投資人對地主國仲裁程序的透明化問題--兼論跨太平洋夥伴協定下投資保障專章的相關規範_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	投資人對地主國仲裁程序的透明化問題--兼論跨太平洋夥伴協定下投資保障專章的相關規範
書刊名：	輔仁法學
作者：	高啟中
作者(外文)：	Kao, Chi-chung
出版日期：	2017
卷期：	53
頁次：	頁43-116
主題關鍵詞：	跨太平洋夥伴協定；投資人對地主國爭端解決；解決國家與他國國民間投資爭端公約；國際投資爭端解決中心；聯合國國際貿易法委員會仲裁規則；透明化；TPP；ISDS；ICSID Convention；ICSID；UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules；Transparency
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:1 共同引用:0 點閱:0

國際區域經濟整合日趨熱絡，我國近年亦積極爭取加入如跨太平洋夥伴協定（TPP）的國際經貿協定。TPP下的投保專章除制訂跨國投資之實體規範以外，其投資人對地主國爭端解決（ISDS）機制允許投資人依據解決國家與他國國民間投資爭端公約（ICSID公約）向國際投資爭端解決中心（ICSID）提交仲裁，或依據ICSID Additional Facility Rules進行仲裁，或依循聯合國國際貿易法委員會仲裁規則（UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules）或於其他經當事人同意之仲裁機構進行仲裁。為強化仲裁程序之正當性，保障公共利益與利害關係人之權益，投資人對地主國仲裁程序有透明化之必要。此透明化原則已漸次納入相關國際協定之規範。增進仲裁程序透明化涉及仲裁資訊之公開與公眾取得，仲裁聽審程序的公開，非爭端當事人之第三方參與程序表達意見，以及仲裁判斷內容之公開等措施。TPP投保專章因應仲裁程序透明化之相關規範為何，過去實務案例上如何落實適用此等規範，有探究之必要。

以文找文

In light of the growth in regional economy integration, Taiwan has endeavored to participate in FTAs such as the TPP. The investment chapter of the TPP includes not only provisions of substantive treatments towards investment, but also ISDS mechanisms. TPP's ISDS mechanisms allow an investor to request for arbitration against a host state in accordance with ICSID Convention art. 25(1) or ICSID Additional Facility Rules, or alternatively commence arbitral proceedings under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. In order to enhance legitimacy of the arbitration procedures, as well as to protect public interests and public policy, there is the need for transparency in the proceedings of investor-state arbitration. The principle of transparency has been gradually integrated into relevant international agreements. The reinforcement of transparency in arbitral proceedings involves public access to arbitration information and open hearing, third party's submission of opinions in arbitral proceedings, and the publication of arbitral awards. What exactly are the rules concerning transparency under the TPP's ISDS provisions? How might they be implemented in practice as guided by past cases? These issues deserve further study and analysis.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Knahr, Christina(2007)。Transparency, Third Party Participation and Access to Documents in International Investment Arbitration。Arbitration International，23(2)，327。
2.	Gomez, Katia Fach(2012)。Rethinking the Role of Amicus Curiae in International Investment Arbitration: How to Draw the Line Favorably for the Public Interest。Fordham International Law Journal，35(2)，509。
3.	Sabater, Anibal(2010)。Towards Transparency in Arbitration (A Cautious Approach)。Berkeley Journal of International Law Publicist，5，47。
4.	Ruscalla, Gabriele(2015)。Transparency in International Arbitration: Any (Concrete) Need to Codify the Standard?。Groningen Journal of International Law，3(1)，1。
5.	Mourre, Alexis(2006)。Are Amici Curiae the Proper Response to the Public's Concern on Transparency in Investment Arbitration?。The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals，5，257。
6.	Knahr, Christina、Reinisch, August(2007)。Transparency versus Confidentiality in International Investment Arbitration: The Biwater Gauff Compromise。The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals，6，97。

圖書
1.	李貴英(2004)。國際投資法專論--國際投資爭端之解決。台北：元照出版有限公司。延伸查詢
2.	Dolzer, Rudolf、Schreuer, Christoph(2012)。Principles of International Investment Law。Oxford University Press。

其他
1.	經濟部國際貿易局。跨太平洋夥伴協定（TPP）簡介，http://www.tpptrade.tw/db/pictures/AdminModules/PDT/01/11/_00000018/TPP%E7%B0%A1%E4%BB%8B.pdf。
2.	Biwater(20061127)。Petition for Amicus Curiae Status，http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0090.pdf。
3.	Biwater。Award，http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0095.pdf。
4.	Aguas del Tunari(20020829)。Petition by NGOs and People to Participate as an Intervening Party or Amici Curiae，http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0018.pdf。
5.	Aguas del Tunari(20030129)。Letter from Tribunal President David D. Caron to Petitioners，http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0019_0.pdf。
6.	BSG Resources(20150917)。Procedural Order，http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw4400.pdf。
7.	BSG Resources(20150513)。Procedural Order，http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ITA%20LAW%207001.pdf。
8.	Biwater(20070425)。Procedural Order，http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0092.pdf。
9.	Biwater(20070202)。Procedural Order，http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0091_0.pdf。
10.	Biwater(20060929)。Procedural Order，http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0089.pdf。
11.	European Federation for Investment Law and Arbitration(2015)。A Response to the Criticism against ISDS，http://efila.org/wpcontent/uploads/2015/05/EFILA_in_response_to_the-criticism_of_ISDS_final_draft.pdf。
12.	Friends of the Earth(20050930)。Amicus Curiae Application，http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/54364.pdf。
13.	(20001027)。Further Submission of the Claimant to the Petition of International Institute for Sustainable Development，http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/3937.pdf。
14.	(20070914)。Glamis Gold Ltd. v. United States of America NAFTA/UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules Proceeding，https://icsid.worldbank.org/en/Pages/News.aspx?CID=100。
15.	(20050916)。Glamis Gold v. United States, NAFTA/UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, Decision on Application and Submission by Quechan Indian Nation，http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/53592.pdf。
16.	IISD，CIEL(2007)。Revising the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules to Address State Arbitration，http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2007/investment_revising_uncitral_arbitration.pdf。
17.	ICSID。Cases，https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/cases/Pages/AdvancedSearch.aspx。
18.	ICSID Secretariat(20050512)。Suggested Changes to the ICSID Rules and Regulations，https://icsid.worldbank.org/en/Documents/resources/Suggested%20Changes%20to%20the%20ICSID%20Rules%20and%20Regulations.pdf。
19.	ICSID Secretariat(20041022)。Possible Improvements of the Framework for ICSID Arbitration，https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/resources/Documents/Possible%20Improvements%20of%20the%20Framework%20of%20ICSID%20Arbitration.pdf。
20.	Glamis(20090708)。Award，http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/125798.pdf。
21.	Methanex(20000831)。Submission of the Claimant Respecting Petition of the International Institute for Sustainable Development，http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/3948.pdf。
22.	Methanex(20001110)。Submission of Mexico Pursuant to Article 1128，http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/3936.pdf。
23.	Methanex(20001027)。Statement of Respondent United States of America Regarding Petitions for Amicus Curiae Status，http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/3970.pdf。
24.	(20010215)。Methanex v. United States, NAFTA/UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, Decision of the Tribunal on Petitions from Third Persons to Intervene as "Amici Curiae"，http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0517_0.pdf。
25.	(19971027)。Metalclad v. Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1, Decision on a Request by the Respondent for an Order Prohibiting the Claimant from Revealing Information，http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0505_0.pdf。
26.	NAFTA Free Trade Commission(20041007)。Statement of the Free Trade Commission on Non-Disputing Party Participation，http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/38791.pdf。
27.	NAFTA Free Trade Commission(20010731)。Interpretation of the Free Trade Commission of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions，http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/38790.pdf。
28.	(20040716)。Free Trade Commission Joint Statement--A Decade of Achievement，https://ustr.gov/archive/Document_Library/Press_Releases/2004/July/NAFTA_Free_Trade_Commission_Joint_Statement_-_A_Decade_of_Achievement.html。
29.	Mondev(20021011)。Award，http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1076.pdf。
30.	Methanex(20001110)。Submission of the Government of Canada，http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/3935.pdf。
31.	(20131001)。Statement of Canada on Open Hearings in NAFTA Chapter Eleven Arbitrations，http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/nafta-alena/openhearing.aspx?lang=en。
32.	Quechan Indian Nation(20050819)。Application for Leave to File a Non-Disputing Party Submission，http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/52531.pdf。
33.	(20020311)。Pope & Talbot v. Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, Decision and Order by the Arbitral Tribunal，http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0683.pdf。
34.	Paulsson, Jan，Petrochilos, Georgios(2006)。Revisions of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules，https://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/news/arbrules_report.pdf。
35.	National Mining Association(20061013)。Application for Leave to File a Non-Disputing Party Submission，http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/75178.pdf。
36.	Suez(20050519)。Order in Response to a Petition for Transparency and Participation as Amicus Curiae，http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0815.pdf。
37.	Suez(20070212)。Order in Response to a Petition by Five Non-Governmental Organizations for Permission to Make an Amicus Curiae Submission，http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/casedocuments/ita0823.pdf。
38.	Suez。Decision on Jurisdiction，http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0819.pdf。
39.	Suez(20150409)。Award，http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw4365.pdf。
40.	(20031007)。Statement on Open Hearing in NAFTA Chapter Eleven Arbitrations，https://ustr.gov/archive/assets/Trade_Agreements/Regional/NAFTA/asset_upload_file143_3602.pdf。
41.	UNCTAD(2012)。Transparency: UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements，http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/unctaddiaeia2011d6_en.pdf。
42.	UNCITRAL。Report of Working Group II (Arbitration and Conciliation) on the work of its fifty third session (Vienna, 4-8 October 2010)，http://daccess-ods.un.org/access.nsf/Get?OpenAgent&DS=A/CN.9/712&Lang=E。
43.	U.S. Department of State。NAFTA Investor-State Arbitrations，http://www.state.gov/s/l/c3439.htm。
44.	Tienhaara, Kyla(2010)。Investor-State Dispute Settlement in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Submission to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade，https://dfat.gov.au/trade/agreements/tpp/negotiations/Documents/tpp_sub_tienhaara_100519.pdf。
45.	The White House。Statement by the President on the Trans-Pacific Partnership，https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/10/05/statement-president-trans-pacific-partnership。
46.	(20060925)。World Duty Free v. Kenya, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/7, Award，http://www.italaw.com/documents/WDFv.KenyaAward.pdf。
47.	UPS(20011017)。Decision of the Tribunal on Petitions for Intervention and Participation as Amici Curiae，http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0883.pdf。
48.	(20021122)。UPS v. Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, Award on jurisdiction，http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0884.pdf。

圖書論文
1.	Asteriti, Alessandra、Tams, Christian J.(2010)。Transparency and Representation of the Public Interest in Investment Treaty Arbitration。INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW AND COMPARATIVE LAW。
2.	Menaker, Andrea J.(2010)。Piercing the Veil of Confidentiality: The Recent Trend towards Greater Public Participation and Transparency in Investor-State Arbitration。ARBITRATION UNDER INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS: A GUIDE TO THE KEY ISSUES。
3.	Levine, Judith(2011)。Navigating the Parallel Universe of Investor-State Arbitration under the UNCITRAL Rules。EVOLUTION IN INVESTMENT TREATY LAW AND ARBITRATION。
4.	Knahr, Christina(2011)。The New Rules on Participation of Non-Disputing Parties in ICSID Arbitration: Blessing or Curse?。EVOLUTION IN INVESTMENT TREATY LAW AND ARBITRATION。
5.	Feliciano, Florentino P.(2015)。The Ordre Public Dimensions of Confidentiality and Transparency in International Arbitration: Examining Confidentiality in the Light of Governance Requirements in International Investment and Trade Arbitration。TRANSPARENCY IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND INVESTMENT DISPUTE SETTLEMENT。
6.	Delaney, Joachim、Magraw, Daniel Barstow(2008)。Procedural Transparency。THE OXFORD HANDBOOK IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW。
7.	Neumann, Thore、Simma, Beth(2013)。Transparency in International Adjudication。TRANSPARENCY IN INTERNATIONAL LAW。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	國際投資爭端解決制度的改革：近代國家實踐的觀察
2.	跨太平洋夥伴協定下的投資人對地主國仲裁機制--以ICSID與UNCITRAL仲裁程序之比較為中心
3.	國際投資保障條約下投資人對地主國仲裁費用問題
4.	ICSID框架下臺商赴中國大陸跨國投資爭端解決之探討

無相關博士論文

無相關書籍

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫