當前許多國家在全球化資本主義與國際化潮流中，採取高等教育評鑑制度來進行大學的品質管控，過去十年中，我國也非常積極在大學中實施高等教育評鑑。本文主要採取批判的觀點衡量台灣高等教育評鑑制度的問題，此制度有利或有礙於大學的創意發展，值得一探究竟。本文首先說明我國高教評鑑的背景與實施狀況，並指出此制度可能連帶的負面意涵，本文認為目前高等教育及其對於品質的理解可能有些問題，受到牽制的評鑑制度，反而可能阻礙大學創意的發想。最後本文在結論中指出，評鑑制度應該更開放，並且將大學視為一個實踐各種可能性的社群，也是一個不斷在進行創造的社群，如此方能促成大學成為更具創意的大學。

In the current era of global capitalism and internationalization， several countries have resorted to higher education evaluation systems to implement quality control in universities. Over the past decade Taiwan has actively participated in enforcing higher education evaluation of all of its universities. This study critically assesses the higher education evaluation system used in Taiwan to establish whether it improves or impedes the quality of creativity in universities. The background and present application of the system are introduced， followed by a thorough evaluation of the negative aspects of this system. This study problematizes the present concept of higher education and its approach to quality， which could be considered to impede rather than improve creativity. This study concludes that the evaluation system must be open and coordinated with the involved university acting as a community of possibility， a community in the making; thus， a more creative university.