:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:ICSID框架下臺商赴中國大陸跨國投資爭端解決之探討
書刊名:高大法學論叢
作者:林俊宏 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Chun Hung
出版日期:2009
卷期:5
頁次:頁179-217
主題關鍵詞:國外直接投資國際投資爭端解決中心解決國家與他國國民間投資爭端公約中國國際經濟貿易仲裁委員會仲裁Foreign direct investmentFDIInternational centre for settlement of investment disputesICSIDConvention on the settlement of investment disputes between states and nationals of other statesChina international economic and trade arbitration commissionCIETACArbitration reform package
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:40
  • 點閱點閱:58
國外直接投資近年來在經濟全球化的腳步下快速成長,構築成國際經貿體系中非常重要的一環,而FDI對資本輸出國或流入國的經濟活動亦扮演極重要角色,而各國為吸引外資以配合國家建設之發展,皆有不同的政策及法規範調整模式,惟跨國投資雖帶來高收益,但亦伴隨著高風險,而在面臨高風險時,外國投資人即須注意跨國投資爭端發生後可能的解決途徑,尤其現今國際投資爭端解決機制之形成及發展更有其重要性,即國際間必須維持一個有效的法秩序,以保障國際商業交易的繼續成長,故探討相關跨國投資爭端解決之機構有其意義。另一方面,中國大陸先前為吸引國外資金、促進國內經濟發展為目標,而提供多項投資優惠,但當中國大陸現今經濟發展至一定規模之後,即須調整產業結構及配合國家發展方向,適度修改法令,而為國家發展而作出之政策轉變原無可厚非,但若法規範更動頻繁,導致跨境投資之鉅額損失,外國投資人可否訴請被投資國予以補償?面對投資爭端,台商在大陸是否可獲得與他國投資者相同公平、有效之投資爭端解決待遇?或在中國大陸投資之台資企業是否可運用現行國際投資爭端機制加以解決?尤其當臺灣目前於國際社會之處境仍為尷尬之際,台資企業遇到投資糾紛時,如何自保?有何求助管道?是台資企業赴中國大陸投資時不可不加以考量的風險因素,故本文即欲針對國際投資爭端解決機制與台商赴中國大陸投資爭端解決模式加以整理與探討。
Under the trend of economic globalization, foreign direct investment has increased with high-speed, and become one part of international trade system. Because it's important role in economic activities, many countries have designed their own investment regulations and policies to fit the goals for national development. Although foreign direct investment has brought high-return, it also follows with high risk. Under such a high risk, foreign investors have to consider and find out the best resolutions for international investment disputes if it happens. Thus it is important and meaningful to debate the mechanism and legal orders for international investment disputes in order to protect free flow of international trade and business transactions. On the other hand, Mainland China had provided numbers of investment incentives to attract foreign capital and promote domestic economic development. However, following with the high economic growth rates, Mainland China had called off several special benefits for foreign investors, and made several legal adjustments to upgrade its industrial structures. Those changes may cause foreign investors huge loss so that they have to seek for the best way for investment disputes resolution. Taiwanese investors, as one of the biggest foreign investors, face different challenges and situation than other countries due to its special status in the international community. Therefore, this article aims to discuss the possible models for Taiwanese investors to handle investment disputes occurred in Mainland China.
期刊論文
1.王泰銓、周炳全(19991000)。兩岸經貿爭議之仲裁制度。月旦法學,53,128-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王泰銓、周炳全(19990100)。兩岸經貿爭議之協商、調解制度。月旦法學,44,87-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Amr A. Shalakany(2000)。Arbitration and the Third World: A Plea for Reassessing Bias under the Specter of Neoliberalism。Harv. Int’l L.J,41,419+ 434-438+459。  new window
4.Aron Broches。The Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States。Recueil des Cours,136,331+400+344+519。  new window
5.David R. Sedlak(2004)。ICSID’s Resurgence in International Investment Arbitration: Can the Momentum Hold?。Penn St. Int'l L. Rev,23,147+149。  new window
6.Ibrahim Shihata(1986)。ICSID Secretary--General, Towards a Greater Depolitization of Investment Disputes: the Roles of ICSID and MIGA。ICSID Rev.-Foreign Inv. L. J,1,4。  new window
7.Klaus Peter Berger(1988)。The New Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency Globalizing the Investment Insurance Approach Towards Development。Syr. J. Int’l L. & Com,15,13+52。  new window
8.Delgado, Richard(1985)。Fairness and Formality: Minimizing the Risk of Prejudice in Alternative Dispute Resolution。Wis. L. Rev,1359+1367。  new window
9.Toby Landau(1998)。Composition and Establishment of the Tribunal: Articles 14 to 36。Am. Rev. Int’l Arb,9,45。  new window
10.Vincent O. Orlu Nmehielle(2001)。Enforcing Arbitration Awards Under the International Convention for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID Convention)。Ann. Surv. Int’l & Comp,7,21+33。  new window
研究報告
1.易建明(2414)。大陸與東協簽署投資保障協定、自由貿易協定之研究:以直接投資條款內容與現狀為題 (計畫編號:NSC92-2414-H-218-001-)。  延伸查詢new window
2.Andrés Rigo Sureda(200206)。Two Views on ICSID Arbitration, ICSID: An Overview, World Arbitration and Mediation Report。  new window
學位論文
1.陳雅眉(2008)。ICSID架構下國際投資爭端解決體制之研究(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.吳嘉生(200810)。國際經濟法析論。文笙書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.周顯志(1998)。國際投資法教程。中國財政經濟出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.林俊宏(2006)。國際貿易法講義。台中市:林俊宏。  延伸查詢new window
4.林家亨(200702)。大陸投資優惠條件的法律效力探索。台北市:秀威資訊科技。  延伸查詢new window
5.Schreuer, Christoph H.(2001)。The ICSID Convention: A Commentary。Cambridge UK:Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.M. N. Shaw。International Law。Cambridge UK:Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Thomas E. Carbonneau(2007)。Cases and Materials on the Law and Practice of Arbitration。Thomson West。  new window
8.劉碧珍、陳添枝、翁永和(20051000)。國際貿易:理論與政策。台北:雙葉書廊。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.王泰銓、徐文耀、林宏儒、鍾啟彬(2000)。投資大陸市場法律與實務解析。學林文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.李貴英(2004)。國際投資法專論--國際投資爭端之解決。台北:元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.黃文祥(20080619)。商總發布「中國大陸投資爭端解決機制調查」,台北市:台灣商務新聞通訊社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States。  new window
圖書論文
1.傅豐誠(200607)。1986 年以來台商在中國大陸的地位與角色的演變。兩岸經驗20年。台北市:天下遠見出版。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE