美國的宗教土地使用--國會的立法與法院的判例__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	美國的宗教土地使用--國會的立法與法院的判例
書刊名：	臺灣國際研究季刊
作者：	施正鋒
作者(外文)：	Shih, Cheng-feng
出版日期：	2016
卷期：	12:1
頁次：	頁135-175
主題關鍵詞：	宗教土地使用；宗教自由；土地徵收；判例；Religious land use；Freedom of religion；Eminent domain；RLUIPA；Court cases
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:82

在這裡，我們想要透過美國國會的立法、以及各級法院的判例，來了解政府對於宗教土地使用的作法；具體而言，我們想要知道，當地方政府的土地管制、甚至於徵收侵犯到人民的宗教自由之際，國會及法院採取怎麼樣的態度。我們先將了解土地對於宗教信仰的重要性、以及反對立法保障宗教土地使用的理由；接著，我們要回顧美國國會與聯邦最高法院針對這個議題的長期拔河；再來，我們要介紹RLUIPA的內容，特別是關鍵的概念；其次，我們將探討土地使用法規涉及是否包含土地徵收；在結語之前，我們要考察一些在RLUIPA立法以後的判例。

以文找文

In this article, we explore how the American government has dealt with the issues of religious land use through Congressional legislations and judicial interpretations by court cases. Specifically, we look into how the legislative and the judicial branches have expressed themselves when religious lands are taken by the local government via eminent domain and whether the peoples’ freedom of religion of the people has been infringed. We shall start with an understanding of the importance of lands to freedom of religion and the rationales underlying the oppositions against any attempts at regulating religious land uses. After reviewing the tug-of-war between Congress and the Supreme Court on this issue over the years, we shall introduce the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) passed in 2000 with a special focus on some key concepts. In addition, we will examine whether eminent domain is under the jurisdiction of land use regulations. Before we come to the conclusions, we will also investigate some court cases after the promulgation of the RLUIPA.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	陳韋鑑(20120615)。南屯天主堂，每月打卡抗議重劃。台灣教會公報。延伸查詢
2.	陳振貴(2012)。支持526南屯天主堂遊行祈福。天主教博愛會刊，78。延伸查詢
3.	傅恩平(20001210)。馬赫俊神父2000年台灣紀行。台灣教會公報，2545。延伸查詢
4.	Alden, Bram(2010)。Reconsidering RLUIPA: Do Religious Land Use Protections Really Benefit Religious Land Users?。UCLA Law Review，57，1779-1818。
5.	Antos, Karen L.(2008)。A Higher Authority: How the Federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act Affects State Control over Religious Land Use Conflicts。Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review，35，557-591。
6.	Baker, Matthew(2008)。RLUIPA and Eminent Domain: Probing the Boundaries of Religious Land Use Protection。Brigham Young University Law Review，2008(4)，1213-1242。
7.	Bollettino, Vikki(2009)。The Quest for Congruence: Why the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act Should Apply to Eminent Domain。Seton Hall Law Review，39(4)，1263-1297。
8.	Carmella, Angela C.(2009)。RLUIPA: Linking Religion, Land Use, Ownership and the Common Good。Albany Government Law Review，2，485-536。
9.	Carnell, E. Darren(2002)。Zoning Churches: Washington State Constitutional Limitations on the Application of Land Use Regulations to Religious Buildings。Seattle University Law Review，25，699-729。
10.	Chaffee, Karla L.、Merriam, Dwight H.(2009)。Six Fact Patterns of Substantial Burden in RLUIPA: Lessons for Potential Litigants。Albany Government Law Review，2，437-483。
11.	Crisalli, Noelle(2005)。Civil Liberties for Urban Believers v. City of Chicago: A Defining Case for the Substantial Burden Test under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act。Pace Environmental Law Review，23，263-287。
12.	Dalton, Daniel(2010)。The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act-Recent Development。Urban Lawyer，42(3)，561-580。
13.	David, Robin M.(2006)。GOD v. WAL-MART: The Battle over the 'Better Use' of Land: Has the Supreme Court Allowed for Economic Development at the Cost if Invaluable Religious Rights?。Penn State Law Review，111(1)，239-261。
14.	Finetti, Cristina(2008)。Limiting the Scope of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act: Why RLUIPA Should Not Be Amended to Regulate Eminent Domain Actions Against Religious Property。Seton Hall Law Review，38，667-713。
15.	Gerwig-Moore, Sarah(2012)。Saving Their Own Souls: How RLUIPA Failed to Deliver on Its Promises。Legislation and Policy Review，4(1)，119-158。
16.	Glover, Andrew(2011)。The Pit and the Pendulum: How Far Can RLUIPA Go in Protecting the Amish?。Penn State Environmental Law Review，19(1)，109-130。
17.	Haddad, Nicholas William(2006)。Public Use or Private Benefit? The Post-Kelo Intersection of Religious Land Use and the Public Use Doctrine。Fordham Law Review，75，1105-1142。
18.	Hamilton, Marci A.(2009)。The Constitutional Limitations on Congress’s Power over Local Land Use: Why the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act Is Unconstitutional。Albany Government Law Review，2(2)，366-436。
19.	Hatch, Orrin、Kennedy, Ted(2000)。Not Land Use Immunity。Congressional Record，146(2)。
20.	Lennington, Daniel P.(2006)。Thou Shalt Not Zone: The Overbroad Applications and Troubling Implications of RLUIPA's Land Use Provisions。Seattle University Law Review，29，805-842。
21.	Leomczyk, Canon Kenneth G.(2009)。RLUIPA and Eminent Domain: How a Plain Reading of a Flawed Statue Creates an Absurd Result。Texas Review of Law and Politics，13，311-364。
22.	Lerman, Daniel N.(2008)。Taking the Temple: Eminent Domain and the Limits of RLUIPA。Georgetown Law Journal，96，2057-2101。
23.	MacLeod, Adam J.(2010)。A Non-Fatal Collision: Interpreting RLUIPA Where Religious Land Uses and Community Interests Meet。Urban Lawyer，12(1)。
24.	MacLeod, Adam J.(2011)。Resurrecting the Bogeyman: The Curious Forms of the Substantial Burden Test in RLUIPA。Real Estate Law Journal，40。
25.	Mathues, G. David(2006)。Shadow of a Bulldozer?: RLUIPA and Eminent Domain after Kelo。Notre Dome Law Review，81(4)，1653-1696。
26.	Ostrow, Ashira Pelman(2008)。Judicial Review of Local Land Use Decisions: Lessons from RLUIPA。Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy，31，717-760。
27.	Raccuis, Thomas E.(2012)。RLUIPA and Exclusionary Zoning: Government Defendants Should Have the Burden of Persuasion in Equal Terms Cases。Fordham Law Review，80，1853-1888。
28.	Rice, Terry(1988)。Re-Evaluating the Balance between Zoning Regulations and Religious and Educational Uses。Pace law Review，8(1)，1-61。
29.	Saxer, Shelley Ross(1995)。When Religion Becomes a Nuisance: Balancing Land Use and Religious Freedom When Activities of Religious Institutions Bring Outsiders into the Neighborhood。Kentucky Law Journal，84，507-552。
30.	Saxer, Shelley Ross(2004)。Eminent Domain Actions Targeting First Amendment Land Uses。Missouri Law Review，69，653-695。
31.	Saxer, Shelley Ross(2009)。Assessing RLUIPA’s Application to Building Codes and Aesthetic Land Use Regulation。Albany Government Law Review，2，623-652。
32.	Scaduto, Allison(2008)。RLUIPA as a Possible Shield from the Government Taking of Religious Property。Seton Hall Law Review，38，823-857。
33.	Serkin, Christopher、Tebbe, Nelson(2009)。Condemning Religion: RLUIPA and the Politics of Eminent Domain。Notre Dame Law Review，85(1)，1-54。
34.	Smolik, Sara(2004)。The Utility and Efficacy of the RLUIPA: Was It a Waste?。Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review，31，723-759。
35.	Stout, Kelli(2011)。Tent Cities and RLUIPA: How a New Religious-Land-Use Issue Aggravates RLUIPA。Seton Hall Law Review，41，465-499。
36.	Tuttle, Robert W.(2000)。How Firm a Foundation? Protecting Religious Land Use after Boerne。George Washington Law Review，68，861-924。
37.	Weiss, Jonathan D.、Lowell, Randy(2002)。Supersizing Religion: Megachurches, Sprawl, and Smart Growth。Saint Louis University Public Law Review，21，313-329。

會議論文
1.	Owens, David W.(2009)。Regulation of Religious Land Uses。The City Attorneys Conference，(會議日期: 2009/03/26)。

研究報告
1.	天主教會台灣地區主教團(2010)。2010年台灣地區天主教會教務統計表。延伸查詢
2.	Infranca, John(2012)。Institutional Free Exercise and Religious Land Use。
3.	Laycock, Douglas、Goodrich, Luke W.(2012)。RLUIPA: Necessary, Modest, and Under-Enforced。
4.	Reilly, Elizabeth(2009)。Empathy and Pragmatism in the Choice of Constitutional Norms for Religious Land Use Disputes。

圖書
1.	Kamptner, Greg(2012)。The Albemarle County Land Use Law Handbook。Albemarle County, Va：County Attorney's Office。

其他
1.	(2012)。列王紀，http://www.ccreadbible.org/Chinese%20Bible/sigao/1_ Kings_bible_Ch_21_.html， 2012/10/16。
2.	庄仔(2008)。五叔的二兒子庄谷峰要結婚了，http://jimmyzhuang.blogbus.com/logs/2008/01/d28.html。延伸查詢
3.	吳佳玲，張嘉慧(20120912)。2011台灣教勢報告，基督徒人口5.44%，http://news.dhf.org.tw/News.aspx?cate=01&key=2788。延伸查詢
4.	施曉光，范正群(20121021)。同為民請命，她行他碰壁：李鴻源獨厚高金？廖國棟不平，http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/oct/21/today-t3.htm。延伸查詢
5.	郝雪卿(20120526)。反對南屯天主堂重劃，教友遊行，http://www.cna.com.tw/News/aLOC/201205260171.aspx。延伸查詢
6.	賴春標(2001)。山刀出鞘--記東埔挖抗[墳]議事件，http://www.abohome.org.tw/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=597:records-record16-597&catid=47:record15&Itemid=246。
7.	Blumenthal, Ralph(20060125)。Humble Church Is at Center of Debate on Eminent Domain，http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/25/national/25depot.html?_r=0。
8.	Doyle, Martin，Felder, David(20080421)。Condemnation of Church Property Presents Unique Legal Issues，http://www.saul.com/media/article/1094_pdf_1619.pdf。
9.	Giaimo, Michael S.(2004)。Summary of Land Use Case Law under Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act，http://www.rc.com/documents/LandUseCaseLaw%20Giaimo.doc。
10.	Horner, Roger(2006)。Land Use Decisions Under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000: A Guide to RLUIPA，http://www.tmaa.us/pdfs/rluipa.pdf。
11.	Weinstein, Alan C.(2012)。The Effect of RLUIPA’s Land Use Provisions on Local Government，http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2051014， 2012/10/30。
12.	Chen, Wen-Liang(1995)。哀，教友死諫，http://bbs.nsysu.edu.tw/txtVersion/boards/catholic-youth/M.809424442.A.html。
13.	Williams, Joseph P.，Souchuns, Amy E.(2003)。Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000，http://www.Shipmangoodwin.com/files/Publication/7829583a-4f62-4a3c-8b2e-3a6c721558df/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/9bd8f6a7-7a35-41c5-a783-538bdf0a9a8d/religious_land_use.pdf。
14.	Ziegler, Edward H.(2009)。American Cities, Urban Planning Laws, and Places of Worship: Local Controls and National Protection in the United States，http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1441320。

圖書論文
1.	劉振忠。浴火重生的西螺天主堂。新聖堂落成紀念冊。延伸查詢

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

無相關期刊論文

無相關博士論文

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	土耳其史觀的外交政策
2.	族群、民族與現代國家：經驗與理論的反思
3.	澳洲的語言政策--從同化到多元文化
4.	由轉型正義到真相調查委員會
5.	天然資源、政體類型與國際軍事衝突--跨「時間」與「空間」的分析
6.	從土耳其的區域戰略環境評價土中關係
7.	由歷史角度看土耳其庫德族問題與現況
8.	凱末爾語文改革、國族想像及改革實踐評估
9.	土耳其的族群政策與問題
10.	Party Membership in Latin America Party Strategies and the Role of Party Members
11.	What Has Made Political Institutions in Botswana and Mauritius Tick?
12.	Democratization in the Balkans the Limits of Elite-Driven Reform
13.	Institutional Legacies and Political Transition in Central Asia
14.	Caucasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective
15.	China's Developmental Authoritarianism Dynamics and Pitfalls

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫