《明儒學案》卷四十二載錄明儒唐伯元文字凡九十一首，向為研究明代思想史者所據，然因《學案》版本不一，所錄篇章有所節刪，各本文字故有異同，導致疑義，影響句讀。本文以罕見之道光、光緒兩刻唐伯元《醉經樓集》與二老閣本、紫筠齋本及莫晉刻本三種主要《明儒學案》刊本互校，檢出二書文辭字句異同之處凡百餘處，各為釋說，以歸於正。結論指出，異同之處，固多以唐氏文集所載者為得，然原集刻訛之處，亦有因《學案》而得是正者，是《學案》於原集亦自有其參考價值也。

　　This paper collates the writings of the late Ming Confucian scholar Tang Boyuan as copied into in Huang Zongxi's famous collection of philosophical writings by Ming Confucians, the Mingru xue’an, with those found in rare copies of two Qing period editions of Tang's collected works, Zuijinglouji. More than one hundred occurrences of textual difference are found as a result, and in each case a decision for the correct expresion is made with an explanation. This proveison of a definitive text will render a firmer grasp of Tang's ideas and scholarship.