:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:明末清初城市手工業工人的集體抗議行動--以蘇州城為探討中心
書刊名:中央研究院近代史研究所集刊
作者:巫仁恕 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Jen-shu
出版日期:1997
卷期:28
頁次:頁47-88
主題關鍵詞:明末清初城市手工業工人集體行動蘇州Late ming and early qingUrban lifeCraftsmenCollective actionSuzhou
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:213
     過去關於明末清初城市手工業雇工罷工與暴動的研究,無論是中國大陸或是日木學者的研究,焦點大多是放在主雇關係的變化。本文以蘇州為例,嘗試從三個新的角度來探討明末清初這類城市手工業工人的集體抗議行動。首先是關於集體抗議形成的原因,嘗試將工人薪資與當時的經濟狀況,如物價、銀錢比價等作一比對,進一步地由物價的波動與薪資結構的關係出發,以解釋罷工暴動發生的原因。其次,透過歷史社會學所謂的「集體行動」的概念,分析這類集體抗議事件形成的要素,如組織、動員、抗議儀式、群眾心態、集體抗爭與集體暴動的形式等。結果顯示自明末手工業工人已有工人組織的雛型,至清初業已形成聯盟組織,雖然政府嚴禁其成立自己的會館公所,但此類組織對其集體行動具有動員的效力;工人的抗議儀式代表工人表達不滿的一種象徵行為,同時也反映出工人們漸漸地利用原有的傳統文化形式轉化為自己的文化。在集體抗議的方式方面,工人漸漸開始以達官請增工價或控告坊主扣克工資的方式來表達抗議,反映了集體抗議有漸漸走向合法抗爭的傾向。另外,過去大陸學者認為清政府在處理罷工時都是採取無情鎮壓的說法,本文則提出不同的解釋,強調清政府在勞資糾紛中扮演了重要的居中協調者的角色。
     Most studies on urban strikes and riots of craftsmen during the late Ming and early Qing period by scholars both in Mainland China and Japan have focused on the relationship between proprietors and their workers or craftsmen. By three approaches, this paper enquires into these workers' or craftsmen's collective actions of protest in Suzhou city during this period. First, by comparing the price fluctuation and craftsmen's wages, I try to explain why the demonstrations and protests happened. Second, by using the "collective actiion" theory of historical sociology I analyze the important elemens in craftsmen's collective action, that is, organization, mobilization, protest rituals, collective mentality, and forms of collective violence, etc. By the late Ming, craftsmen seemed to have developed a prototype of their form of organization which was further to develop into unionlike organization in the Qing period. Although craftsmen were prohibited by the local governments from establishing their guilds, their union-like organization had effect on mobilizing craftsmen for collective protests. The craftsmen's protest rituals represent a symbol of their discontent while also reflecting their transformation of traditional "high" culture into one of their own. With respect to the forms of protest, a significant trend of transformation seems to have taken place, i.e. moving away from violence towards legal expression. Third, most Mainland Chinese scholars take the view that whenever there were conflicts between employers and craftsmen, the authorities invariably sided with the employers, condemning any form of protest. However, this paper presents a different interpretation. It emphasizes the role the government played as an important coordinator in solving the conflicts between employers and craftsmen.
Other
1.洪煥椿(1992)。清代前期蘇州手工業工匠的貨幣工資和罷工鬥爭,南京。  延伸查詢new window
期刊論文
1.寺田隆信(1968)。蘇州踹布業の經營型態。東北大學文學部研究年報,18。  延伸查詢new window
2.高中利惠(1967)。明清時代の景德錄の陶業。社會經濟史學,32(5/6),87-90。  延伸查詢new window
3.汪士信(1981)。我國手工業行會的產生及其作用。中國社會科學院經濟研究所集刊,236-237。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉永成(1959)。試論清代蘇州手工業行會。A Study of History,11,44-45。  延伸查詢new window
5.Stearns, Peter N.(1965)。Patterns of Industrial Strike Activity in France during the July Monarchy。American Historical Review,70(2),382-384。  new window
6.林滿紅(1990)。明清的朝代危機與世界經濟蕭條十九世紀的經驗。新史學,1(4)。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.劉志琴(1982)。試論萬曆民變。天津。688。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉石吉(1986)。1924年上海徽幫墨匠罷工風潮─近代中國城市手藝工人集體行動之分析。臺北。422-424。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉永成、赫治青(1983)。論我國行會制度形成和發展。南京。123-130。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.明熹宗實錄。  延伸查詢new window
2.雍正硃批諭旨。  延伸查詢new window
3.何三畏(1987)。雲間志略。台北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.范金民、金文(1993)。江南絲綢史。北京市:農業出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.張居正。明世宗實錄。  延伸查詢new window
6.Thompson, Edward Palmer(1966)。The Making of the English Working Class。New York。  new window
7.羅一星(1994)。明清佛山經濟發展與社會變遷。廣州:廣東人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.梁淼泰(1991)。明清景德鎮城市經濟研究。南昌。  延伸查詢new window
9.Wang, Zongzhun(1923)。佛山忠義鄉志。  延伸查詢new window
10.馬建石、楊育棠、呂立人、吳壇(1992)。大清律例通考校注。北京:中國政法大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.江蘇省博物館(1959)。江蘇省明清以來碑刻資料選集。北京:三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
12.清高宗(1983)。皇朝文獻通考。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
13.中國人民大學清史研究所、中國人民大學檔案系中國政治制度史教研室(1979)。康雍乾時期城鄉人民反抗鬥爭資料(下冊)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
14.黃宗羲(19870200)。明文海。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.段本絡、張圻福(1986)。蘇州手工業史。江蘇古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.何炳棣(1966)。中國會館史論。臺北市:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.劉一焜。撫浙疏草。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
18.蘇州歷史博物館、江蘇師範學院歷史系、南京大學明清史研究室(1981)。明清蘇州工商業碑刻集。江蘇南京:江蘇人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.顧炎武(1984)。顧亭林詩文集。臺北:漢京文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
20.王翔(1990)。中國絲綢史研究。中國絲綢史研究。北京。  延伸查詢new window
21.(1984)。清代檔案史料叢編(11)。清代檔案史料叢編(11)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
22.佐久間重男(1964)。明末景德鎮の民窯の發展と民變。鈴木俊教授還曆記念東洋史論叢。東京。  延伸查詢new window
23.彭澤益(1984)。中國近代手工業史資料(第一卷)。中國近代手工業史資料(第一卷)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
24.全漢昇(197)。中國行會史。中國行會史。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
25.(1980)。興修漳泉會館碑。上海碑刻資料選輯。上海。  延伸查詢new window
26.Darnton, Robert(1984)。Readers Respond to Rousseau: The Fabrication of Romantic Sensitivity。The Great Cat Massacre and Other Episodes in French Cultural History。New York。  new window
27.Rude, George(1971)。The ‘Pre-industrial’ Crowd。Parish and London in the 18th Century: Studies in Popular Protest。N. Y.。  new window
其他
1.王臨元,陳淯(1992)。康熙浮梁縣志,江蘇:新華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.明神宗實錄。  延伸查詢new window
3.江西通志,臺灣。  延伸查詢new window
4.(1963)。大清會典事例,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳邑志。  延伸查詢new window
6.蔣以化。西臺漫記。  延伸查詢new window
7.(清)顧公燮(1967)。消夏閑記摘鈔,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.(明)葉紹袁(1968)。啟楨記聞錄,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.李煦(1985)。李煦奏摺,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.(清)顧誼祿。乾隆長洲縣志。  延伸查詢new window
11.(清)沈德潛。元和縣志。  延伸查詢new window
12.(清)藍浦(1969)。景德鎮陶錄,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.(明)朱國禎(1991)。皇明大事記,揚州。  延伸查詢new window
14.(明)牛若麟。吳縣志。  延伸查詢new window
15.(明)沈瓚。近事叢殘。  延伸查詢new window
16.(明)文秉(1976)。定陵註略。  延伸查詢new window
17.(1975)。宮中檔乾隆朝奏摺,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
18.(清)汪輝祖(1980)。病榻夢痕錄,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
19.(1967)。宮中檔雍正朝奏摺,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.李華(1983)。論中國封建社會的行會制度。中國資本主義萌芽問題論文集。南京:江蘇人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE