Text Coherence, Reading Ability, and Children's Scientific Understanding__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	Text Coherence, Reading Ability, and Children's Scientific Understanding
書刊名：	教育心理學報
作者：	連啟舜
作者(外文)：	Lien, Chi-shun
出版日期：	2013
卷期：	44:4
頁次：	頁875-904
主題關鍵詞：	文章連貫性；閱讀能力；閱讀理解；Reading ability；Reading comprehension；Text coherence
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1) 排除自我引用:1 共同引用:5 點閱:22

本研究之目的有三：（1）探討文章連貫性的改寫原則是否能有助於改善學童的文本；（2）文章連貫性的編寫原則是否有助於修改科學性的文本；（3）探討讀者閱讀能力和文章連貫性是否有交互作用存在。本研究選取兩篇科學性文章的自然文本，依據四個文章編修原則（論詞重複原則、概念清晰化原則、改變句子和段落順序原則及增加鉅觀結構）來進行改寫。受試者為91名國小六年級學生，依其閱讀能力分為高能力和低能力兩組，並隨機分派閱讀「原始版本」或「改編版本」。所有的受試者均接受「自由回憶」、「文本理解」和「推論理解」的測量。結果顯示：閱讀改編版本（連貫性高）學童的理解表現優於原始版本的學童。高能力的學童表現的較低能力的學童佳。閱讀能力和文章連貫性的交互作用效果發生於其中一篇文章推論層次的理解。此交互作用代表低能力的讀者在回答推論層次的問題時，獲益於文章連貫性的操弄，而高能力的讀者並沒有這樣的現象。本文最後就此一發現探討其教育上的應用。

以文找文

The purposes of this study were (1) to examine whether principles of revision that improve the coherence of text, which have been used successfully on texts for advanced readers, can also be used in revising young readers' texts; (2) to investigate whether the principles used to revise history texts can be applied to scientific texts and (3) to look at the interaction between text coherence and reading ability. Two authentic scientific texts (on diabetes and on pain) were revised according to four revision principles, providing argument-overlap, making implicit concepts explicit, changing order of sentences and paragraphs, and adding macro-structure to the text. Ninety-one 6^th-grade students were divided into low-ability and high-ability groups and randomly assigned to read either the original texts or the revised texts. Participants' comprehension was measured by free recall, questions assessing knowledge of the textbase (which assessed a shallow level of comprehension), and inference questions (which assessed a deep level of comprehension). Results indicated that young readers' comprehension was superior when the coherent version of the texts was read. High-ability readers performed better than low-ability readers. A significant interaction between text coherence and reading ability emerged on the inference questions for one of the texts. That is, low-ability readers' performance on the inference questions was better when the text was coherent, whereas high ability readers' performance was not improved by making the text coherent. Thus the text coherence affected the deep comprehension level of these low-ability readers. This finding is discussed in terms of its educational implications.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Barton, M. L.、Heidema, C.、Jordan, D.(2002)。Teaching reading in mathematics and science。Educational Leadership，60(3)，24-28。
2.	Beck, I. L.、McKeown, M. G.、Sinatra, G. M.、Loxterman, J. A.(1991)。Revising social-studies text from a text-processing perspective: Evidence of improved comprehensibility。Reading Research Quarterly，26(3)，251-276。
3.	Boscolo, P.、Mason, L.(2003)。Topic knowledge, text coherence, and interest: How they interact in learning from instructional texts。Journal of Experimental Education，71(2)，126-148。
4.	Britton, B. K.、Gulgoz, S.(1991)。Using Kintsch computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures。Journal of Educational Psychology，83，329-345。
5.	Britton, B. K.、Van Dusen, L.、Gulgoz, S.、Glynn, S. M.(1989)。Instructional texts rewritten by five expert teams: Revisions and retention improvements。Journal of Educational Psychology，81，225-239。
6.	Chambliss, M. J.(1994)。Evaluating the quality of textbooks for diverse learners。Remedial and Special Education，15，348-362。
7.	Duffy, T. M.、Higgins, L.、Mehlenbacher, B.、Cochran, C.、Wallace, D.、Hill, C.、Smith, S.(1989)。Models for the design of instructional text。Reading Research Quarterly，24，434-437。
8.	Graves, M. F.、Prenn, M. C.、Earle, J.、Thompson, M.、Johnson, V.、Slater, W. H.(1991)。Improving instructional text: Some lessons learned。Reading Research Quarterly，26，110-122。
9.	Kamalski, J.、Sanders, T.、Lentz, L.(2008)。Coherence marking, prior knowledge, and comprehension of informative and persuasive texts: Sorting things out。Discourse Processing，45，323-345。
10.	Lorch, R. F.、Lorch, E. P.(1996)。Effects of organizational signals on free recall of expository text。Journal of Educational Psychology，88(1)，38-48。
11.	Lehman, S.、Schraw, G.(2002)。Effects of coherence and relevance on shallow and deep text processing。Journal of Educational Psychology，94，738-750。
12.	Magliano, J. P.、Millis, K. K.(2004)。Assessing reading skill with a think-aloud procedure。Cognition and Instruction，21，251-283。
13.	Mckeown, M. G.、Beck, I. L.、Sinatra, G. M.、Loxterman, J. A.(1992)。The contribution of prior knowledge and coherent text to comprehension。Reading Research Quarterly，27，79-93。
14.	Meyer, B. J. F.(2003)。Text coherence and readability。Topics in Language Disorders，23(3)，204-222。
15.	Oakhill, J. V.(1993)。Children’s difficulties in reading comprehension。Educational Psychology Review，5，223-237。
16.	Sanders, T. J. M.、Noordman, L. G. M.(2000)。The role of coherence relations and their linguistic marker in text processing。Discourse Processes，29，37-60。
17.	Sawyer, M. H.(1991)。A review of research in revising instructional text。Journal of Reading Behavior，23，25-307。
18.	Shapiro, A. M.(2004)。How including prior knowledge as a subject variable may change outcomes of learning research。American Educational Research Journal，41，159-189。
19.	Su, Y. F.、Lin, C. S.(1992)。Effects of metacognitive training program on reading comprehension and metacognitive skills of sixth grade less skilled readers。Bulletin of Educational Psychology，25，245-267。
20.	Voss, J. F.、Silfles, L. N.(1996)。Learning from history text: The interaction of knowledge and comprehension skill with text structure。Cognition and Instruction，14，45-68。
21.	Linderholm, T.、Everson, M. G.、Van den Broek, P.、Mischinski, M.、Crittenden, A.、Samuels, J.(2000)。Effects of causal text revisions on more- and less-skilled readers' comprehension of easy and difficult texts。Cognition and Instruction，18(4)，525-556。
22.	O'Reilly, T.、McNamara, Danielle S.(2007)。Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: Good texts can be better for strategic, high-knowledge readers。Discourse Processes，43(2)，121-152。
23.	Meyer, Brandt J. F.、Brandt, D. M.、Bluth, G. J.(1980)。Use of top-level structure in text: key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students。Reading Research Quarterly，16(1)，72-103。
24.	McNamara, D. S.、Kintsch, W.(1996)。Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence。Discourse Processes，22(3)，247-288。
25.	荊溪昱(19950500)。中文國文教材的適讀性研究：適讀年級值的推估。教育研究資訊，3(3)，113-127。延伸查詢
26.	McNamara, D. S.、Kintsch, E.、Songer, N. B.、Kintsch, W.(1996)。Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text。Cognition and Instruction，14(1)，1-43。
27.	Bower, Gordon H.、Black, John B.、Turner, Terrence J.(1979)。Scripts in memory for text。Cognitive Psychology，11(2)，177-220。
28.	Mandler, Jean M.、Johnson, Nancy S.(1977)。Remembrance of things passed: Story structure and recall。Cognitive Psychology，9，111-151。
29.	Mangliano, J. P.、Trabasso, T.、Graesser, A. C.(1999)。Strategic processing during comprehension。Journal of Educational Psychology，91(4)，615-629。
30.	Gilabert, R.、Martínez, G.、Vidal-Abarca, E.(2005)。Some good texts are always better: Text revision to foster inferences of readers with high and low prior background knowledge。Learning and Instruction，15(1)，45-68。
31.	Graesser, A. C.、Millis, K. K.、Zwaan, R. A.(1997)。Discourse comprehension。Annual Review of Psychology，48(1)，163-189。
32.	Vidal-Abarca, E.、Martinez, G.、Gilabert, R.(2000)。Two procedures to improve instructional text: Effects on memory and learning。Journal of Educational Psychology，92(1)，107-116。
33.	Cook, L. K.、Mayer, R. E.(1988)。Teaching readers about the structure of scientific text。Journal of Educational Psychology，80(4)，448-456。
34.	Dole, Janice A.、Duffy, Gerald G.、Roehler, Laura R.、Pearson, P. David(1991)。Moving from the Old to the New: Research on Reading Comprehension Instruction。Review of Educational Research，61(2)，239-264。
35.	Kintsch, W.(1994)。Text comprehension, memory and learning。American Psychologist，49(4)，294-303。
36.	Bransford, J. D.、Johnson, M. K.(1972)。Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension。Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior，11(6)，717-726。
37.	Graesser, A. C.、Singer, M.、Trabasso, T.(1994)。Constructing Inferences during Narrative Text Comprehension。Psychological Review，101(3)，371-395。
38.	Kintsch, Walter(1988)。The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model。Psychological Review，95(2)，163-182。
39.	Kintsch, W.、Van Dijk, T. A.(1978)。Toward a model of text comprehension and production。Psychological Review，85(5)，363-394。
40.	Oakhill, Jane(1984)。Inferential and memory skills in children's comprehension of stories。British Journal of Educational Psychology，54(1)，31-39。
41.	Ericsson, K. A.、Kintsch, W.(1995)。Long-term working Memory。Psychological Review，102(2)，211-245。
42.	Beck, I. L.、McKeown, M. G.、Gromoll, E. W.(1989)。Learning from social studies texts。Cognition and Instruction，6(2)，99-158。

會議論文
1.	Tzeng, Y.、Chen, P.、Chen, M.(2006)。Children’s comprehension of narratives with causal but without anaphoric coherence。The Sixteen Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse。Minneapolis, MN。

圖書
1.	Britton, B. K.、Woodward, A.、Binkley, M.(1993)。Learning from textbooks: Theory and practice。Hillsdale, NJ：Erlbaum。
2.	Chall, J. S.、Conard, S. S.(1991)。Should textbooks challenge students?。New York, NY：Teachers College Press。
3.	Chambliss, M. J.(2002)。The characteristics of well-designed science textbooks。Psychology of science text comprehension。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。
4.	Davison, A.(1984)。Readability-appraising text difficulty。Learning to read in American school: Basal readers and content texts。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。
5.	Graesser, A. C.、Leon, J. A.、Otero, J.(2002)。Introduction to the psychology of science text comprehension。Psychology of science text comprehension。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。
6.	Graesser, A. C.、McNamara, D. S.、Louwerse, M. M.(2003)。What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text?。Rethinking reading comprehension。New York, NY：Guilford Press。
7.	Kang, Hsuan(2006)。Science and life technology。Taipei, R.O.C.：Kang Hsuan Educational Publishing Group。
8.	Ko, H.(1999)。The reading difficulty diagnostic test。Taipei, R.O.C：The Special Education Group of the Ministry of Education。
9.	RAND Reading Study Group.(2002)。Reading for understanding。Santa Monica, CA：RAND。
10.	van den Broek, P.(1990)。Causal inferences and the comprehension of narrative texts。Inferences and text comprehension。San Diego, CA：Academic Press。
11.	Just, Marcel Adam、Carpenter, Patricia A.(1987)。The Psychology of Reading and Language Comprehension。Allyn and Bacon。
12.	Bartlett, Frederic Charles(1932)。Remembering: A Study in Experimental and social Psychology。Cambridge University Press。
13.	Perfetti, C. A.(1985)。Reading ability。Oxford University Press。
14.	Kintsch, Walter(1998)。Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition。Cambridge University Press。
15.	van Dijk, Teun Adrianus、Kintsch, Walter(1983)。Strategies of discourse comprehension。Academic Press。

圖書論文
1.	Britton, B. K.、Gulgoz, S.、Glynn, S. M.(1993)。Impact of good and poor writing on learners: Research and theory。Learning from textbooks: Theory and practice。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。
2.	Brown, A. L.(1982)。Learning how to learn from reading。Reader meets author/bridging the gap: A psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspective。International Reading Association。
3.	Goldman, S. R.、Bisanz, G. L.(2002)。Toward a functional analysis of scientific genres: Implications for understanding and learning processes。The Psychology of Science Text Comprehension。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。
4.	Kintsch, W.、Vipond, D.(1979)。Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice and psychological theory。Perspectives on memory research: Essays in honor of Uppsala University's 500th anniversary。Hillsdale, NJ：Erlbaum。
5.	Oakhill, J. V.、Yuill, N.(1996)。Higher order factors in comprehension disability: Processes and remediation。Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and Intervention。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。
6.	van den Broek, P.(1994)。Comprehension and memory for narrative texts: Inferences and coherence。Handbook of psycholinguistics。New York, NY：Academic。
7.	van den Broek, P.、Young, M.、Tzeng, Y.、Linderholm, T.(1999)。The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of a memory representation。The construction of mental representations during reading。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum。
8.	Vygotsky, L. S.(1963)。Learning and mental development at school age。Educational psychology in the U.S.S.R.。London：Routledge & Kegan Paul。
9.	van den Broek, Paulus Willem、Kremer, Kathleen E.(2000)。The mind in action: What it means to comprehend during reading。Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades。International Reading Association。
10.	Rumelhart, D. E.(1975)。Notes on a schema for stories。Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science。New York, NY：Academic Press。
11.	Baker, L.、Brown, A. L.(1984)。Metacognitive skills and reading。Handbook of Reading Research。New York, NY：Longman。
12.	Anderson, Richard C.、Pearson, P. D.(1984)。A Schema-Theoretic View of Basic Processes in Reading Comprehension。Handbook of reading research。New York, NY：Longman。
13.	Trabasso, T.、Secco, T.、Van den Broek, P. W.(1984)。Causal cohesion and story coherence。Learning and comprehension of text。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	編製及確信準則對企業社會責任報告書可讀性之影響
2.	配合國小課程單元科普讀物人工分級推薦與系統可讀性分析之差異研究
3.	國中地理科教科書文本結構類型與複雜度分析
4.	文章連貫性和人稱敘寫觀點對兒童道德故事主題理解之影響
5.	中文文本可讀性探討：指標選取、模型建立與效度驗證
6.	以適讀性公式挑選英文讀本之探究
7.	中文國文教材的適讀性研究: 適讀年級值的推估

1.	診斷式的適讀性評估系統：以小學文本探討四種模式的比較研究
2.	先前知識與文章連貫性對國小學童閱讀理解之影響

1.	從中文閱讀理解看數學文字題題意之閱讀理解

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫