:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:孕產照護邏輯:臺灣女性的新生育選擇與共同修補
書刊名:女學學誌:婦女與性別研究
作者:施麗雯 引用關係
作者(外文):Shih, Li-wen
出版日期:2019
卷期:44
頁次:頁1-46
主題關鍵詞:溫柔生產助產師生育自主生育選擇照護邏輯共同修補Gentle birthMidwifeReproductive autonomyReproductive choiceThe logic of careShared doctoring
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:68
  • 點閱點閱:4
期刊論文
1.張靜宜、高美玲(20081000)。生產疼痛的意義。助產雜誌,50,10-15。  延伸查詢new window
2.Clarke, Adele E.、Shim, Janet K.、Mamo, Laura、Fosket, Jennifer Ruth、Fishman, Jennifer R.(2003)。Biomedicalization: Technoscientific Transformations of Health, Illness, and U.S. Biomedicine。American Sociological Review,68(2),161-194。  new window
3.郭素珍(20050600)。人性化生產。護理雜誌,52(3),21-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林綺雲(19930700)。臺灣助產士專業的變遷--社會學的解析與省思。國立臺北護專學報,10,269-284。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳嘉苓(20111200)。編排風險:多胚胎孕育的多重社會科技網絡。臺灣社會學,22,111-156。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.官晨怡(20130600)。生產中的現代性:科技信仰與科技侷限的競技場。臺灣人類學刊,11(1),65-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Kuan, Chen-I(2014)。"Suffering twice": The gender politics of cesarean sections in Taiwan。Medical Anthropology Quarterly,28(3),399-418。  new window
8.McKay, Susan(1991)。Shared power: The essence of humanized childbirth。Pre- and Peri-natal Psychology Journal,5(4),283-295。  new window
9.吳嘉苓(20000700)。醫療專業、性別與國家:臺灣助產士興衰的社會學分析。臺灣社會學研究,4,191-268。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.官晨怡(20100600)。A Reinterpretation of Maternal Requests for Cesarean Sections in Taiwan。考古人類學刊,72,97-136。new window  new window
11.Meyers, Diana Tietjens(2001)。The rush to motherhood-pronatalist discourse and women's autonomy。Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society,26(3),735-773。  new window
12.Christiaens, Wendy、Bracke, Piet(2009)。Place of birth and satisfaction with childbirth in Belgium and The Netherlands。Midwifery,25(2),e11-e19。  new window
13.van Teijlingen, Edwin(2005)。A critical analysis of the medical model as used in the study of pregnancy and childbirth。Sociological Research Online,10(2),1-15。  new window
14.Stevens, Gabrielle、Miller, Yvette D.、Watson, Bernadette、Thompson, Rachel(2016)。Choosing a model of maternity care: decision support needs of Australian women。Birth,43(2),167-175。  new window
15.Miller, Amy Chasteen、Shriver, Thomas E.(2012)。Women's childbirth preferences and practices in the United States。Social Science and Medicine,75(4),709-716。  new window
16.MacDorman, Marian F.、Declercq, Eugene、Mathews, Thomas J.(2011)。United States home births increase 20 percent from 2004 to 2008。Birth,38,185-190。  new window
17.Christiaens, Wendy、Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne J.、De Vries, Raymond(2013)。Trends in the medicalisation of childbirth in Flanders and the Netherlands。Midwifery,29(1),e1-e8。  new window
18.Beckett, Katherine(2005)。Choosing cesarean: Feminism and the politics of childbirth in the United States。Feminist Theory,6(3),251-275。  new window
19.郭素珍(20150200)。從性別觀點看醫療化的婦女生產。護理雜誌,62(1),10-15。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.司晏芳(20140726)。想要好好生?產科照護新趨勢。康健雜誌,189。  延伸查詢new window
21.施麗雯(20151000)。臺灣的道德先鋒:焦慮、產檢選擇與責任的矛盾。科技、醫療與社會,21,77-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.施麗雯(20180600)。丹麥孕產照護:助產師和產科醫師共同照護模式。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,37(3),280-294。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.劉育志(20130626)。被告怕了!台灣婦產科醫師遭集體「殲滅」。商業週刊,2013(6月號)。  延伸查詢new window
24.蔡明松(2014)。理事長的話。台灣周產期醫學會會訊,214。  延伸查詢new window
25.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists(2005)。Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists, number 70, December 2005 (replaces Practice Bulletin number 62, May 2005)。Obstetrics and Gynecology,106,1453-1460。  new window
26.Benoit, Cecilia、Wrede, Sirpa、Bourgeault, Ivy Lynn、Sandall, Jane、De Vries, Raymond Gene、van Teijlingen, Edwin(2005)。Understanding the social organisation of maternity care systems: Midwifery as a touchstone。Sociology of Health and Illness,27(6),722-737。  new window
27.Benoit, Cecilia、Zadoroznyj, Maria、Hallgrimsdottir, Helga、Treloar, Adrienne、Taylor, Kara(2010)。Medical dominance and neoliberalisation in maternal care provision: The evidence from Canada and Australia。Social Science and Medicine,71(3),475-481。  new window
28.Bryant, Joanne、Porter, Maree、Tracy, Sally K.、Sullivan, Elizabeth A.(2007)。Caesarean birth: Consumption, safety, order, and good mothering。Social Science and Medicine,65(6),1192-1201。  new window
29.Dencker, Anna、Smith, Valerie、McCann, Colette、Begley, Cecily Marion(2017)。Midwife-led maternity care in Ireland--a retrospective cohort study。BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth,17(1)。  new window
30.Graham, Ernest M.、Petersen, Scott M.、Christo, Dana K.、Fox, Harold E.(2006)。Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury。Obstetrics and Gynecology,108,656-666。  new window
31.Hiddinga, Anja、Blume, Stuart S.(1992)。Technology, science, and obstetric practice: The origins and transformation of cephalopelvimetry。Science, Technology, and Human Values,17(2),154-179。  new window
32.Homer, Caroline S. E.(2016)。Models of maternity care: Evidence for midwifery continuity of care。The Medical Journal of Australia,205(8),370-374。  new window
33.Horton, Richard、Astudillo, Olaya(2014)。The power of midwifery。The Lancet,384(9948),1075-1076。  new window
34.Kitzinger, Sheila(2012)。Rediscovering the social model of childbirth。Birth,39(4),301-304。  new window
35.Kingdon, Carol、Singleton, Vicky、Gabbay, Mark、Lavender, Tina、Gyte, Gill、Neilson, Jim、Hart, Alyssa(2009)。Choice and birth method: Mixed-method study of caesarean delivery for maternal request。BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,116(7),886-895。  new window
36.Lazarus, Ellen S.(1994)。What do women want?: Issues of choice, control, and class in pregnancy and childbirth。Medical Anthropology Quarterly,8(1),25-46。  new window
37.McKay, Susan(1993)。Models of midwifery care: Denmark, Sweden, and the Netherlands。Journal of Nurse-Midwifery,38(2),114-120。  new window
38.Tracy, Sally K.、Hartz, Donna L.、Tracy, Mark B.、Allen, Jyai、Forti, Amanda、Hall, Bev、White, Jan、Lainchbury, Anne、Stapleton, Helen、Beckmann, Michael、Bisits, Andrew、Homer, Caroline、Foureur, Maralyn、Welsh, Alec、Kildea, Sue(2013)。Caseload midwifery care versus standard maternity care for women of any risk: M@NGO, a randomised controlled trial。The Lancet,382(9906),1723-1732。  new window
39.Vallgårda, Signild(1996)。Hospitalization of deliveries: The change of place of birth in Denmark and Sweden from the late nineteenth century to 1970。Medical History,40,173-196。  new window
40.Walsh, Denis(2010)。Childbirth embodiment: Problematic aspects of current understandings。Sociology of Health and Illness,32(3),486-501。  new window
41.Wernham, Ellie、Gurney, Jason、Stanley, James、Ellison-Loschmann, Lis、Sarfati, Diana(2016)。A comparison of midwife-led and medical-led models of care and their relationship to adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes: A retrospective cohort study in New Zealand。PLOS Medicine,13(9),e1002134。  new window
42.吳嘉苓(20101200)。臨床因素的消失:臺灣剖腹產研究的知識生產政治。臺灣社會學刊,45,1-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.李建南(2014)。發展本土化之友善生產模式及其成效評估研究(全程三年研究總報告) (計畫編號:DOH100-HP-1203)。  延伸查詢new window
2.許德耀(2013)。發展本土化之友善生產模式及其成效評估研究(101年後續擴充) (計畫編號:DOH101-HP-1204)。  延伸查詢new window
3.衛生福利部(2016)。101年家庭與生育調查報告研究計畫報告。  延伸查詢new window
4.衛生福利部(2017)。105年出生通報統計年報。台北:衛生福利部國民健康署。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Walsh, Denis(2007)。Evidence-Based Care for Normal Labour and Birth: A Guide for Midwives。Routledge。  new window
2.Haraway, Donna J.(1991)。Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature。New York:Routledge。  new window
3.Boston Women's Health Book Collective(1973)。Our Bodies, Ourselves: A Book By and For Women。New York:Simon and Schuster。  new window
4.Duden, Barbara(1993)。Disembodying women: Perspectives on pregnancy and the unborn。London:Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Martin, Emily(1989)。The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction。Boston:Beacon Press。  new window
6.Rothman, Barabar Katz(2016)。A bun in the oven: How the food and birth movements resist industrialization。New York University Press。  new window
7.Mol, Annemarie、吳嘉苓、陳嘉新、黃于玲、謝新誼、蕭昭君(2018)。照護的邏輯:比賦予病患選擇更重要的事。左岸文化。  延伸查詢new window
8.Clarke, Adele E.(1998)。Disciplining Reproduction: Modernity, American Life Sciences, and the Problems of Sex。University of California Press。  new window
其他
1.李昀澔(20140725)。產前簽計畫書.醫界民團看法相左,https://anntw.com/articles/20140724-iNKv。  延伸查詢new window
2.婦女新知基金會(2014)。母親不服從運動:秀出妳的生產計劃書,https://www.awakening.org.tw/news/3498。  延伸查詢new window
3.婦女新知基金會(2014)。拒絕過度醫療化,給我生產計劃書,http://www.tygh.mohw.gov.tw/?aid=302&pid=0&page_name=detail&iid=343。  延伸查詢new window
4.郭庚儒(20140724)。訂定生產計畫書?醫界批不平等契約,https://reurl.cc/VyZoN。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃筱珮(20161223)。溫柔革命/衛福部推醫師助產師共照計畫.滿意度99%卻僅有1家在做,http://www.peoplenews.tw/news/99837d0c-264c-4cf8-9459-1d431d1f4955。  延伸查詢new window
6.Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists(2017)。Group B streptococcus (GBS) in pregnancy and newborn babies,https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/patients/patientinformation-leaflets/pregnancy/pi-gbs-pregnancy-newborn.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.劉仲冬(1995)。國家政策下的女性身體。臺灣婦女處境白皮書:1995年。臺北:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.王秀雲、盧孳豔、吳嘉苓(2014)。性別與健康。台灣婦女處境白皮書:2014年。台北:女書。  延伸查詢new window
3.林文源(2018)。回應:作為在地實作的實用手冊。照護的邏輯:比賦予病患選擇更重要的事。台北:左岸。  延伸查詢new window
4.施麗雯(2014)。To Do or Not to Do?台灣懷孕女性與產前篩檢與檢測。科技社會人2:跨領域新挑戰。新竹:交通大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.謝新誼、吳嘉苓(20180000)。挑戰權威知識:臺灣的生產改革運動。臺灣社會福利運動與政策效應:2000-2018年。高雄:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Beck-Gernsheim, Elizabeth(1996)。Life as a planning project。Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology。London:Sage。  new window
7.Clarke, Adele E.、Shim, Janet、Mamo, Laura、Fosket, Jennifer Ruth、Fishman, Jennifer R.(2010)。Biomedicalization: Technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U. S. biomedicine。Biomedicalization: Technoscience, health, and illness in the US。Durham:Duke University Press。  new window
8.Rothman, Barabar Katz(1989)。The meanings of choice in reproductive technolog。Test-tube women: What future for motherhood?。London:Pandora Press。  new window
9.Rothman, Barabar Katz(2007)。A lifetime's labor: Women and power in the birthplace。Laboring on: Birth in transition in the United States。Routledge。  new window
10.Shih, Li-Wen(2018)。Moral bearing: The paradox of choice, anxiety and responsibility in Taiwan。Selective reproduction in the 21st century。Cham:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE