:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:生產中的現代性:科技信仰與科技侷限的競技場
書刊名:臺灣人類學刊
作者:官晨怡
作者(外文):Kuan, Chen-i
出版日期:2013
卷期:11:1
頁次:頁65-91
主題關鍵詞:產檢監控剖腹產現代性科技信仰風險Prenatal surveillanceCesarean sectionsModernityTechnocratic valueRisk
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:41
期刊論文
1.官晨怡(2010)。Reinterpret Maternal Requests of Cesarean Section in Taiwan。臺灣大學考古人類學刊,72,97-136。  延伸查詢new window
2.涂醒哲、蘇喜(1995)。肚皮無罪。醫望,8,67-69。  延伸查詢new window
3.Ayaz, Aqueela, et al.(2008)。Pre-labor Rupture of Membrances at Term in Patients with an Unfavorable Cervix: Active versus Conservative Management。Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology,47(2),192-196。  new window
4.Boyd, ME,、RH Usher,、FH. McLean(1983)。Fetal Macrosomia: Prediction, Risks, Proposed Management。Obstetrics & Gynecology,61,715-722。  new window
5.Holmberg, NG(1966)。Clinical Evaluation of the Pelvic Outlet。Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica,45,377-382。  new window
6.MacDonald, Margaret(2006)。Gender Expectation: Natural Bodies and Natural Births in the New Midwifery in Canada。Medical Anthropology Quarterly,20(2),235-256。  new window
7.Minkoff, Howard(2006)。The Ethics of Cesarean Section by Choice。Seminars in Perinatology,30,309-312。  new window
8.Parks, D Gene,、Harry K Ziel(1978)。Macrosomia. A Proposed Indication for Primary Cesarean Section。Obstetrics & Gynecology,52,407-409。  new window
9.Zamorski, Mark A.,、Wendy S. Biggs(2001)。Management of Suspected Fetal Macrosomia。American Family Physician,63(2),302-307。  new window
10.曾家琳、張珏(20060600)。「會陰切開術」的當代爭議與其必要性的論述分析。女學學誌,21,47-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.World Health Organization(1985)。Appropriate Technology for Birth。Lancet,2,436-437。  new window
12.Hopkins, Kristine(2000)。Are Brazilian Women Really Choosing to Deliver By Cesarean?。Social Science and Medicine,51(5),725-740。  new window
13.Lo, J.C.(2008)。Financial incentives do not always work - an example of caesarean sections in Taiwan。Health Policy,88,121-129。  new window
14.Faundes, Anibal、Cecatti, Jose Guilherme(1993)。Which Policy for Caesarian Sections in Brazil? An Analysis of Trends and Consequences。Health Policy and Planning,8(1),33-42。  new window
15.Horrigan, Terrence J.(2001)。Physicians Who Induce Labor for Fetal Macrosomia Do Not Reduce Cesarean Delivery Rates。Journal of Perinatology,2,93-96。  new window
16.Potter, Joseph E.(2007)。Women’s Autonomy and Scheduled Cesarean Sections in Brazil: A Cautionary Tale。Birth,35(1),33-40。  new window
17.Wendland, Claire L.(2007)。The Vanishing Mother: Cesarean Section and 'Evidence-based Obstetrics'。Medical Anthropology Quarterly,21(2),218-233。  new window
18.Hsu, Chin-Yuan、Lo, J. C.、Chang, Jui-Hsing、Chen, Chie-Pein、Yu, Suchuan、Huang, Fu-Yuan(2006)。Cesarean Births in Taiwan。International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics,96(1),57-61。  new window
會議論文
1.施麗雯(2013)。Prenatal Care Shopping in Taiwan: The Logic of Prenatal Care and the Logic of Choice。臺南:成功大學。  new window
學位論文
1.Kuan, Chen(2011)。Debates on Gender and Technology: Cesarean Births in Taiwan(博士論文)。Syracuse University.。  new window
2.吳嘉苓(1997)。Women, Medicine, and Power: The Social Transformation of Childbirth in Taiwan(-),Champaign, IL/ Urbana, IL。  new window
圖書
1.林崇熙(2010)。科技、風險與現代性。帝國邊緣:臺灣現代性的考察。台北:群學。  延伸查詢new window
2.國民健康局(2005)。孕婦健康手冊。臺中:國民健康局。  延伸查詢new window
3.張淑卿(2011)。國家、醫學專業與社會互動。中華民國發展史:社會發展(下冊)。台北:聯經。  延伸查詢new window
4.Davis-Floyd, Robbie, et al(2009)。Introduction。Birth Models That Work R。Berkeley:University of California Press。  new window
5.Davis-Floyd, Robbie E(2004)。Birth as an American Rite of Passage。Berkeley:University of California Press。  new window
6.Michelson, Karen L.,、Barbara Alvin(1988)。Technology and Context of Childbirth: A Comparison of Two Hospital Settings。Childbirth in America: Anthropological Perspectives。Massachusetts:Bergin & Garvey Publishers。  new window
7.Shanley, Laura Kaplan(1994)。Unassisted Childbirth。London:Bergin & Garvey。  new window
8.Walsh, Denis(2007)。Evidence-Based Care for Normal Labour and Birth: A Guide for Midwives。Routledge。  new window
9.Cassell, Philip(2003)。The Giddens Reader。London:The MacMillan Press。  new window
10.Martin, Emily(1987)。The Woman in the Body: a Cultural Analysis of Reproduction。Milton Keynes:Boston:Open University Press:Beacon Press。  new window
11.Beck, Ulrich(1992)。Risk society: Toward a new modernity。London:Sage。  new window
12.Giddens, Anthony(1990)。The Consequences of Modernity。Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press。  new window
13.Rothman, Barbara Katz(1989)。Recreating Motherhood: Ideology and Technology in a Patriarchal Society。NY:Norton。  new window
其他
1.王文中(2012)。「催生」好嗎,http://mag.udn.com/mag/newsstand/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=428588, 2012/06/07。  new window
2.吳信宏(2007)。剖腹生產 vs.自然生產:妳的考慮與選擇,http://www.howmama.com.tw/b112/vs-t106702/, 2012/06/07。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳建德(2004)。認識剖腹產及其術後飲食注意事項,http://www.jah.org.tw/form/index-1.asp?m=3&m1=8&m2=364&gp=361&id=249, 2008/12/15。  new window
4.宋碧琳(2012)。「催生」不用怕!必要時能保母子均安,http://www.mababy.com/knowledge/article.aspx?aid=DE2467213D0AC73A, 2012/06/07。  延伸查詢new window
5.邱宜君(2010)。令人擔心的高剖腹產率,財團法人臺灣醫療改革基金會。,http://www.thrf.org.tw/Page_Show.asp?Page_ID=1203, 2012/06/07。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃玉芳(20040210)。臺灣剖腹產比率高達三成三,世界第三。  延伸查詢new window
7.薛桂文(20060422)。利誘自然產不成健保調給付,台北:民生報。  延伸查詢new window
8.American Preganacy Association(2007)。Cephalopelvic Disproportion (CPD),http://americanpregnancy.org/labornbirth/cephalopelvicdisproportion.html, 2013/06/07。  new window
9.BellyBelly.com.au(2013)。Small Pelvis? Here's The Truth About Cephalopelvic Disproportion (CPD),http://www.bellybelly.com.au/birth/small-pelvis-big-babycpd#.UbNU2NiDFjr。  new window
圖書論文
1.Lane, Karen(1995)。The Medical Model of the Body as a Site of Risk: A Case Study of Childbirth。Medicine, Health, and Risk: Sociological Approaches。Blackwell。  new window
2.劉士永(20110000)。延續或斷裂? 1940~50年代臺灣的公共衛生。多元鑲嵌與創造轉化 : 臺灣公共衛生百年史。臺北:遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE