教學績效的變通模式__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	教學績效的變通模式
書刊名：	中華心理學刊
作者：	廖克玲／黃光國
作者(外文)：	Liao, Keh-lin／Hwang, Kwang-kuo
出版日期：	1978
卷期：	20:2
頁次：	頁53-66
主題關鍵詞：	教學情境；領導績效；變通模式
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:3 共同引用:0 點閱:20

　　　　　本研究之目的為對教學情境建立預測教師領導績效的變通模式。受試者為臺北市成功高級中學一年級的男生551人。本研究所用之主要方法，係以問卷收集學生對教師教學行為、人格特質之評估，以及學生本身的數學能力、成就動機等有關資料，並以其數學學業成績作為學業成就之指標。由因素分析之結果，得知學生係以「技巧」、「職權」、「結構性」及「回饋」四個向度評估教師之教學行為。在建立變通換式時，以上列四個因素之前三者作為教學情境因素，用以定義教學情境對教師教學之有利程度。依三個因素將全部受試者分為八組，然後探討各組學生在各不同教學情境下：（1）對教師人格特質寬容程度之評估與其數學學業成績之關採，（2）對教師人格特質寬容程度之評估與其成就動機之關係，及（3）學生的數學能力與數學學業成績之關係的變化。結果發現：這三種相關係數的數值在不同的教學情境下均有所不同，其變化相當富於教學上的意義，詳情請見結果及討論部份。

以文找文

　　　　　The purpose of this study is trying to develop a contingency model for predicting the teachers' effectiveness in classroom teaching situation. The subjects were 551 first grade male students of Cheng Kung High School in Taipei. Various inventories and tests were used to collect data on the students' perceptions of their teachers' teaching behavior, their perceptions on their teachers' personality traits of permissiveness, their mathematical ability and achievement motivation. By analyzing the subjects' responses to the Scale for Evaluating Teacher' Teaching Behavior, four factors were obtained, they were "Skill", "Position Power", "Structure", and "Feedback". In constructing the contingency model for predicting the teacher's effectiveness, the prior three of the four factors were used as situational factors to define the dimension of situational "favorableness to teacher". Accordingto these three factors, the subjects were divided into eight groups. Under each of the eight teaching situations, the following relationships were investigated: (1) Students' mathematical achievement and their perceptions of teachers' personality traits of permissiveness (2) Students' achievement motivation and their perception of teachers' personality of permissiveness, and (3) Students' mathematical ability and their mathematical achievement. The implications of current findings were explained, itcould be used as guidance for teaching.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	French, John R. P. Jr.(1956)。A formal theory of social power。Psychological Review，63(3)，181-194。
2.	Anderson, L. R.(1966)。Leader behavior, member attitudes, and task performance of intercultural discussion groups。Journal of Social Psychology，69，305-319。
3.	Veldman, D. J.、Peak, R. R.(1963)。Student teacher characteristics from the pupils viewpoint。Journal of Educational Psychology，54(6)，346-355。
4.	Entwistle, N. J.(1968)。Academic motivation and school achievement。Journal of Educational Psychology，38，181-188。
5.	Russell, I. L.(1969)。Motivation for school achievement: Measurement and validation。The Journal of Educational Research，62，263-266。
6.	Fiedler, F. E.(1966)。The effect of leadership and cultural heterogeneity on group performance: A test of the contingency model。Journal of Experimental Social Psychology，2(3)，237-264。
7.	Ivancevich, J. M.、Donnelly, J. H.(1970)。Leader Influence and Performance。Personnel Psychology，23，539-549。
8.	Fiedler, F. E.(1971)。Validation and extension of the contingency model of leadership effectiveness: A review of empirical findings。Psychological Bulletin，76，128-148。
9.	Cummin, P. C.(1967)。TAT correlates of executive performance。Journal of Applied Psychology，51，78-81。
10.	Nealy, S. M.、Blood, M. R.(1968)。Leadership performance of nursing supervisors at two organizational levels。Journal of Applied Psychology，52，414-422。
11.	Raven, B. H.、French, J. R. P. Jr.(1958)。Legitimate power, coercive power, and observability in social influence。Sociometry，21(2)，83-97。
12.	Graen, G. B.、Orris, J. B.、Alvares, K. M.(1971)。Contingency model of leadership effectiveness: Some experimental results。Journal of Applied Psychology，55(3)，197-201。
13.	Hill, W.(1969)。The validation and extension of Fiedler's theory of leadership effectiveness。Academy of Management Journal，12(1)，33-47。
14.	Hollander, E. P.、Julian, J. W.(1969)。Contemporary trends in the analysis of leadership processes。Psychological Bulletin，71(5)，387-397。
15.	Lawrence, Paul R.、Lorsch, Jay W.(1967)。Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations。Administrative Science Quarterly，12(1)，1-47。
16.	Nealey, S. M.、Owen, T. W.(1970)。A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis of Predictors and Criteria of Nursing Performance。Organizational Behavior and Human Performance，5，348-365。
17.	Shima, H.(1968)。The relationship between the leader's modes of interpersonal cognition and the performance of the group。Japanese Psychological Research，10(1)，13-30。
18.	Fishbein, M.、Landy, E.、Hatch, G.(1969)。Consideration of two assumptions underlying Fiedler's Contingency Model for the prediction of leadership eflectiveness。The American Journal of Psychology，82(4)，457-473。
19.	Fiedler, F. E.、O'Brien, G. E.、Ilgen, D. R.(1969)。The effect of leadership style upon the performance and adjustment of volunteer teams operating in stressful foreign environment。Human Relations，22(6)，503-514。
20.	Fiedler, F. E.、Meuwese, W. A. T.(1963)。Leader's contribution to task performance in cohesive and uncohesive groups。The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology，67(1)，83-87。
21.	Hartley, J.、Holt, J.、Hogarth, F. W.(1971)。Academic motivation and programmed learning。The British Journal of Educational Psychology，41(2)，171-183。
22.	Isaacson, R. L.、McKeachie, W. J.、Milholland, J. E.、Lin, Y. G.、Hofeller, M.、Zinn, K. L.(1964)。Dimensions of student evaluations of teaching。Journal of Educational Psychology，55(6)，344-351。
23.	Steers, R. M.(1975)。Task-goal attributes, nachievement, and supervisory performance。Organizational Behavior and Human Performance，13(3)，392-403。
24.	Steers, R. M.(1975)。Effects of need for achievement on the job performance-job attitude relationship。Journal of Applied Psychology，60(6)，678-682。
25.	Sheridan, J. E.、Slocum, J. W.、Min, B.(1975)。Motivational determinants of job performance。Journal of Applied Psychology，60(1)，119-121。
26.	Shaw, M. E.、Blum, J. M.(1966)。Effects of leadership style upon group performance as a function of task structure。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，3(2)，238-242。
27.	Ryans, D. G.(1959)。Some correlates of teacher behavior。Educational and Psychological Measurement，19(1)，3-12。
28.	O'brien, G. E.(1969)。Group structure and the measurement of potential leader influence。Australian Journal of Psychology，21(3)，277-289。
29.	Miner, J. B.(1962)。Personality and ability factors in sales performance。Journal of Applied Psychology，46(1)，6-13。
30.	Steers, R. M.、Spencer, D. G.(1977)。The Role of Achievement Motivation in Job Design。Journal of Applied Psychology，62(4)，472-479。

學位論文
1.	郭生玉(1972)。國中低成就學生心理特質之分析研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，台北。延伸查詢
2.	Mitchell, T. R.(1969)。Leader complexity, leadership style and group performance(博士論文)。University of Illinois。

圖書
1.	Heckhausen, H.(1967)。The anatomy of achievement motivation。N. Y.：Academic Press。
2.	Amidon, E.、Hunter, E.(1966)。Improving teaching: The Analysis of classroom verbal interaction。Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.。
3.	Ryans, D. G.(1960)。Characteristics of teachers: Their description, comparison, and appraisal。Washington, DC：American Council on Education。
4.	路易約(1977)。學校能力測驗指導手冊。臺北市：中國行為科學社。延伸查詢
5.	McGrath, J. E.(1962)。A Summary of Small Group Research Studies。Arlington, Va：Human Sciences Research Inc。
6.	Fiedler, Fred E.(1967)。A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness。New York：McGraw-Hill。
7.	Vroom, Victor Harold(1964)。Work and motivation。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。

圖書論文
1.	Kulik, J. A.、McKeachie, W. J.(1975)。The evaluation of teachers in higher education。Review of research in education。Itasca, IL：Peacock。
2.	Fiedler, F. E.(1964)。A Contingency model of leadership effectiveness。Advances in Experimental Social Psychology。New York：Academic Press。
3.	French, J. R. P. Jr.、Raven, B.(1959)。The Bases of Social Power。Studies in Social Power。Ann Arbor, Michigan：University of Michigan Press。
4.	Birney, R. C.(1968)。Research on the achievement motive。Handbook of personality : theory and research。Chicago：Rand McNally。
5.	Fiedler, F. E.(1965)。The contingency model: A theory of leadership effectiveness。Basic Studies in Social Psychology。New York：Holt, Rinehart and Winston。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	臺灣心理學研究之本土化的回顧與展望
2.	中國受測者所面臨的矛盾困境：對過份依賴西方評定量表的反省
3.	領導的變通模式：LPC分數的意義及模式的驗證

無相關博士論文

1.	如何研究中國人 : 心理學研究本土化論文集

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫