:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以地理資訊系統界定醫療偏遠程度--以高雄市為例
書刊名:醫務管理期刊
作者:宋玉清林文德 引用關係
作者(外文):Song, Yu-chingLin, Wen-de
出版日期:2017
卷期:18:3
頁次:頁202-215
主題關鍵詞:地理資訊系統醫療偏遠地區可近性GISMedical remote areaAccessibility
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:26
  • 點閱點閱:7
目的:透過地理資訊系統,探討高雄市各鄉鎮市區內部之醫療可近性。方法:利用ArcGIS蒐集每一平方公里大小之網格中人口數與就醫交通距離資訊後,採用SPSS 20進行集群分析法,將其進行醫療偏遠程度之分類。結果:研究中被界定為等級四之區域屬於就醫最為便利之區域,約占總體研究樣本之3%,而約有66%之區域屬於就醫尚為便利之等級三區域,醫療偏遠程度較高的等級一和二之區域,兩者合計占總體研究樣本之31%,這些區域多位於高雄市東北方,此外本研究亦有列出對於醫療地理可近性應加強與關注之村里。結論:研究結果對於高雄市醫療偏遠地區之劃分,得以更加精細觀點呈現,對於後續醫療衛生政策上可提供參考。
Objectives: A geographic information system (GIS) was used to explore the medical accessibility of each administrative unit in Kaohsiung city. Methods: ArcGIS was used to gain the information regarding the population and transportation distance of each grid, and sort the information through cluster analysis. Results: The rank-four areas, which account for 3% of the entire sample in Kaohsiung city, are the most convenient areas to receive medical service. The rank-three areas are the second most convenient areas to receive medical service, accounting for 66% of the entire sample in Kaohsiung city. The rank-one and two areas, however, have poor medical accessibility and account for 31% of the entire sample in Kaohsiung city, most of which are located northeast of Kaohsiung city. In addition, the villages which should be a focus of concern and reinforced with respect to medical accessibility in the future are listed. Conclusions: This research provids a detailed viewpoint of the division of Kaohsiung city based on different medical accessibility ranks, and further assists authorities to implement related policies and practices in the future.
期刊論文
1.李妙純、沈茂庭(20080600)。全民健保下不同所得群體醫療利用不均因素分析。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,27(3),223-231。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.徐廷兆(20040200)。偏遠地區資訊服務推動現況。研考雙月刊,28(1)=239,103-111。  延伸查詢new window
3.葉婉榆、陳志聖、鄒欣縈、劉宜華、吳柏樺、曹雅琪、呂佳容(20120800)。花蓮縣偏遠與非偏遠地區民眾對於基層醫療保健服務的使用與需求之比較。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,31(4),371-387。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡文正、龔佩珍、楊志良、李亞欣、林思甄(20061000)。偏遠地區民眾就醫可近性及滿意度調查。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,25(5),394-404。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Statistic Canada(2001)。Rural and Small Town Canada Analysis Bulletin。  new window
2.陳順宇(2005)。多變量分析。華泰文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.衛生福利部(20160702)。衛生福利部焦點新聞,http://www.mohw.gov.tw/news/。  延伸查詢new window
2.Australia Institution or Health and Welfare(2004)。Rural, regional and remote health: a guide to remoteness classifications,http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=6442459567,(AIHW Catalogue Number PHE 53)。  new window
3.John C.,David N.,Gary, H.(2012)。Mapping Frontier and Remote Areas in the U.S.,https://www.questia.com/magazine/lP3-2845627911/mapping-frontier-and-remote-areas-inthe-u-s。  new window
4.OECD(2011)。OECD regional typology,https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy/OECD_regional_typology_Nov2012.pdf。  new window
5.Office for National Statistic(2014)。Exploring labour productivity in rural and urban areas in Great Britain: 2014,https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/labd/fe7bf77398c5816d0adae5e9d971bed49a06.pdf。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE