筆者自2007至2009年籌創國立臺灣師範大學國際漢學研究所，因緣接觸日、韓漢學者，遂開始關注兩國學者對於《易》學研究的文獻與成果，積蓄了基本的材料。自2011年9月至2012年8月，客座講學於首爾「韓國外國語大學校中國學部」，得與韓國漢學者認識交流，並參觀成均館大學校「尊經閣」、首爾國立大學「奎章閣」與安東「韓國國學振興院」等重要典藏機構。此外，透過學習韓國語文與閱讀相關書籍，逐漸瞭解韓國歷史文化與宋明理學思想的發展脈絡。因此，本文以成均館大學校「大東文化研究院」於1996年複印原典出版之《韓國經學資料集成》第七、八輯《易經》，總37大冊為研究文本，此套集成搜羅現存朝鮮李氏王朝（1392－1910）儒者對於《周易》研究的傳世成果，筆者欲藉以奠定深入探討的基礎，復與京畿道翰林大學泰東研究所嚴連錫教授商論後，將此37冊《易》學論述，依其性質概分為三類，以利檢索：一、朱子《易》學類；二、義理《易》學類；三、象數《易》學類。要之，本文主要探討朝鮮李氏王朝《易》學的淵源流傳，並進行整體的文獻分類，也詳細介紹現今中、韓《易》學學術交流情形，既能使學界瞭解韓國歷代《易》學研究發展的史略，同時也指引學者未來研究的途徑，具有相當的學術意義與貢獻。

From 2007 to 2009, in order to establish Graduate Institute of International Sinology in National Taiwan Normal University, I contacted with many Japanese and Korean scholars who studied Confucianism. During the time, I collected a great deal of research materials regarding Japanese and Korean studies of Confucianism. According to the chance, I became particularly interested in the condition of the research of The Yi-jing among Japanese and Korean scholars. From 2011.9 to 2012.8, I held a visiting professorship in the Department of Chinese, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies (HUFS). I therefore had the honor of making friends with Korean scholars, visiting important academic institutions such as Zunjing-Gak in Chengjunguan University and Gueizhang-Gak in Seoul National University. At the same time, I also picked up some Korean language in HUFS, and got acquainted with Korean history and culture, which, as I gradually realized, were closely connected with Chinese Confucianism of the Song and the Ming Dynasties. Having been aware of the interconnected development in Classical Chinese and Korean culture, I therefore set forth a research on the Korean Yi-jing studies in Joseon Li-Dynasty (1392-1910). This paper deals with the Yi-jing section from Collections of Korean Classics, which was published in 1996 by Datung Cultural Institute in Chengjunguan University. The Yi-jing collection, 37 volumes in total, represents comprehensively the achievement of Korean Confucian studies over a long period (the whole Joseon Li-Dynasty). After discussions with Professor Yen Lian-xik, I divide the whole collection into three parts: Yixue of Zhu-xi, Xiangshu and Yili. In addition to the introduction and classification of the Korean classical studies of The Yi-jing, this paper also provides a picture of contemporary scholarly exchange of the Yi-jing studies between Korea and Taiwan. I hope the undertakings can contribute to a better understanding of Korean scholarship and, more specifically, to our research on The Yi-jing in the future.