:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:考慮碳效益與輻射能量收支下森林最適輪伐期與林地期望值之實證分析
書刊名:農業經濟叢刊
作者:曾憲郎 引用關係魏惠君
作者(外文):Chin, Shan-nonWei, Hui-chun
出版日期:2014
卷期:20:1
頁次:頁33-66
主題關鍵詞:最適輪伐期林地期望值二氧化碳吸存量地表反照率碳效益輻射能量收支Optimal rotationLand expectation valuesCarbon sequestrationSurface albedoCarbon benefitsRadiation budget
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:31
由於過量的人造溫室氣體排放,全球正積極制訂法規希望減緩氣候變遷的速率,其中森林扮演著相當重要的角色,對森林所提供的碳吸存貢獻,給予碳價格給付為一重要的政策方向。若僅考慮森林固碳作用的效益,而忽略地表反照率的影響,可能明顯高估森林碳吸存的效果,因比起已開墾的土地,森林的低地表反照率特性可能使地球吸收更多熱能,不過,森林所吸收的能量有部份會轉存為化學能,並不完全以熱能型式散失。因此,本研究模擬在考慮森林的碳效益下,額外納入輻射能量收支等值碳量的影響,來探究杉木的最適輪伐期與林地期望值之變化。據本研究之實證結果,若存在碳價格機制,隨著碳價格的增加,最適輪伐期會延長,林地期望值也會上升,若再加上輻射能量收支等值碳量的影響,則最適輪伐期會稍微縮短,抵減森林部份的固碳作用,針對「僅有木材收益」、「木材及碳效益」、「木材、碳效益及輻射能量收支等值碳量」三種情境下之最適輪伐期(T、T_(cs)、T_(tecs))做比較,其關係為T_(cs)大於等於T_(tecs),而T_(tecs)大於等於T。
International efforts strive to mitigate the rate of climate change caused by man-made greenhouse gas emissions. Attributing an economical value to forest carbon sequestration might represent an important strategy to achieve such goals. Such a policy is likely to impact optimal rotation periods in forestry management. However, accounting for carbon sequestration alone is not sufficient; the lower surface albedo of forests, compared to converted land, causes a higher grade of heat absorption, which negatively affects the policy value of forests. Yet due to photosynthesis, not all of the absorbed energy is converted to heat, but partially used as chemical energy. Thus, this paper discusses the optimum rotation periods and land expectation values of Cunninghamia lanceolata under the impact of carbon sequestration and the mentioned radiation budget. The findings suggest that in the presence carbon sequestration pricing, the optimal rotation periods and land expectation values ought to increase proportionally to carbon prices. The optimal rotation periods of three different scenarios is compared: "just a timber (T)," "timber and carbon benefits (T_(cs))," and "timber、carbon and carbon equivalent of radiation budget (T_(tecs))". The relation between them is: T_(cs) is greater than or equal to T_(tecs); T_(tecs) is greater than or equal to T.
期刊論文
1.劉浚明(19970300)。疏伐作業影響輪伐期長短之研究。中華林學季刊,30(1)=116,71-84。  延伸查詢new window
2.林俊成、鄭美如、劉淑芬、李國忠(20020900)。全民造林運動二氧化碳吸存潛力之經濟效益評估。臺灣林業科學,17(3),311-321。  延伸查詢new window
3.柳婉郁、盧又銘、林國慶(20091200)。同時考慮碳價格與木材價格不確定下最適輪伐期之決定。農業經濟叢刊,15(1),115-145。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.洪富文、孫正春、黃松根(19850500)。蓮華池地區不同林齡杉木林地上部生物量之分佈。臺灣省林業試驗所試驗報告,444,1-12。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳利軍、劉高煥、勵惠國(2002)。中國植被淨第一性生產力遙感動態監測。遙感學報,6(2),129-136。  延伸查詢new window
6.馬子斌、陳政靜、熊如珍、黃清吟、陳欣欣、翟思湧(1992)。重要商用木材之一般性質。臺灣省林業試驗所林業叢刊,1(1)。  延伸查詢new window
7.秦建華、姜志林(1996)。杉木林生物量及其分配的變化規律。生態學雜誌,15(1),1-7。  延伸查詢new window
8.鮑平勇、張友靜、貢璐、竺建平(2007)。由遙感數據獲取的地表反照率歸一化問題探討。河海大學學報(自然科學版),35(1),67-71。  延伸查詢new window
9.Bala, G.、Caldeira, K.、Wickett, M.、Phillips, T. J.、Lobell, D. B.、Delire, C.、Mirin, A.(2007)。Combined Climate and Carbon-Cycle Effects of Large-Scale Deforestation。The National Academy of Science of the U.S.A.,104(16),6550-6555。  new window
10.Betts, R. A.(2000)。Offset of the Potential Carbon Sink from Boreal Forestation by Decreases in Surface Albedo。Nature,408,187-190。  new window
11.Curry, J. A.、Schramm, J. L.、Ebert, E. E.(1995)。Sea-Ice Albedo Climate Feedback Mechanism。Journal of Climate,8(2),240-247。  new window
12.Dixon, R. K.、Andrasko, K. J.、Sussman, F. G.、Lavinson, M. A.、Trexler, M. C.、Vinson, T. S.(1993)。Forest Sector Carbon Offset Projects: Near-Term Opportunities to Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions。Water, Air, and Soil Pollution,70,561-577。  new window
13.Englin, J.、Callaway, J. M.(1993)。Global Climate Change and Optimal Forest Management。Natural Resource Modeling,7,191-202。  new window
14.Faustmann, M.(1995)。Calculation of the Value Which Forestland and Immature Stands Possess for Forestry。Journal of Forest Economics,1(1),7-44。  new window
15.Myhre, G.、Highwood, E. J.、Shine, K.、Stordal, F.(1998)。New Estimates of Radiative Forcing Due to Well Mixed Greenhouse Gases。Geophysical Resource Letter,25(14),2715-2718。  new window
16.Pietro, W. J.(2009)。Ethanol as an Alternative Fuel for Automobiles。Journal of Chemical Education,86(5),579-581。  new window
17.Plantinga, A. J.、Birdsey, R. A.(1994)。Optimal Forest Stand Management when Benefits are Derived from Carbon。Natural Resource Modeling,8(4),373-387。  new window
18.Stainback, G. A.、Alavalapati, R. R.(2002)。Economic Analysis of Slach Pine Forest Carbon Sequestration in the Southern U.S.。Journal of Forest Economics,8(2),105-117。  new window
19.Thompson, M. P.、Adamsand, D.、Sessions, J.(2009)。Radiative Forcing and the Optimal Rotation Age。Ecological Economics,65(10),2713-2720。  new window
20.林俊成、李國忠、林裕仁(19990300)。柳杉人工林碳貯存效果與適應成本研究。國立臺灣大學農學院實驗林研究報告,13(1)=223,51-60。  延伸查詢new window
21.陳麗琴(19870900)。杉木原木最適造材之經濟分析。林業試驗所研究報告季刊,2(3),227-240。  延伸查詢new window
22.陳麗琴、黃進睦(19920900)。Weibull機率密度函數於蓮華池杉木人工林原木經濟價值之研究。林業試驗所研究報告季刊,7(3),221-230。  延伸查詢new window
23.劉浚明、鍾旭和(19930600)。臺灣杉非線性收穫模式之建立。中華林學季刊,26(2)=102,39-49。  延伸查詢new window
24.羅天祥、趙士洞(1997)。中國杉木林生物生產力格局及其數學模型。植物生態學報,21(5),403-415。  延伸查詢new window
25.Chang, S. J.(1982)。An Economic Analysis of Forest Taxation's Impact on Optimal Rotation Age。Land Economics,58(3),310-323。  new window
26.Chang, S. J.(1983)。Rotation Age, Management Intensity, and the Economic Factors of Timber Production: Do Changes in Stumpage Price, Interest Rate, Regeneration Cost, and Forest Taxation Matter?。Forest Science,29(2),267-278。  new window
27.Klemperer, W. D.(1977)。Forest Income Valuation Revisited。Real Estate Appraiser,43(1),18-24。  new window
28.Koskela, E.(1989)。Forest Taxation and Timber Supply under Price Uncertainty: Credit Rationing in Capital Markets。Forest Science,35(1),160-172。  new window
29.Koskela, E.、Ollikainen, M.(2001)。Forest Taxation and Rotation Age under Private Amenity Valuation: New Results。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,42(3),374-384。  new window
30.Sedjo, R. A.(1989)。Forest to Offset the Greenhouse Effect。Journal of Forestry,87(7),12-15。  new window
31.Van Kooten, G. C.、Binkley, C. S.、Delcourt, G.(1995)。Effect of Carbon Taxes and Subsidies on Optimal Forest Rotation Age and Supply of Carbon Services。American Journal of Agricultural Economics,77(2),365-374。  new window
32.Hartman, Richard(1976)。The Harvesting Decision When a Standing Forest Has Value。Economic Inquiry,14(1),52-58。  new window
33.李國忠、林俊成、陳麗琴(20000300)。臺灣杉人工林碳吸存潛力及其成本效益分析。臺灣林業科學,15(1),115-123。  延伸查詢new window
34.林國慶、柳婉郁(20071200)。考慮碳吸存價格下最適輪伐期與土地期望價之實證分析。農業經濟叢刊,13(1),1-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.鄭欽龍(2010)。國有林林木經營區因應減碳政策之最適經營規劃 (計畫編號:tfbm-980215)。台灣大學森林暨資源學系。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kimmins, J. P.(1987)。Forest Ecology。New York:Macmillan Publishing。  new window
其他
1.Reuther, Thomson(2015)。Carbon Market Daily: Point Carbon,http://crf.thomsonreuters.com/news/cmd/。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hoen, H. F.、Solberg, B.(1997)。Carbon Dioxide Taxing, Timber Rotations, and Market Implications。Economics of Carbon Sequestration in Forestry。Boca Raton, Fl:CRC Press。  new window
2.Maclaren, J. P.(1996)。Plantation Forestry-Its Role as a Carbon Sink: Conclusions from Calculations Based on New Zealand's Planted Forest Estate。Forest Ecosystems, Forest Management and the Global Carbon Cycle。Berlin:Springer-Verlag。  new window
3.Sedio, R. A.、Solomon, A.(1989)。Climate and Forests。Greenhouse Warming: Abatement and Adaptation。Washington, D.C.:Resources for the Future。  new window
4.Watson, R. T.、Noble, I. R.、Bolin, B.、Ravindranath, N. H.、Verardo, D. J.、Dokken, D. J.(2000)。Land Use, Land Use Change, and Forestry 2000。Summary for Policymakers。Geneva:Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE