:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:數字系列完成測驗試題認知成分分析之研究
書刊名:教育心理學報
作者:林世華葉嘉惠
作者(外文):Lin, Shih-hwaYeh, Chia-huei
出版日期:1999
卷期:31:1
頁次:頁139-165
主題關鍵詞:數字系列完成測驗認知成分分析Number series completion testCognitive component analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:47
     本研究之目的在結合認知成分分析與心理計量分析的觀點來了解影響數字系列完 成作業試題難度的試題成分,以及分析在數字系列完成測驗中所測量之心理構念是否因為數 列規則破壞與否而有所不同,研究題材乃採用青年智力測驗中的數學測驗446名高二學生預 試資料:在分析方法方面,同時採用多元逐步迴歸方法以及線性對數潛在特質模式來了解試題 成分對於試題難度的影響。本研究之王要發現如下:(一)編製數字系列完成測驗時,加入不規 則數列不會造成試題反應維度的改變。(二)影響數字系列完成測驗試題難度的試題成分為「是 否為移動數列」、「週期長度」與「字串間是否有假造相同的數字」等三類;此三類試題成分對 於試題難度皆具有正向的預測力。(三)試題成分之間的交互作用也是試題難度變異的來源之 一。(四)利用多元逐步迴歸方法以及線性對數潛在特質模式進行試題成分分析所得結果頗為 一致。
     The purposes of this study were to decompose the difficulty level of number  series completion task, and to examine if the constructs for detecting regular number  series and irregular number series are different. The study was conducted with the  pretest data of the math test in the Youth Intelligence Test, and focused on the test  component analysis and the component parameter estimation that were calculated by  using stepwise regression model and the Liner Logistic Latent Trait Model. The major findings of this study are as follows: 1.The constructs to solve both regular number series items and irregular number  series items are of the same dimension. 2.The major difficulty accountability of number series completion task comes from  three components: If the series is moving or not, period of the series, and if the series is spurious identity or not. These three components significantly and positively related to the difficulty level of number series completion task. 3.In several cases, the interaction term among the components is able to account for the difficulty level of number series completion task. 4.The result shows that both stepwise regression and LLTM methods for estimation of component parameter are similar.
期刊論文
1.Green, K. E.、Smith, R. M.(1987)。A Comparison of Two Methods of Decomposing Item Difficulties。Journal of Educational Statistics,12(4),369-381。  new window
2.Zwick, R.(1987)。Assessing the dimensionality of NAEP reading data。Journal of Educational Measurement,24(4),293-308。  new window
3.Reckase, M. D.(1979)。Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implications。Journal of Educational Statistics,4(3),207-230。  new window
4.Holzman, T. G.、Pellegrino, J. W.、Glaser, R.(1983)。Cognitive variables in series completion。Journal of Educational Psychology,75(4),603-618。  new window
5.Simon, H.、Kotovsky, K.(1963)。Human acquisition of concepts for sequential patterns。Psychological Review,70(6),534-546。  new window
6.Kotovsky, K.、Simon, H. A.(1973)。Empirical tests of a theory of human acquisition of concepts for sequential patterns。Cognitive Psychology,4,399-424。  new window
7.LeFevre, J. A.、Bisanz, J.(1986)。A cognitive analysis of number-series problems: Sources of individual differences in performance。Memory & Cognition,14(4),287-298。  new window
8.Sternberg, R.(1981)。Intelligence and nonentrenchment。Journal of Educational Psychology,73(1),1-16。  new window
研究報告
1.郭生玉、林世華、蘇宜芬、宋德忠(1998)。高級中學資賦優異學生保送甄試升學鑑別用智力測驗及其題庫編製計量。台北市:教育部中等教育司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Sternberg, R. J.(1978)。Contrasting Conceptions of Intelligence and their Educational Implication。Washington, D.C.:Office of Naval Research。  new window
圖書
1.王寶墉(1995)。現代測驗理論。台北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Embretson, S.(1989)。Program UNLOG: An Extension of Fisher and Formann's Program for the Linear logistic Latent Trait Model。Kansas:University of Kansas。  new window
3.Wilson, D.、Wood, R. L.、Gibbons, R.(1983)。TESTFACT: Test scoring and item factor analysis。Chicago:Scientific Software。  new window
圖書論文
1.Butterfield, E. C.、Nielsen, D.、Tangen, K. L.、Richardson, M. B.(1985)。Theoretically based measurements of inductive reasoning。Test Design: Developments in Psychology and Psychometrics。New York:Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top