale prices must not be lower than the closing price of previous trading day, had been released to the constituent stocks of the TSEC Taiwan Mid-Cap 100 index on November, 12, 2007. This study investigates the effects of waiving restriction on the price impact, market liquidity and price volatility. The Empirical results show that just before the waiving, there are abnormal negative returns on those component stocks. After the waiving, the abnormal return becomes positive. It shows a V shape. Furthermore, their volatilities increased and the market depth to measure the market liquidity decreased significantly after releasing the restriction. Therefore, the authorities should re-consider the impact on the market when they try to release the regulation toward the market freedom.
期刊論文
1.林家璋、施惠敏、黃厚銘(200711)。我國與美國股票市場價格限制制度之介紹與探討。證券暨期貨月刊,25(11),61-71。  延伸查詢new window
2.詹司如、林靖中、郭玟秀(20080700)。平盤以下可融券賣出對股票價格行為之影響。經濟與管理論叢,4(2),203-228。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Haruvy, E.、Noussair, C. N.(2006)。The effect of short-selling on bubbles and crashes in experimental spot asset markets。Journal of Finance,61(3),1119-1157。  new window
4.龔尚智、吳其昌(20000300)。以新上市公司樣本探討店頭市場開放信用交易對其股價波動性及效率性之影響。輔仁管理評論,7(1),161-181。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Grube, R. C.、Joy, O. M.、Panton, D. B.(1979)。Market Responses to Federal Reserve Changes in the Initial Margin Requirement。The Journal of Finance,34(3),659-674。  new window
6.Lee, S. B.、Yoo, T. Y.(1991)。Margin Regulation and Stock Market Response: Further Evidence from the U.S. and Some Pacific-Basin Countries。Review of Financial Economics,1,79-98。  new window
7.Rubinstein, M.(2004)。Great Moments in Financial Economics: III. Short-sales and Stock Prices。Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,28,177-194。  new window
8.Figlewski, Stephen、Webb, Gwendolyn P.(1993)。Options, Short Sales and Market Completeness。The Journal of Finance,48(2),761-777。  new window
9.Christophe, S. E.、Ferri, M. G.、Angel, J. J.(2004)。Short-selling prior to earnings announcements。Journal of Finance,59(4),1845-1876。  new window
10.Desai, Hemang、Ramesh, K.、Thiagarajan, S. Ramu、Balachandran, Bala V.(2002)。An Investigation of the Informational Role of Short Interest in the NASDAQ Market。Journal of Finance,57(5),2263-2287。  new window
11.Dubofsky, D. A.、Groth, J. C.(1984)。Exchange listing and stock liquidity。Journal of Financial Research,7(4),291-302。  new window
12.Chang, Eric C.、Cheng, Joseph W.、Yu, Yinghui(2007)。Short-sales Constraints and Price Discovery: Evidence from the Hong Kong market。Journal of Finance,62(5),2097-2121。  new window
13.Miller, E. M.(1977)。Risk, Uncertainty, and Divergence of Opinion。Journal of Finance,32(4),1151-1168。  new window
14.Beaver, William H.(1968)。The Information Content of Annual Earnings Announcement。Journal of Accounting Research,6(Suppl.),67-92。  new window
15.姚海青、杜化宇、陳勝源(19991100)。我國股票市場融資比率與融券保證金成數調整對股價波動性影響之研究。證券市場發展,11(2)=42,129-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Hardouvelis, Gikas A.(1990)。Margin requirements, volatility, and the transitory component of stock prices。American Economic Review,80(4),736-762。  new window
17.Peterson, P. P.(1989)。Event Studies: A Review of Issues and Methodology。Quarter Journal of Business and Economics,28(3),36-66。  new window
18.張瑞真、陳益璋(20071200)。融券放空政策對臺灣50指數波動性影響--GARCH模型應用。遠東學報,24(4),315-329。  延伸查詢new window
19.Schwert, G. William(1989)。Why Does Stock Market Volatility Change Over Time?。Journal of Finance,44(5),1115-1153。  new window
20.Ahn, Hee-Joon、Bae, Kee-Hong、Chan, Kalok(2001)。Limit Orders, Depth and Volatility: Evidence from the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong。Journal of Finance,56(2),767-788。  new window
21.Andersen, Torben Gustav、Bollerslev, Tim(1998)。Answering the Skeptics: Yes, Standard Volatility Models do Provide Accurate Forecasts。International Economic Review,39(4),885-905。  new window
22.陳達新、陳君達、賴智民(20070100)。開放信用交易對臺股股票報酬、波動性與週轉率之影響。經濟與管理論叢,3(1),97-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Bernstein, P. L.(1987)。Liquidity, Stock Markets, and Market Makers。Financial Management,16,54-62。  new window
24.Keim, D. B.、Madhavan, A.(1995)。Anatomy of the Trading Process: Empirical Evidence on the Behavior of Institutional Traders。Journal of Financial Economics,37,371-398。  new window
25.Woolridge, J. R.、Dickinson, A.(1994)。Short Selling and Common Stock Prices。Financial Analysts Journal,50,20-28。  new window
26.Ho, K. W.(1996)。Short-Sales Restrictions and Volatility: The Case of the Stock Exchange of Singapore。Pacific-Basin Finance Journal,4,377-391。  new window
研究報告
1.Charoenrook, A.、Daouk, H.(2003)。The World Price of Short Selling。  new window
學位論文
1.王林弘(2005)。平盤以下不得放空政策對台灣股市報酬分配之影響(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.錢茂安(2001)。我國股市相關政策與穩定措施之研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.鐘天豪(2000)。信用交易條件調整與股票市場之關連性研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.沈中華、李建然(2000)。事件研究法--財務與會計實證研究必備。華泰文化事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE