王念孫是清代傑出的校勘學家、訓詁學家，他對先秦、秦漢古籍的研究成果，至今仍普遍為學者肯定與採用。目前研究王氏之學的論著雖多，研究範圍卻長期局限在《廣雅疏證》、《讀書雜志》等幾部已經刊刻的著作上，難有突破。上海圖書館館藏王念孫的《管子》校本，直接反映了王氏校治《管子》的成果。本文首次介紹了校本原書的實態，並以原書比照《管子雜志》，發現當中有344條材料未經《雜志》載錄，亟待研究。校本主要的內容是校勘文字和訓釋詞句，本文以新見材料，從校勘、訓詁兩方面探論校本的價值，藉以總結王氏研究《管子》的實績。我們認為校本的校釋大多信實可從，它為我們提供了一個比較近實可靠的本子，幫助我們更準確理解《管子》及尹知章《注》同時又為我們提供了研究王念孫《管子》之學的第一手材料。

Wang Nian-Sun is an outstanding Qing scholar of textual criticism and semantics; his studies on pre-Qin, Qin and Han ancient texts have been widely acknowledged and adopted by scholars to this day. However many people investigate the great scholar's studies, the research materials so far have been limited to the ones that have been published, such as the ”Guangyashuzheng” and the ”Dushuzazhi”. This paper introduces Wang's block-printed edition of the ”Guanzi”, which is one of his collated works preserved in the Shanghai Library now, and compares it with his ”Guanzizazhi”. It is found that 344 entries of the book are not included in the ”Guanzizazhi”, which makes a complete review necessary. Taking the full contents of the newly discovered materials into account, this paper attempts to evaluate the work's significance in textual criticism and semantics. As a first-hand material, this reliable edition helps readers to comprehend the ”Guanzi” and Yin Zhi-Zhang's annotations and to research into Wang's scholarship of the ”Guanzi” more accurately.