臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：農業環境給付政策之研究--以有機稻米與水稻田為例
書刊名：農業與經濟
作者：許家勝／陳吉仲 引用關係／柳婉郁 引用關係／廖述誼
作者(外文)：Hsu, Chia-sheng／Chen, Chi-chung／Liu, Wan-yu／Liao, Shu-yi
出版日期：2014
卷期：53
頁次：頁55-92
主題關鍵詞：農業政策；環境給付；有機稻米；水稻田；Agriculture policy；Environmental services payment；Organic rice；Rice paddy field
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:13
  • 點閱點閱:438
農業環境給付政策係結合農業生產與環境保護概念之農業政策，其目的除了保護和改善農業環境，更重要的是取得農業生產活動與自然資源使用之平衡，以尋求農業發展與自然環境永續共存之雙贏局面，因此本研究透過將農業生產時所產生正面外部效益內部化，來研擬未來可行之國內農業環境給付措施，藉以鼓勵農民從事環境友善之農業生產活動。本研究根據研究結果提出以下相關政策建議：（1）就水稻田農業環境給付措施而言，因水稻田會產生許多環境正面效益，根據其正面效益估算而得之環境給付金額為每公頃每期39,000元。值得一提的是，在此政策推行之前必須先調整現行的保價收購政策，以避免造成給予同一筆農地雙重補貼的不公平現象，因此建議初期解決方式為給予稻農自由選擇此兩種方式之權利，亦即稻農可選擇參加保價收購或者是參加農業環境給付，但就長期而言，建議政府應逐步以農業環境給付措施取代保價收購政策，以符合因應貿易自由化的境內支持措施原則；（2）就有機稻米農業環境給付措施而言，本研究係根據農民轉作有機稻米可能產生之收益損失來計算給付金額，藉以增加農民由非有機轉為有機生產之經濟誘因。以有機水稻耕作為例，當每公頃每期的補助金額達到26,000元時，農民就有誘因從事有機水稻生產，同時為鼓勵農民持續從事有機生產，轉型後之每公頃每期補助金額約為20,000元。此外，有機農生產會對生態環境產生正面的效果，對消費者的健康亦會產生正面的助益，由於這些效益將可能遠超過以收益損失概念計算而得之補助金額，因此建議政府應積極鼓勵農民從事有機農業生產活動。
The main goal of the payment for environmental services policy is to create a win-win situation for sustainable agricultural development and natural resource protection by promoting environment-friendly production activities. Based on the scopes and economic values of environmental services, we first estimated the values of the positive externalities associated with agricultural production, and then designed feasible policy instruments for the conduction of the environmental services payment program in Taiwan. We concluded with two important policy suggestions: (1) Rice paddy fields can provide many positive externalities to the human society and the natural ecosystem. To account for the positive externalities, the estimated environmental services payment for rice paddy fields is about NT$39,000 per acreage for each growing season. However, the government should adjust current rice price support policy to avoid double subsidies on the same rice paddy field before the implementation of the environmental services payment program. To resolve this issue, the government can offer the farmers to choose freely between these two types of subsidy in the early implementing stage. In the long run, however, the government needs to gradually eliminate price support for rice to meet the requirements of international free trade agreement; (2) A case study on the environmental services payment for organic rice farming reveals that farmers will be willing to adopt organic production methods when the amount of subsidies is greater than NT$26,000 per acreage for each growing season. After the transforming period, the amount of subsidies can be reduced to NT$20,000 per acreage for each growing season to support the continuation of organic production. Because organic farming has significant positive effects on natural ecosystems and general public health, implementation of environmental services payment program for agricultural production is important for future sustainable agricultural development and natural resources and environment protection.
期刊論文
1.Nijkamp, P.、Vindigni, G.、Nunes, P. A. L. D.(2008)。Economic Valuation of Biodiversity: A Comparative Study。Ecological Economics，67，217-231。  new window
2.李俊霖、李俊鴻(20120600)。農地轉用對生態系統服務功能衝擊之經濟評估。農業經濟叢刊，17(2)，111-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.曾偉君、李欣恩(20051200)。臺灣水稻田之糧食安全及景觀價值。農業經濟半年刊，78，39-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林孟輝、王雲平(20071200)。有機水稻產銷經營管理。桃園區農業專訊，62，46-49。  延伸查詢new window
5.肖玉、謝高地(2009)。上海市郊稻田生態系統服務綜合評價。資源科學，31，38-47。  延伸查詢new window
6.周錫躍、李鳳博、徐春春、方福(2009)。浙江稻田人工濕地生態系統服務價值評估。浙江農業科學，5，971-974。  延伸查詢new window
7.蔡昇甫(20040200)。水田之功能與效益評析。農田水利，50(10)，10-17。  延伸查詢new window
8.蔡明華(20080601)。臺灣水田灌溉農業之三生功能價值。豐年半月刊，58(11)，26-30。  延伸查詢new window
9.Birol, E.、Karousakis, K.、Koundouri, P.(2006)。Using a Choice Experiment to Account for Preference Heterogeneity in Wetland Attributes: The Case of Cheimaditida Wetland in Greece。Ecological Economics，60，145-156。  new window
10.Chomitz, Kenneth M.、Brenes, Esteban、Constantino, Luis(1999)。Financing Environmental Services: The Costa Rican Experience and Its Implications。The Science of the Total Environment，240，157-169。  new window
11.Engel, S.、Pagiola, S.、Wunder, S.(2008)。Designing Payments for Environmental Service in Theory and Practice: An Overview of the Issues。, Ecological Economics，65，663-674。  new window
12.Feng, H.(2007)。Green Payments and Dual Policy Goals。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management，3，323-335。  new window
13.Ferraro, P. J.、Pattanayak, S.(2006)。Money for Nothing? A Call for Empirical Evaluation of Biodiversity Conservation Investments。PLoS Biology，4(4)，105。  new window
14.Liu, C. W.、Zhang, S. W.、Yao, H. P.、Lin, H. K.、Lin, W. T.(2010)。Appraisal of Affordable Green Subsidy of Rice Paddy in Taiwan。Paddy Water Environ，8，207-216。  new window
15.Pretty, J. N.、Brett, C.、Gee, D.、Hine, R. E.、Mason, C. F.、Morison, J. I. L.、van der Bijl, G.(2000)。An Assessment of the Total External Costs of UK Agriculture。Agricultural Systems，65，113-136。  new window
16.Randall, Alan(20031200)。Pricing the Outputs of Multifunctional Agriculture。農業經濟叢刊，9(1)，1-29。  new window
17.Stolze, M.、Lampkin, N.(2009)。Policy for Organic Farming: Rationale and Concepts。Food Policy，34，237-244。  new window
18.Woodward, R. T.、Wui, Y.-S.(2001)。The Economic Value of Wetland Services: A Meta-Analysis。Ecological Economics，37(2)，257-270。  new window
19.丁全孝、李超運(19980600)。水稻有機栽培之推廣與展望。花蓮區農業專訊，24，7-10。  延伸查詢new window
20.Babcock, B. A.、Lakshminarayan, P. G.、Wu, J.、Zilberman, D.(1997)。Targeting Tools for the Purchase of Environmental Amenities。Land Economics，73(3)，325-329。  new window
研究報告
1.陳郁蕙、陳建宏、吳榮杰(2005)。臺灣稻米政策調整之模擬評估--農民休耕傾向分析。台北：台灣農村經濟學會。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳富春(2003)。水田生態環境及微氣候模式。台北：國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學系。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳富春(2004)。水田生態環境微氣候模式及二氧化碳流通量模式分析。台北：國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學系。  延伸查詢new window
4.葉一隆(2006)。水田休耕蓄水推廣與生態功能評估。屏東：國立屏東科技大學災害防救科技研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉振宇(2007)。水田三生功能分析及經濟效益評估。台北：國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學系。  延伸查詢new window
6.譚智宏(2004)。水田於農業及都會區域溫度和緩之評估。桃園：財團法人農業工程研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
7.曾憲郎(1998)。地層下陷的社會成本評估CVM與HPM結合之應用補助計畫成果報告書。台北：經濟部水利署。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.姚星賓(2007)。以水稻田多功能觀點評估合理綠色補貼(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林英傑(2002)。關渡自然公園水稻田生態經營之環境與教育經濟效益分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.徐玉玶(2001)。台灣有機稻米生產成本分析(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.國立臺灣大學水工試驗所(2006)。區域淹水損失圖建立前期計畫--93、94年颱風豪雨及災損調查分析。台北：經濟部水利署。  延伸查詢new window
2.梁啟源、郭博堯、劉致峻(2003)。再生能源發展方案之社會成本效益分析。台北：財團法人國家政策研究基金會。  延伸查詢new window
3.European Union(2005)。Agri-Environment Measures - Overview on General Principles, Types of Measures, and Application, European Commission Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development。Brussels, Belgium：European Commission Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development Press。  new window
4.European Union(2007)。Rural Development in the European Union -Statistical and Economic Information Report 2007。Brussels, Belgium：European Commission Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development Press。  new window
5.European Union(2011)。Rural Development in the European Union-tatistical and Economic Information Report 2011。Brussels, Belgium：Commission Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development Press。  new window
6.Just, R. E.、Hueth, D. L.、Schmitz, A.(2005)。The Welfare Economic of Public Policy: A Practical Approach to Project and Policy Evaluation。Cheltenham, UK：Edward Elgar Press。  new window
7.Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries(2012)。FY2011 Annual Report on Food, Agriculture and Rural Areas in Janpan。Tokyo, Japan：MAFF Press。  new window
8.OECD(2008)。Evaluation of Agricultural Policy Reforms in Korea。Paris：OECD Press。  new window
9.Pagiola, S.、Platais, G.(2007)。Payments for Environmental Services: From Theory to Practice。Washington：World Bank Press。  new window
10.Schwarz, G.、Nieberg, H.、Sanders, J.(2010)。Organic Farming Support Payments in the EU。Braunschweig, Germany：vTI Agriculture and Forestry Research Press。  new window
11.Stolze, M.、Piorr, A.、Häring, A.、Dabbert, S.(2000)。Organic Farming in Europe: Economics and Policy. vol. 6: Environmental Impacts of Organic Farming in Europe。Stuttgart, Germany：Prof Dr Stephan Dabbert Press。  new window
12.Tietenberg, T.(2006)。Environmental and Natural Resource Economics。Boston：Addison-Wesley Press。  new window
13.Wunder, Sven(2005)。Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Bolts。CIFOR。  new window
其他
1.行政院農業委員會(2000)。農業統計年報，http://agrstat.coa.gov.tw/sdweb/public/book/Book.aspx。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院農委會網站(2013)。農業統計年報，http://agrstat.coa.gov.tw/sdweb/public/book/Book.aspx， 2013/09/16。  延伸查詢new window
3.行政院農業委員會(1999)。農業統計年報，http://agrstat.coa.gov.tw/sdweb/public/book/Book.aspx。  延伸查詢new window
4.行政院農業委員會(2002)。農業統計年報，http://agrstat.coa.gov.tw/sdweb/public/book/Book.aspx。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：384（臺灣：376，外國：8） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1541412 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67350506
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上